Last Updated: May 13, 2026

ACETADOTE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Acetadote, and what generic alternatives are available?

Acetadote is a drug marketed by Cumberland Pharms and is included in one NDA. There are three patents protecting this drug and one Paragraph IV challenge.

This drug has eighteen patent family members in eleven countries.

The generic ingredient in ACETADOTE is acetylcysteine. There are three drug master file entries for this compound. Fifteen suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the acetylcysteine profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Acetadote

A generic version of ACETADOTE was approved as acetylcysteine by HOSPIRA on August 30th, 1994.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ACETADOTE?
  • What are the global sales for ACETADOTE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ACETADOTE?
Recent Clinical Trials for ACETADOTE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of Missouri-ColumbiaPhase 1
Shandong Provincial HospitalPhase 1
Central South UniversityPhase 1

See all ACETADOTE clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for ACETADOTE
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
ACETADOTE Injection acetylcysteine 200 mg/mL, 30 mL vials 021539 3 2012-04-04

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ACETADOTE

ACETADOTE is protected by three US patents and one FDA Regulatory Exclusivity.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Cumberland Pharms ACETADOTE acetylcysteine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021539-001 Jan 23, 2004 AP RX Yes Yes 9,327,028 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Cumberland Pharms ACETADOTE acetylcysteine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021539-001 Jan 23, 2004 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Cumberland Pharms ACETADOTE acetylcysteine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021539-001 Jan 23, 2004 AP RX Yes Yes 8,722,738 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Cumberland Pharms ACETADOTE acetylcysteine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021539-001 Jan 23, 2004 AP RX Yes Yes 8,148,356 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for ACETADOTE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Cumberland Pharms ACETADOTE acetylcysteine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021539-001 Jan 23, 2004 8,399,445 ⤷  Start Trial
Cumberland Pharms ACETADOTE acetylcysteine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021539-001 Jan 23, 2004 8,653,061 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

International Patents for ACETADOTE

See the table below for patents covering ACETADOTE around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Canada 2619441 COMPOSITION D'ACETYLCYSTEINE ET SES UTILISATIONS (ACETYLCYSTEINE COMPOSITION AND USES THEREFOR) ⤷  Start Trial
China 103038356 Acetycysteine compositions and methods of use thereof ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 2009506030 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2006282030 Acetylcysteine composition and uses therefor ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration
Last updated: April 24, 2026

What are the market dynamics and financial trajectory for ACETADOTE?

Acetadote is the U.S. brand name for acetylcysteine (N-acetylcysteine, “NAC”) used as an antidote for acetaminophen (paracetamol) overdose and for other indications (notably as a mucolytic in other geographies and products). Market dynamics for “ACETADOTE” are driven less by patent-led brand power and more by: (1) procurement channels (hospital and government buying), (2) competitor parity of acetylcysteine supply and pricing, (3) FDA/labeling-driven demand triggers (acetaminophen overdose incidence, clinical protocols), and (4) generic substitution where exclusivity has lapsed.

Financial trajectory for the product line under “Acetadote” is therefore typically shaped by pricing compression, periodic supply constraints, and formulary dynamics rather than sustained monetization growth from long-lived exclusivities. In most markets, acetylcysteine is widely available, which pressures margins after branded differentiation ends.

Core point: ACETADOTE’s market and financial path follows the economics of an established hospital antidote with multiple manufacturer sources, where demand is recurrent but not expandable through marketing in the same way as specialty therapeutics.


What market forces shape ACETADOTE demand?

1) Indication concentration and protocol inertia

Acetaminophen overdose is the key demand driver in the U.S. NAC antidote use is protocolized in emergency departments and poison-control pathways. This creates stable baseline utilization but limits upside growth because prescribers follow established dosing algorithms and stock levels.

Net effect: demand is steady rather than growth-catalyzed, so revenue tends to track hospital volume, payer contracting, and unit price.

2) Hospital procurement and contract pricing

Hospital sales for antidotes are dominated by:

  • Group purchasing organization (GPO) contracts
  • IDN formularies (integrated delivery networks)
  • Direct purchasing in high-acuity settings

Net effect: list price is less predictive than contract price and rebate structure. As more suppliers enter, hospitals shift volume to the lowest total cost of acquisition.

3) Generic and alternate-source competition

Acetylcysteine is a mature active ingredient. Once branded exclusivity ends, generic versions and authorized distributors increase competitive intensity. Even when the molecule is the same, unit economics vary by:

  • vial/batch costs
  • distribution rebates
  • supply assurance terms
  • shipping and storage constraints

Net effect: pricing pressure and margin compression are common once multiple sources are established.

4) Supply availability as a short-term revenue swing factor

For hospital products, shortages or constrained manufacturing can cause temporary price changes and allocation. Conversely, improved supply from additional manufacturers can push prices down.

Net effect: revenue can show quarter-to-quarter variability from supply conditions rather than from demand expansion.


How does ACETADOTE compete and what does that do to pricing?

Competitive positioning

“Acetadote” is a branded NAC product. In practice, it competes on:

  • formulary access
  • contract pricing
  • dependable supply
  • consistent presentation and concentration used in clinical protocols

Pricing trajectory pattern (typical for mature hospital antidotes)

A mature hospital antidote with multi-source acetylcysteine typically follows a pattern:

  • early premium period (when branded supply is preferred and competition is limited)
  • mid-period pressure (generic entry and contracting)
  • later floor (pricing anchored to generic economics and procurement terms)

Operational implication for investors and R&D partners: growth is usually capped to procurement-driven share changes and occasional supply disruptions, not to durable price uplift.


What is the likely financial trajectory for ACETADOTE?

Revenue shape

Without relying on a speculative unit-growth story, the financial trajectory for “Acetadote” is most consistent with:

  • flat-to-declining revenue after generic/authorized competition expands
  • occasional recoveries tied to supply constraints, contract renewals, or temporary allocation

Margin outlook

Hospital antidotes are typically:

  • low-margin relative to specialty injectables
  • sensitive to manufacturing cost swings and raw material availability
  • exposed to price-per-unit erosion over time

So the likely margin path is:

  • initially higher gross margin for branded periods
  • then compression as ASP or contracted net price falls
  • limited ability to offset through marketing spend or patient expansion

Cash flow drivers

Cash flow for a mature antidote brand usually depends on:

  • working capital (inventory build during contracting periods)
  • logistics costs (cold chain is not generally central for NAC, but delivery reliability matters)
  • settlement mechanics (returns, chargebacks, rebates)

What regulatory and label dynamics influence the market?

FDA label stability

When the label is stable, demand is driven more by clinical practice than by regulatory changes. NAC dosing for acetaminophen overdose is established and widely taught.

Exclusivity and IP

For mature acetylcysteine brands, the key financial swing factor is whether branded exclusivity (or any formulation/manufacturing IP) still supports premium pricing. Once exclusivity expires and generics compete, the brand’s financial trajectory typically becomes a contracting exercise.


What benchmarks and metrics matter for tracking ACETADOTE performance?

For a hospital antidote, the actionable metrics are:

  • ASP vs. contract net price (price erosion indicator)
  • Unit volume by quarter (demand vs. share shift)
  • GPO and IDN formulary placement (share capture mechanism)
  • Supplier count and market availability (supply-induced price variance)
  • gross margin trend (manufacturing and rebate pressure)

A typical “mature antidote” signal set looks like:

  • volume stable or mildly down
  • net price down over time
  • margins compressing
  • intermittent spikes from shortages or allocation

Key Takeaways

  • ACETADOTE market dynamics are dominated by protocolized hospital use for acetaminophen overdose and procurement-driven contracting, not by specialty-style adoption growth.
  • Financial trajectory is typically flat-to-declining revenue with pricing compression once multi-source acetylcysteine competition increases.
  • Short-term quarter-to-quarter swings are most often tied to supply conditions and contract renewals, not label expansion.
  • The most decision-relevant tracking metrics are contract net pricing, unit volume, formulary placement, gross margin, and supply availability.

FAQs

1) What drives ACETADOTE demand in the U.S.?

Acetaminophen overdose incidence and hospital/poison-control protocols that standardize NAC antidote use.

2) Does ACETADOTE have the same growth levers as specialty drugs?

No. Growth is constrained by established clinical protocols, hospital procurement cycles, and generic substitution dynamics.

3) What competition pressures ACETADOTE the most?

Authorized and generic acetylcysteine sources that shift purchasing to lower total acquisition cost through GPO and IDN contracting.

4) What explains short-term revenue volatility for ACETADOTE-like products?

Manufacturing availability, allocation, and timing of contract renewals that alter net prices and purchase volumes.

5) Which financial line items matter most when monitoring ACETADOTE?

Net price (ASP-to-contract spread), gross margin, unit volume trends, and rebate/chargeback dynamics tied to hospital buying programs.


References

  1. FDA. “Drug Safety and Availability” and related FDA labeling resources for acetylcysteine/NAC products (accessed via FDA drug databases).
  2. FDA. Acetaminophen overdose treatment information and NAC antidote dosing guidance contained in FDA labeling for acetylcysteine products (accessed via FDA labeling).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.