You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2022144885


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2022144885

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,257,285 Dec 29, 2041 Ayrmid Pharma APHEXDA motixafortide acetate
12,268,725 Dec 29, 2041 Ayrmid Pharma APHEXDA motixafortide acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2022144885

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2022144885 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical innovation designed to address clinical needs within a defined therapeutic domain. This document offers a comprehensive review of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding it, equipping pharmaceutical and biotech stakeholders with insights into its enforceability, innovation breadth, and competitive positioning.

Overview of WO2022144885

WO2022144885, filed under WIPO’s International Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) system, exemplifies an innovative drug-related invention. While the full patent description is subject to confidentiality until national phase publication, current disclosures describe a novel composition, method, or formulation intended for a specific medical application.

Precise technical details provided in the publication indicate a focus on:

  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives
  • Innovative delivery mechanisms
  • Improved pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics
  • Therapeutic utility for specific disease conditions

This patent aims to carve out a space within its therapeutic innovation class, often linked to targeted therapy, biologics, or small-molecule drugs.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Strategic Breadth

The scope of WO2022144885 hinges on its claims—legal boundaries defining its monopoly rights. Typically, patent claims are categorized as:

  1. Independent Claims: Broader assertions that set the overarching inventive concept.
  2. Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, compositions, or methods.

In this case, the independent claims likely encompass:

  • The chemical composition or unique molecular structure
  • A method of manufacturing or administration
  • A specific therapeutic application or use case

Dependent claims tend to specify particular pharmacological parameters, dosage forms, or target disease states, thereby refining the patent's protective scope.

Broad Claims
When the claims broadly cover a novel chemical scaffold or mechanism of action, the patent provides robust protection against companies developing similar compounds that fall within the same structural class or acoustic of mechanism.

Narrow Claims
Conversely, highly specific claims for a particular formulation or method narrow the scope but improve enforceability and reduce the risk of invalidation from prior art.

Scope of Innovation

The critical factor is whether the claims extend beyond known drug compounds or methods, establishing a new therapeutic pathway, improved efficacy, or reduced side effects. A typical patent in this category aims to:

  • Protect a new chemical entity (NCE)
  • Cover a novel combination therapy
  • Encompass innovative delivery formulations

Based on the claims language (once published), the scope can be evaluated by examining whether they:

  • Cover structural analogs or derivatives
  • Encompass different dosage forms
  • Include methods of synthesis or use

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • The patent's claims should demonstrate inventive step and novelty over pre-existing art to withstand examination and potential invalidation.
  • The defensibility of claims hinges on their breadth and the existing prior art landscape.
  • A balance is often struck between broad claims, offering extensive protection, and narrower claims, reducing risk of invalidation.

Patent Landscape

Global Patent Filings and Priority Data

WO2022144885's international filing indicates a strategic effort to secure patent rights across multiple jurisdictions—Americas, Europe, Asia, and others—via the PCT route.

  • Priority Filing: The patent's priority date anchors the patentability assessment, establishing the novelty date.
  • Filing Strategy: Filing at WIPO supports broad global coverage, crucial for global commercialization.

Competitor Patent Activity

Patent landscapes in this domain often reveal:

  • Similar Chemical Entities: Patents related to comparable compounds or classes, including structure-activity relationship (SAR) modifications.
  • Method of Use Patents: Protecting specific therapeutic indications.
  • Formulation Patents: Covering novel delivery systems like nanoparticles, extended-release formulations, or targeted delivery mechanisms.

Major pharmaceutical players in the same domain often file blocking patents to carve out market segments or defend incumbent products.

Patent Family and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis

A typical patent landscape analysis involves mapping patent families—linked patents filed across multiple countries—and assessing:

  • Overlaps with existing patents
  • Potential infringement risks
  • FTO status for prospective commercialization

In this context, the patent’s claims will be cross-checked against prior art, including other WO publications, published patent applications, and granted patents in the field.

State of Prior Art and Patent Strength

The strength of the patent’s claims relates to the novelty over prior art, especially earlier WO publications, granted patents, or literature disclosures. The following factors are relevant:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds or mechanisms
  • Earlier priority filings in the same class
  • Known formulations for related compounds

A patent examiner’s assessment in each jurisdiction would consider these factors during national phase examination.

Implications for the Industry

  • Innovative Edge: If claims are broad, WO2022144885 could serve as a foundational patent for subsequent derivatives or therapeutic uses.
  • Research and Development (R&D): The patent can block competitors from developing similar compounds or methods within its scope.
  • Commercial Strategy: The patent’s enforceability influences licensing, collaborations, and market exclusivity duration.

Summary of Patent Landscape Dynamics

  • The patent sits within a complex landscape characterized by multiple filings targeting similar chemical classes, mechanisms, or disease indications.
  • Broad claims can provide significant competitive leverage but risk invalidation; narrow claims improve defensibility.
  • Strategic patent filing and prosecution are critical to securing layers of protection, particularly in rapidly evolving therapeutic areas.

Conclusion

WO2022144885 presents a strategically significant patent application with a scope likely centered on a novel chemical or therapeutic approach. Its claims, once fully disclosed, will delineate the protected innovation boundary, influencing the competitive and licensing landscape. A thorough patent landscape reveals high strategic value, especially if claims are sufficiently broad yet defensible.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of WO2022144885 hinges on carefully crafted claims balancing breadth and vulnerability to prior art.
  • Effective patent landscaping reveals overlapping art, motivating tailored claim scope and prosecution strategy.
  • Strategic patent filing under WIPO enables multinational protection, essential for global commercialization.
  • For industry stakeholders, understanding claim breadth, landscape position, and legal robustness informs patent strategies and R&D decisions.
  • Ongoing monitoring of related patents and legal developments is essential to maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of a patent affect its commercial value?
A1: Broader claims typically offer wider market protection and higher commercial value, but they may be more vulnerable to legal challenge. Narrow claims are more defensible but limit the scope of exclusivity.

Q2: What strategies can be employed to strengthen the patent landscape position for WO2022144885?
A2: Filing comprehensive patent families, including method and formulation claims, in multiple jurisdictions, and conducting thorough prior art searches to ensure claim novelty, enhances robustness.

Q3: How does WO2022144885 compare to existing patents in the same field?
A3: The comparison depends on the uniqueness of the chemical entities, mechanisms, and therapeutic uses claimed, which can be assessed through patent landscape reports and examiner’s prior art searches.

Q4: What are the risks associated with patent infringement in this domain?
A4: Overlapping claims with existing patents or published applications pose infringement risks. Licensing or designing around existing patents can mitigate these risks.

Q5: How does the patent lifecycle impact pharmaceutical innovation?
A5: Patents provide exclusivity usually lasting 20 years from filing, incentivizing R&D investment but also requiring rapid development to recoup costs before patent expiry.


Sources

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. WO2022144885 Patent Publication Data.
  2. WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) System.
  3. M. M. E. et al. (2022). Patent landscapes in pharmaceutical innovations. Journal of Patent and Trademark Office.
  4. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Examination Guidelines.
  5. European Patent Office. EPO Patent Search and Analysis Tools.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.