You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

ACTIGALL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Actigall, and when can generic versions of Actigall launch?

Actigall is a drug marketed by Teva Branded Pharm and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in ACTIGALL is ursodiol. There are eight drug master file entries for this compound. Thirty suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the ursodiol profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Actigall

A generic version of ACTIGALL was approved as ursodiol by EPIC PHARMA on March 14th, 2000.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ACTIGALL?
  • What are the global sales for ACTIGALL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ACTIGALL?
Summary for ACTIGALL
Drug patent expirations by year for ACTIGALL
Drug Prices for ACTIGALL

See drug prices for ACTIGALL

Recent Clinical Trials for ACTIGALL

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioPhase 2
Children's Healthcare of AtlantaPhase 1
University of PittsburghPhase 1

See all ACTIGALL clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ACTIGALL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Teva Branded Pharm ACTIGALL ursodiol CAPSULE;ORAL 019594-001 Dec 31, 1987 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Teva Branded Pharm ACTIGALL ursodiol CAPSULE;ORAL 019594-002 Dec 31, 1987 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Pharmaceutical Drug: ACTIGALL

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Actigall, the brand name for ursodiol (ursodeoxycholic acid), has established a notable position within the pharmaceutical landscape primarily for treating hepatobiliary disorders. This drug has experienced evolving demand influenced by clinical developments, regulatory standards, and shifting healthcare paradigms. Understanding its market dynamics and financial trajectory provides valuable insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, healthcare providers, and strategic partners.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Profile

Actigall (ursodiol) is indicated for the dissolution of certain types of gallstones, prevention of gallstone formation in certain patient populations, and treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. Its origin as a naturally occurring bile acid offers a well-understood safety profile and a longstanding history of clinical use.

The drug’s utility extends beyond gallstone management. Its potential anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects have sparked interest in broader hepatological and gastrointestinal applications, potentially influencing future market expansion.


Market Landscape and Drivers

1. Clinical Demand for Gallstone Management
Gallstone disease remains prevalent, especially in Western jurisdictions. According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, approximately 10-15% of adults in the United States suffer from gallstones, creating a persistent need for effective medical therapies like ursodiol.

While cholecystectomy is definitive, medical dissolution with agents like Actigall offers a minimally invasive alternative for select patient groups, particularly those unfit for surgery.

2. Rising Incidence of Liver-Related Diseases
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), formerly primary biliary cirrhosis, is a chronic autoimmune liver disease with limited treatment options. Ursodiol’s approval for PBC has sustained its relevance amid an increasing diagnosis rate, partly driven by heightened awareness and advanced diagnostic technologies.

3. Off-Label and Emerging Uses
Recent research suggests ursodiol’s potential preventive role against conditions like nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and certain instances of biliary cirrhosis. While off-label prescribing influences market dynamics, regulatory approvals and clinical validation are crucial for realizing broader commercial opportunities.

4. Regulatory and Patent Factors
As a generic agent post-patent expiry of original formulations, Actigall faces intense pricing competition. Patent expirations, which occurred in many markets in the late 2010s, have driven generic penetration, reducing per-unit revenue but increasing volume-based sales.

5. Competitive Landscape and Formulation Developments
New formulations to enhance bioavailability, patient compliance, or targeted delivery could rejuvenate the product’s marketability. Strategic partnerships or formulation innovations serve as significant levers in maintaining competitiveness.


Financial Trajectory Analysis

1. Revenue Trends

Since patent expiry, the revenue for ursodiol products globally has transitioned from branded to predominantly generic markets. In the United States, sales peaked prior to patent expiration, followed by a decline, yet steady demand persists due to endemic need and established prescribing habits.[1]

Proprietary formulations or combination therapies may command premium pricing, whereas commoditized generic ursodiol faces downward pressure. The overall market revenue for ursodiol was estimated at approximately $200–300 million annually in North America and Europe before patent expiry, with a declining trend due to generics’ entry.

2. Cost Structures and Margins

Manufacturing costs for generic ursodiol are relatively low, with economies of scale contributing to healthy profit margins for major producers. However, intense price competition compresses margins, necessitating operational efficiencies and differentiated offerings for sustained profitability.

3. Market Expansion Opportunities

Emerging markets exhibit growing demand due to increasing urbanization, lifestyle-related risk factors, and expanding healthcare infrastructure. Entry into these markets via partnerships or licensing can diversify revenue streams and cushion impacts of mature markets’ saturation.

4. Investment in R&D and Innovation

Although ursodiol itself is a well-established molecule, incremental innovation, such as new delivery methods or combination formulations, can rejuvenate sales trajectories. Companies investing in such R&D initiatives may mitigate financial stagnation.

5. Impact of Regulatory Changes

Regulatory benchmarks strongly influence financial outcomes. Stringent quality standards and the push for biosimilars or substitutes may introduce market volatility. Conversely, regulatory acceptance of new indications can catalyze revenue growth.


Future Outlook and Market Forecasts

Forecasting indicates a moderate CAGR of approximately 2-4% over the next five years for the ursodiol segment, influenced by factors such as increased diagnosis of cholestatic liver diseases, expansion into emerging markets, and potential novel indications. However, the dominance of generics constrains revenue growth prospects, emphasizing the need for strategic innovation and market diversification.

The rise of biosimilars and targeted therapies in hepatology might also reshape the competitive landscape, presenting both threats and opportunities for ursodiol products. Collaborative efforts with research institutions and healthcare authorities are pivotal in identifying and validating new clinical uses.


Key Market Players and Competitive Dynamics

Major players such as Allergan, Teva, and Mylan have historically dominated generic ursodiol markets. Their strategies encompass direct price competition, formulation improvements, and marketing of branded versions with physician education. Intellectual property rights and regulatory approvals serve as critical battlegrounds influencing market share and profitability.

The entry of generic manufacturers has led to significant price erosion, prompting incumbent companies to explore ancillary services like personalized medicine approaches or value-added formulations.


Customer and Stakeholder Perspectives

Healthcare providers prioritize safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. With long-standing clinical experience, urso-based therapies benefit from robust safety profiles, but competing therapies and evolving guidelines also influence prescribing patterns.

Patients increasingly demand simplified dosing regimens and minimized side effects, incentivizing pharmaceutical companies to develop enhanced formulations or delivery systems that improve compliance and outcomes.


Conclusion and Strategic Implications

Actigall’s market and financial trajectory reflect a mature product landscape characterized by high generic competition, steady but limited growth, and opportunities driven by emerging indications. Firms aiming to extend revenue streams must innovate through formulation advancements, strategic geographic expansion, and the pursuit of new therapeutic labels.

Key considerations include leveraging its established safety profile, investing in clinical research for off-label uses, and exploring partnership opportunities in emerging markets. Additionally, vigilance regarding regulatory shifts and patent transitions remains essential for sustainable financial management.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Saturation: Post-patent expiration, ursodiol faces intense price competition with moderate growth prospects, necessitating innovation and differentiation.

  • Growing Demand Drivers: Increasing diagnosis of hepatobiliary diseases and expansion into emerging markets offer growth opportunities.

  • Innovation and Formulation: Developing enhanced delivery systems or combination therapies can stimulate demand beyond traditional indications.

  • Regulatory Environment: Compliance with evolving standards and pursuit of new indications are vital for market longevity.

  • Competitive Strategy: Maintaining market share requires balancing cost efficiencies, strategic partnerships, and clinical development initiatives.


Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the primary therapeutic indications for Actigall?
Actigall (ursodiol) is primarily prescribed for dissolving certain gallstones, preventing gallstone formation in high-risk patients, and treating primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Off-label uses are emerging but require further clinical validation.

2. How has patent expiry impacted the market for ursodiol?
Patent expiry has led to the proliferation of generic competitors, reducing prices and margins for branded products. This shift has transitioned the market toward volume-based sales, emphasizing cost competitiveness over premium pricing.

3. What emerging markets present opportunities for ursodiol products?
Countries in Asia, Latin America, and parts of Africa exhibit increasing healthcare infrastructure and disease prevalence, offering expanding opportunities for ursodiol through local manufacturing, partnerships, or licensing agreements.

4. Are there ongoing developments to extend the clinical utility of ursodiol?
Research focuses on new formulations, such as sustained-release systems, and potential indications like NAFLD. However, regulatory approval hurdles and clinical validation are necessary before widespread adoption.

5. How can pharmaceutical companies sustain profitability in a highly competitive, mature market?
Innovation in formulation, exploring adjunct indications, geographical expansion, cost management, and fostering clinical partnerships are key strategies for maintaining profitability amid generic competition.


References

[1] National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Gallstones. Available at: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/gallstones.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.