Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for RAMIPRIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


RAMIPRIL

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd RAMIPRIL ramipril CAPSULE;ORAL 091604 ANDA A-S Medication Solutions 50090-1120-0 30 CAPSULE in 1 BOTTLE (50090-1120-0) 2011-06-08
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd RAMIPRIL ramipril CAPSULE;ORAL 091604 ANDA A-S Medication Solutions 50090-1120-1 90 CAPSULE in 1 BOTTLE (50090-1120-1) 2011-06-08
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd RAMIPRIL ramipril CAPSULE;ORAL 091604 ANDA A-S Medication Solutions 50090-3873-0 100 CAPSULE in 1 BOTTLE (50090-3873-0) 2011-06-08
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd RAMIPRIL ramipril CAPSULE;ORAL 091604 ANDA A-S Medication Solutions 50090-5673-0 30 CAPSULE in 1 BOTTLE (50090-5673-0) 2011-06-08
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Who Supplies Ramipril (API and Finished Dosage) and What to Verify in Procurement

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What does the market supply chain for ramipril look like?

Ramipril is supplied through two parallel channels: active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and finished dosage forms (FDF). Procurement decisions typically hinge on whether you need (1) ramipril API for formulation and (2) approved finished products for distribution or clinical use. The supplier set differs by channel because API supply is dominated by CMOs and API manufacturers with DMF/CEP coverage, while finished products come from brand and generic manufacturers with regulatory dossiers per jurisdiction.

Which suppliers commonly support ramipril API procurement?

Ramipril API suppliers are typically multinational API manufacturers and Indian/Chinese API producers that file drug master files (DMFs) for global customers and hold certifications tied to GMP manufacturing. In practice, the “supplier universe” for ramipril API procurement is defined by:

  • GMP status (typically EU GMP and/or FDA cGMP capability)
  • DMF availability and cross-reference capability for specific plants
  • Particle specification controls that affect tablet/capsule performance (assay, polymorph control where applicable, water content)
  • Timely release testing and stability program alignment to your shelf-life requirements

Procurement-ready supplier categories for ramipril API

  • API manufacturers with DMFs/CEP coverage: supply bulk ramipril substance to multiple downstream FDF makers.
  • Contract API manufacturers (CMO): perform final API steps and batch release against agreed specs.
  • API distributors: trade-supply API from manufacturer networks with their own QA release; used when you need short lead times or local availability.

Which suppliers commonly support ramipril finished dosage procurement?

Finished ramipril is widely marketed for cardiovascular indications. The supplier landscape includes:

  • Brand holders and licensees (where they exist in a given market)
  • Large generic manufacturers with EU/FDA/UK approvals across multiple strengths
  • Regional generics with market-specific dossiers

Finished product procurement typically depends on:

  • Strength set (ramipril 1.25 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg are common)
  • Dosage form (tablet; sometimes scored variants)
  • Labeling language and pack configuration by country
  • Regulatory pathway alignment (bioequivalence status, reference listed drug linkage where relevant)

What exact checks matter for ramipril suppliers in due diligence?

For ramipril API and FDF procurement, the operational checks that change quality outcomes are consistent across markets:

API checks (buyers typically require)

  • GMP certificate for the specific manufacturing site
  • DMF number and letter-of-access status for the API plant
  • CoA and test method details for each batch (assay, impurities, water content as applicable, residual solvents where relevant)
  • Impurity profile alignment to your target spec (and regulatory norms used by your dossier)
  • Stability data for your intended expiry (real-time and accelerated where applicable)
  • Change control history for polymorph/solid-state changes (if relevant to your grade and supplier)

Finished product checks

  • Regulatory approval evidence in the target country
  • Manufacturing authorization for the specific site on the certificate of analysis/packing release
  • Batch traceability and release testing scope
  • Bioequivalence status (for generics) where required for your market
  • Packaging integrity and cold-chain handling requirements (usually none for ramipril tablets, but confirm)

How to map suppliers to your procurement strategy

You can treat suppliers as interchangeable only after confirming dossier and spec alignment. A practical mapping framework:

If you need API for in-house formulation

Prioritize API suppliers that can provide:

  • Plant-specific DMF/CEP and QA documentation
  • Consistent impurity profile across consecutive lots
  • A stability package aligned to your intended shelf-life
  • Rapid CoA turnaround and change-control transparency

If you need finished tablets for distribution

Prioritize FDF suppliers that can provide:

  • Market approval status (local MA number)
  • Pack and strength coverage for your demand curve
  • Certificate of release and QA/QC documentation per batch
  • Supply reliability across multiple calendar quarters

What procurement documents and specs should you demand from any ramipril supplier?

Minimum document set used by serious buyers:

  • GMP certificate (site-specific)
  • DMF/CEP evidence (API) or MA/registration evidence (FDF)
  • DMF letter of access (if your dossier cross-references)
  • Full CoA (per batch), including impurity panel and residual solvents (where applicable)
  • Specification sheet (API and, separately, FDF)
  • Stability protocol summary and last available results
  • Statement on change control notifications
  • Packaging specification (for FDF), including serialization where required

Key Takeaways

  • Ramipril is supplied through an API-first model for manufacturers and a multi-issuer generic/FDF model for distributors.
  • Supplier qualification for ramipril should be driven by plant-specific GMP, DMF/CEP or local marketing authorization, and batch-level documentation that demonstrates impurity and quality consistency.
  • Procurement success depends on dossier readiness (DMF/letter-of-access for API; MA and release testing for FDF), not just commercial availability.

FAQs

  1. What matters most when choosing a ramipril API supplier? Plant-specific GMP, DMF/CEP accessibility, and batch impurity profile consistency.
  2. Can ramipril be sourced from multiple API suppliers for the same product? Yes only after confirming your formulation and dossier specs match supplier-grade characteristics and impurity limits across lots.
  3. What documents should a ramipril finished dosage supplier provide? Country-specific regulatory approval evidence, site GMP authorization, batch CoA, and release-testing scope.
  4. Are ramipril tablet supplies typically temperature sensitive? Ramipril tablets are generally shipped without cold-chain requirements, but batch handling instructions should be confirmed with the supplier’s packaging spec.
  5. What typically causes supply disruptions in ramipril? API plant capacity constraints, DMF access delays, and batch release issues related to impurity or documentation completeness.

References

[1] FDA. “Drug Master Files (DMFs).” U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/forms-submissions/drug-master-files-dmfs
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). “Certificates of Suitability (CEPs).” European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/marketing-authorisation/certificates-suitability
[3] European Commission. “EudraGMDP: The EU database for manufacturing and import authorisation.” European Commission. https://health.ec.europa.eu/medicinal-products/eudragmdp_en

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.