Last Updated: August 8, 2026

ADRUCIL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Adrucil, and what generic alternatives are available?

Adrucil is a drug marketed by Pharmacia And Upjohn and Teva Parenteral and is included in four NDAs.

The generic ingredient in ADRUCIL is fluorouracil. There are fifteen drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the fluorouracil profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Adrucil

A generic version of ADRUCIL was approved as fluorouracil by FRESENIUS KABI USA on September 30th, 1998.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ADRUCIL?
  • What are the global sales for ADRUCIL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ADRUCIL?
Summary for ADRUCIL
Recent Clinical Trials for ADRUCIL

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Kimberly PerezPhase 2
Colin D. Weekes, M.D.Phase 1
AstraZenecaPhase 2

See all ADRUCIL clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ADRUCIL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pharmacia And Upjohn ADRUCIL fluorouracil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 081222-001 Jun 28, 1991 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Parenteral ADRUCIL fluorouracil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 081225-001 Aug 28, 1991 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmacia And Upjohn ADRUCIL fluorouracil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017959-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Parenteral ADRUCIL fluorouracil INJECTABLE;INJECTION 040023-001 Oct 18, 1991 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: June 12, 2026

AdruCil (Fluorouracil) Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory: Pricing, Demand, Competition, and Exclusivity-to-Generic Outlook

Executive summary: AdruCil is a US brand of fluorouracil (5-FU) injection used in oncology chemotherapy. As a legacy cytotoxic, its market trajectory is shaped by (1) declining branded share versus low-cost generics and authorized distributors, (2) episodic supply and procurement volatility tied to sterile-manufacturing capacity, and (3) pricing pressure driven by Medicare Part B reimbursement, hospital tender dynamics, and wholesale acquisition cost compression. The financial profile is typically characterized by low-to-mid single-digit brand revenue with heavy pass-through of cost-and-supply cycles, and by a compressed long-term upside after generic penetration.

Note: A complete, citation-grade financial trajectory (revenue history by year, margin bands, segment contribution, and specific AdruCil contract pricing) is not possible here because the required, drug-specific financial disclosures and broker datasets are not included in the source set provided to this model.


What is AdruCil (fluorouracil) and where does it sit in oncology demand?

AdruCil is the brand name for fluorouracil (5-FU) injection, a foundational chemotherapy agent used across multiple regimens. Demand is driven less by “new patient growth” and more by treatment incidence of solid tumors and regimen intensity, plus hospital formulary adoption for multisource supply.

Which cancers use 5-FU regimens most often?

Across US oncology practice, 5-FU is commonly used in combination protocols for:

  • Colorectal cancer (often with leucovorin; also used in metastatic settings)
  • Gastrointestinal malignancies including gastric and pancreatic regimen contexts in select protocols
  • Head and neck cancer settings where 5-FU is part of combination chemo-radiation or systemic therapy

How do regimen patterns affect AdruCil demand?

  • Cycle-based purchasing: hospital procurement tracks regimen schedules and inventory replenishment windows.
  • Substitution pressure: when multiple equivalent 5-FU sources are available, contracting shifts to lowest net-cost.
  • Supply-driven ordering: sterile drug manufacturing disruptions can temporarily raise utilization of the remaining available SKU and channel inventory.

How do pricing dynamics work for legacy IV oncology brands like AdruCil in the US?

For older, widely genericized cytotoxics, the pricing model trends toward near-parity with the generic basket, with brand differentiation mostly limited to availability assurance and contracting relationships.

What drives net price for AdruCil?

  • Medicare Part B reimbursement mechanics: net spending is strongly correlated with the ASP-based reimbursement environment and prompt adjustments to WAC-linked benchmarks.
  • 340B and hospital contract structures: pricing can diverge from public list price due to group purchasing organization (GPO) terms and contract rebates.
  • Wholesale tendering and inventory coverage: procurement often prioritizes supply continuity, then net cost.

Why do cytotoxic injectables see aggressive erosion?

  • Therapeutic equivalence across generics reduces payer willingness to pay premium.
  • Formulary migration toward lowest net-cost multipliers.
  • Conversion to generic-first procurement when supply is stable.

How does supply volatility affect market share and financial trajectory for AdruCil?

With sterile injectables, supply changes can temporarily shift volume even when pricing stays constrained.

Supply shocks that typically move unit volume

  • Manufacturing downtime or yield loss in aseptic processing
  • Regulatory enforcement actions affecting batch release
  • Temporary shortages that shift channel orders to available SKUs

Financial impact pattern

  • Short-term upside during constrained supply for the brand SKU with available supply.
  • Mean reversion when alternative sources return or new approvals launch.
  • Working-capital swings: inventory and backlog management can produce quarter-to-quarter revenue volatility even when underlying demand is stable.

What is the competitive landscape for injectable fluorouracil, and who does AdruCil compete with?

AdruCil competes with:

  • Multiple approved 5-FU generic manufacturers (IV solution products)
  • Authorized generic supply channels where brand-like distribution is offered without branded marketing
  • Therapeutic substitution in protocol design, though substitution from 5-FU to alternatives is regimen-dependent and not a universal option

How do competitors win in procurement?

  • Supply continuity (short lead times and reliable batch release)
  • Contract pricing below brand net cost
  • Portfolio coverage across strengths and package configurations

What does that imply for AdruCil’s longer-term share?

  • If multiple generic suppliers are active, branded share tends to drift down unless AdruCil has availability or tender-specific advantages.

When does AdruCil face exclusivity expiry or generic entry risk?

AdruCil is a legacy cytotoxic. From a market-dynamics standpoint, most competitive entry risk already occurred historically through generic approvals, leaving ongoing “entry” risk primarily tied to:

  • additional generic launches in specific strengths, pack sizes, or presentations
  • changes in manufacturing site coverage
  • potential ANDA resubmissions or re-approvals that alter competitive set dynamics

What matters for near-term exclusivity-to-launch

For legacy injectables, market moves are less about “brand exclusivity” and more about:

  • whether the brand SKU retains meaningful hospital contracting
  • whether any remaining patent barriers block specific label presentations (not inferred here because no patent/Orange Book dataset is provided)

What is the financial trajectory likely to look like quarter-to-quarter?

A typical trajectory for legacy oncology injectables with active generic competition:

  • Revenue volatility driven by supply availability and procurement cycles.
  • Gradual compression in branded net price and share as generic sources remain stable.
  • Lumpiness around tenders, GPO contract renewals, and batch release events.

Key financial drivers

  • Net sales are tied to:
    • injectable dose consumption
    • contract coverage
    • gross-to-net adjustments that rise when competitive bidding intensifies
  • Cash flow sensitivity is elevated due to:
    • working capital needs for sterile batch production
    • contingency inventory if supply risk is material

How does reimbursement and tender pricing shape AdruCil’s margins?

Branded cytotoxics are exposed to:

  • Margin compression as wholesalers and hospitals demand net price reductions
  • Volume trade-offs when procurement shifts between suppliers
  • Increase in rebates/chargebacks as contracting becomes more competitive

What typically happens to gross margin

  • Brand gross margin declines over time as:
    • WAC is reduced or discounted
    • net-to-list spread widens under competitive pressure
  • Exception: if there is a temporary supply shortage limiting generic availability, margins can stabilize or improve until competition returns.

What commercial levers still matter for AdruCil despite generic dominance?

Even in generic-heavy markets, brands that remain on formulary can preserve a role via:

  • Reliability in delivery during constrained supply periods
  • Favorable hospital contracting that keeps the brand in procurement catalogs
  • Package and strength alignment with protocol needs and formulary lists
  • Distribution breadth to reduce stockout risk

Where growth is most realistic

  • Growth is usually not driven by new indications.
  • It is more realistic through contract wins and inventory-driven substitution during shortages.

What generic entry risks exist for fluorouracil injection that could affect AdruCil?

Risks are typically operational rather than breakthrough:

  • New ANDA approvals for additional presentations can expand the competitive set and push prices down.
  • Manufacturing disruptions at other sites temporarily reduce competition.
  • OOS episodes can shift demand to whatever suppliers have released product.

What to monitor

  • Batch release patterns and shortage notices
  • Site capacity expansion or contraction signals from manufacturers
  • Hospital tender outcomes for oncology pharmacy procurement categories

What role does regulation play in AdruCil’s market dynamics?

For sterile injectables, regulation affects market access and continuity:

  • FDA inspections and enforcement actions can cause temporary supply disruptions.
  • Quality systems and sterile processing compliance determines batch release velocity.
  • Labeling or manufacturing changes can create delays.

These factors translate into availability-driven revenue movements even when clinical demand is steady.


How does AdruCil compare with other legacy oncology injectables in financial behavior?

The competitive and financial shape for AdruCil is consistent with legacy IV chemo:

  • Generic competition drives long-run price compression.
  • Supply constraints can cause short spikes in usage.
  • Contracting and reimbursement mechanisms define the steady state.

The distinguishing variable is whether AdruCil remains materially preferred by any large contracting group during periods when some generic competitors are less reliable on supply.


Key Takeaways

  • AdruCil’s market dynamics follow a legacy cytotoxic pattern: stable underlying clinical usage, structural pricing pressure, and availability-driven short-term swings.
  • Long-term financial upside is limited by generic competition and procurement behavior that prioritizes lowest net cost with supply reliability.
  • The near-term revenue profile is most sensitive to sterile manufacturing capacity, batch release timing, and tender contracting cycles.
  • Financial trajectory should be evaluated through net sales volatility around supply events and gross-to-net changes tied to competitive contracting.

FAQs

  1. Why does branded fluorouracil injection revenue remain volatile even after generic entry?
    Supply continuity, hospital tender timing, and batch release constraints drive short-term volume shifts.

  2. What typically happens to AdruCil net price when multiple generic 5-FU suppliers are fully available?
    Net price compresses toward the generic basket as contracting shifts to lowest net-cost SKUs.

  3. How do oncology hospital formularies impact branded 5-FU injection pull-through?
    Once generic-first procurement is implemented, the brand’s pull-through depends on contract placement and supply reliability.

  4. Do supply disruptions at specific 5-FU manufacturers increase AdruCil sales?
    Yes, temporarily, if AdruCil is among the available SKUs in the contracted supply set.

  5. What operational indicators best predict branded performance for legacy sterile oncology products?
    FDA-related batch release delays, shortage notices, and manufacturing site capacity changes.


References (APA)

  1. [No citable, drug-specific source set was provided in the prompt for AdruCil financials, FDA/Orange Book listings, or patent/exclusivity status.]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.