You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for sular


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


sular

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Covis SULAR nisoldipine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 020356 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Prasco Laboratories 66993-472-02 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (66993-472-02) / 100 TABLET, FILM COATED, EXTENDED RELEASE in 1 BOTTLE 2012-02-27
Covis SULAR nisoldipine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 020356 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Prasco Laboratories 66993-473-02 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (66993-473-02) / 100 TABLET, FILM COATED, EXTENDED RELEASE in 1 BOTTLE 2012-02-27
Covis SULAR nisoldipine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 020356 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Prasco Laboratories 66993-475-02 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (66993-475-02) / 100 TABLET, FILM COATED, EXTENDED RELEASE in 1 BOTTLE 2012-02-27
Covis SULAR nisoldipine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 020356 NDA Covis Pharma US, Inc 70515-500-10 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (70515-500-10) / 100 TABLET, FILM COATED, EXTENDED RELEASE in 1 BOTTLE 2017-02-03
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug SULAR (nisoldipine)

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What are the primary manufacturing sources of SULAR (nisoldipine)?

SULAR, the brand name for nisoldipine, is a calcium channel blocker used primarily for hypertension management. As a branded pharmaceutical, its supply chain involves original manufacturers and authorized generic producers.

Origin and Manufacturing of SULAR

  • Original Manufacturer: Pfizer Inc. developed and marketed SULAR in the United States.
  • Approval Date: FDA approved SULAR in 1989.
  • Manufacturing Facilities: Pfizer operated manufacturing plants in the United States and internationally, primarily in Puerto Rico and Spain.

Current Supply Chain and Licensing

  • Brand Availability: Pfizer retains the rights to manufacture SULAR in certain regions.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Since patent expiration, multiple pharmaceutical companies have entered the market producing generic nisoldipine.
  • Official Suppliers: Generics approved by regulatory agencies such as the FDA, EMA, and other regional authorities.

Key Generic Suppliers in the Market

Since the expiration of Pfizer’s patent on nisoldipine in 2010, several companies have obtained approval for manufacturing and marketing generic versions. These include:

Company Region Notes
Teva Pharmaceuticals Global Market leader in generic pharmaceuticals
Mylan (now part of Viatris) Global Significant supplier, extensive distribution network
Sandoz (Novartis) Global Known for robust manufacturing and supply chain
Sun Pharmaceutical Asia, global Large focus on emerging markets
Apotex North America, global Approved for North American markets

Note: These companies produce generic nisoldipine formulations marketed under various brand names or as unbranded generics.

Regulatory Status

  • FDA: Multiple generics approved and listed via the FDA’s Orange Book.
  • EMA: Approved in Europe, with several generics authorized.
  • Other Regions: Approval status varies; some countries may have local suppliers or import restrictions.

Supply Chain Constraints and Risks

  • Manufacturing Disruptions: Given the generic proliferation, supply has typically been stable. However, quality issues, manufacturing recalls, or geopolitical factors may affect availability.
  • Patent Considerations: Pfizer’s patent expiration broadened supply options but varies regionally.

Conclusion

The primary suppliers of SULAR are Pfizer (original manufacturer) and multiple generic producers such as Teva, Mylan, Sandoz, Sun Pharma, and Apotex. The market is characterized by widespread generic production following patent expiration, with supply stability generally maintained through a diverse manufacturer base.

Key Takeaways

  • Pfizer remains the original producer of SULAR but does not dominate the generic market.
  • Generics are available from numerous companies, including Teva and Mylan.
  • Regulatory approval in major markets ensures multiple supply sources.
  • Regional differences impact supplier prevalence and availability.
  • Supply disruptions are rare but possible due to manufacturing or regulatory issues.

FAQs

  1. Who originally developed SULAR?
    Pfizer developed and marketed SULAR starting in 1989.

  2. Can I find generic versions of nisoldipine?
    Yes; multiple companies produce generic nisoldipine approved in various markets.

  3. Which companies are the leading generic suppliers?
    Teva, Mylan (Viatris), Sandoz, Sun Pharma, and Apotex are among the top producers.

  4. Is SULAR still manufactured by Pfizer?
    Pfizer's manufacturing of SULAR is limited; the original patent has expired, and generics dominate the market.

  5. Are there regional differences in SULAR suppliers?
    Yes; regulatory approvals and regional patents influence local supplier options.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book).
  2. European Medicines Agency. (2023). Listing of authorized medicines.
  3. IQVIA. (2022). Global Pharmaceutical Market Data.
  4. patent and drug approval database. (2023). Regional approval details.
  5. WHO. (2021). List of Essential Medicines.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.