You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

APHEXDA Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Aphexda patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Aphexda is a drug marketed by Ayrmid Pharma and is included in one NDA. There are two patents protecting this drug.

This drug has nine patent family members in nine countries.

The generic ingredient in APHEXDA is motixafortide acetate. Two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the motixafortide acetate profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Generic Entry Outlook for Aphexda

Aphexda will be eligible for patent challenges on September 8, 2027. This date may extended up to six months if a pediatric exclusivity extension is applied to the drug's patents.

By analyzing the patents and regulatory protections it appears that the earliest date for generic entry will be September 8, 2030. This may change due to patent challenges or generic licensing.

Indicators of Generic Entry

< Available with Subscription >

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for APHEXDA?
  • What are the global sales for APHEXDA?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for APHEXDA?
Summary for APHEXDA
International Patents:9
US Patents:2
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 2
Clinical Trials: 1
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in APHEXDA?APHEXDA excipients list
DailyMed Link:APHEXDA at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for APHEXDA
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for APHEXDA
Generic Entry Date for APHEXDA*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
TO MOBILIZE HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS TO THE PERIPHERAL BLOOD FOR COLLECTION AND SUBSEQUENT AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA
NDA:
Dosage:
POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

Recent Clinical Trials for APHEXDA

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
National Cancer Institute (NCI)PHASE4
Emory UniversityPHASE4

See all APHEXDA clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for APHEXDA

APHEXDA is protected by two US patents and two FDA Regulatory Exclusivities.

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the earliest date for a generic version of APHEXDA is ⤷  Get Started Free.

This potential generic entry date is based on TO MOBILIZE HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS TO THE PERIPHERAL BLOOD FOR COLLECTION AND SUBSEQUENT AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA.

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Ayrmid Pharma APHEXDA motixafortide acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 217159-001 Sep 8, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Ayrmid Pharma APHEXDA motixafortide acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 217159-001 Sep 8, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Ayrmid Pharma APHEXDA motixafortide acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 217159-001 Sep 8, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for APHEXDA: A Comprehensive Analysis

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

APHEXDA (Cevostamab), developed by AbbVie, marks a significant development in the oncology drug landscape. As a bispecific antibody targeting BCMA and CD3 for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), APHEXDA’s market introduction reflects advanced immunotherapy trends. This analysis probes the intricate market dynamics influencing APHEXDA’s commercial trajectory, investment potential, and strategic positioning in a competitive pharmaceutical ecosystem.


I. Understanding APHEXDA’s Therapeutic Profile

Mechanism of Action and Clinical Indications

APHEXDA is a bispecific T-cell engager designed to rekindle the immune system's capacity to target malignant plasma cells. Its dual specificity binds BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen)—a well-validated target in multiple myeloma—and CD3 on T-cells, facilitating direct T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. This mechanism aligns with the paradigm shift toward immunotherapies in hematologic cancers, offering hope for patients refractory to existing treatments [1].

In clinical trials, APHEXDA has demonstrated promising response rates, particularly in heavily pretreated populations, which are often excluded from phase I/II trials of older therapies, bolstering its potential market appeal.


II. Market Landscape and Competitive Dynamics

Current Treatment Paradigms

Multiple myeloma management has evolved rapidly, emphasizing immunotherapies, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, and emerging CAR-T cell therapies [2]. The already crowded space encompasses established agents like Darzalex (daratumumab), Empliciti (elotuzumab), and recently approved CAR-T products such as Abecma (idecabtagene vicleucel) and Carvykti (ciltacabtagene autoleucel).

APHEXDA’s Differentiation and Positioning

APHEXDA’s bispecific format offers several advantages:

  • Potential for Outpatient Administration: Unlike CAR-T therapies requiring hospitalization, bispecifics can often be administered in outpatient settings, reducing healthcare costs.
  • Broad Patient Applicability: Its off-the-shelf nature facilitates quicker access compared to autologous CAR-T, advantageous in rapidly progressing diseases.
  • Efficacy in Refractory Cases: Demonstrates robust activity where others have failed, filling a significant unmet need.

However, competition is stiff, with other bispecifics like Teclistamab (Celltrion/Johnson & Johnson) and Talquetamab (Genmab), which are also targeting BCMA, vying for market share. Their ongoing clinical trials and upcoming approvals will further define the competitive terrain.


III. Market Penetration and Adoption Drivers

Regulatory Milestones

Incremental approvals in major markets—U.S., EU, Japan—are critical. The FDA’s potential Fast Track or Breakthrough Therapy Designation could accelerate APHEXDA’s market entry and reimbursement pathways.

Reimbursement and Pricing Strategies

As a high-cost biologic, APHEXDA's pricing will influence uptake. Value-based pricing models, emphasizing its efficacy in refractory settings, could facilitate coverage by payers. Early engagements with insurers and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies will be vital for widespread adoption.

Physician and Patient Acceptance

Training clinicians to manage unique adverse events associated with bispecifics, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and addressing patient preferences for outpatient therapies, will impact real-world adoption.


IV. Geographic and Demographic Considerations

Market Access in Developed Economies

U.S. and European markets provide lucrative opportunities owing to high multiple myeloma incidence and healthcare infrastructure readiness. Regulatory hurdles might delay launches but are generally surmountable given positive trial data.

Emerging Markets

Growth potential exists, contingent on affordability, local manufacturing, and infrastructure to support biologic therapies. Strategic partnerships with local entities could facilitate market entry.

Demographic Trends

An aging population anticipates higher disease prevalence, expanding the potential patient pool. However, comorbidities could influence treatment choices and tolerability profiles.


V. Financial Trajectory and Investment Outlook

Revenue Projections

Assuming regulatory approval in the next 1-2 years, APHEXDA could generate peak sales estimated between $1-3 billion annually within five years, aligned with similar bispecific agents' trajectories [3]. The initial launch phases will likely see cautious uptake, with rapid acceleration as data solidifies.

R&D and Commercial Investment

Significant investment in clinical trials, manufacturing capacity, and education campaigns underpin the commercial success of APHEXDA. AbbVie’s established commercialization infrastructure provides a strategic advantage.

Risk Factors

  • Competitive pressure from existing and pipeline therapies
  • Regulatory delays or unfavorable trial outcomes
  • Pricing and reimbursement constraints

In a bullish scenario, early approvals and positive real-world data could catapult APHEXDA to blockbuster status; conversely, setbacks could constrain its financial impact.


VI. Strategic Recommendations for Stakeholders

  • Pharma and Investors: Focus on timely regulatory filings and market access strategies. Prioritize competitive differentiation and cost-effective manufacturing.
  • Healthcare Providers: Prepare for patient management protocols specific to bispecific therapies.
  • Policymakers and Payers: Develop sustainable reimbursement frameworks that recognize the value of innovative immunotherapies like APHEXDA.

Key Takeaways

  • APHEXDA’s novel bispecific design positions it well within the expanding immunotherapy landscape for multiple myeloma.
  • Its potential for outpatient administration and activity in refractory cases could offer competitive advantages.
  • Market success hinges on regulatory approvals, strategic pricing, and clinician adoption amidst fierce competition.
  • Early investment in market access and education will be critical to maximize revenue potential.
  • Long-term growth prospects are promising but sensitive to clinical, regulatory, and commercial risks.

FAQs

1. When is APHEXDA预计将获得市场批准?

AbbVie has initiated pivotal trials with some regulatory filings anticipated within 2-3 years, contingent on trial outcomes. Early approval windows could accelerate commercialization.

2. How does APHEXDA differentiate itself from CAR-T therapies?

Unlike CAR-T, APHEXDA is an off-the-shelf bispecific antibody, enabling outpatient administration without the need for personalized cell manufacturing, reducing treatment delays and logistical complexities.

3. What are the main safety concerns associated with APHEXDA?

CRS and neurotoxicity are notable adverse events, typical of T-cell engaging therapies. Proper management protocols are essential for safe administration.

4. How might competitive therapies impact APHEXDA’s market share?

Competing BCMA bispecifics and CAR-T treatments will influence market penetration. Differentiation through efficacy, safety, and convenience will be key to capturing market share.

5. What is the potential global reach for APHEXDA?

Developed markets will be primary launch zones, with emerging markets presenting growth opportunities subject to pricing strategies and healthcare infrastructure development.


References

[1] AbbVie. "Cevostamab (APHEXDA) Clinical Data."

[2] International Myeloma Working Group. "Treatment landscape of multiple myeloma."

[3] EvaluatePharma. "Biotech and Specialty Pharma Sales Forecasts."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.