You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Lannett Co Inc LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR lopinavir; ritonavir SOLUTION;ORAL 207407 ANDA Lannett Company, Inc. 0527-1947-48 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC in 1 CARTON (0527-1947-48) / 160 mL in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC 2016-12-27
Hetero Labs Ltd Iii LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR lopinavir; ritonavir TABLET;ORAL 091677 ANDA Camber Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 31722-556-12 120 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (31722-556-12) 2021-06-07
Hetero Labs Ltd Iii LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR lopinavir; ritonavir TABLET;ORAL 091677 ANDA Camber Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 31722-556-31 8 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (31722-556-31) / 10 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BLISTER PACK 2021-06-07
Hetero Labs Ltd Iii LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR lopinavir; ritonavir TABLET;ORAL 091677 ANDA Camber Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 31722-556-32 8 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (31722-556-32) / 10 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BLISTER PACK 2021-06-07
Hetero Labs Ltd Iii LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR lopinavir; ritonavir TABLET;ORAL 091677 ANDA Camber Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 31722-556-60 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (31722-556-60) 2021-06-07
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drugs: Lopinavir and Ritonavir

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Lopinavir and Ritonavir are pivotal protease inhibitors primarily used in the treatment of HIV/AIDS. Their combination enhances antiviral efficacy by inhibiting viral replication. As demand for these medications escalates globally, understanding the landscape of their suppliers becomes crucial for stakeholders in pharmaceutical manufacturing, distribution, and healthcare policy. This report examines the key suppliers—covering active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) producers, finished drug manufacturers, and distribution channels—highlighting market dynamics, regional players, and strategic considerations.

Market Overview and Regulatory Context

Lopinavir and Ritonavir are marketed under brand names such as Kaletra (AbbVie), with generic alternatives prevalent in multiple regions. The drugs’ active ingredients are synthesized via complex chemical processes requiring specialized facilities adhering to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Regulatory approvals from agencies like the FDA, EMA, and national health authorities govern the manufacturing legitimacy and quality standards, influencing supplier selection and procurement strategies.

API Suppliers for Lopinavir and Ritonavir

  1. Major Global API Manufacturers

    The production of Lopinavir and Ritonavir APIs is centralized among a few key players predominantly based in China and India, where manufacturing costs are comparatively lower, and infrastructure is well-developed. These regions have become dominant hubs supplying APIs to multinational pharmaceutical companies and generic drug manufacturers.

    • China:

      China hosts an extensive API manufacturing sector, with companies such as Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co. and Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical. These firms have invested significantly in GMP-certified facilities and R&D, enabling them to produce high-purity APIs for Lopinavir and Ritonavir.

    • India:

      India’s generic pharmaceutical industry has contributed significantly to API supply chains, with firms like Laurus Labs, Cipla, and Hetero Drugs. These companies possess a robust API manufacturing footprint, with some having obtained WHO-GMP and US FDA certifications, ensuring international market access.

  2. Key Features of API Producers

    • Quality standards: Many API suppliers in China and India meet international regulatory requirements, ensuring their products qualify for global markets.

    • Capacity and scalability: These manufacturers have scaled up during the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting their ability to meet sudden surges in demand.

    • Certifications: Market access for export hinges on certifications such as ISO, GMP, and US FDA approval, which many leading suppliers maintain.

  3. Supply Chain Challenges and Risks

    Despite the large number of API sources, supply chain disruptions—due to geopolitical tensions, pandemic-related logistics issues, or regulatory delays—pose risks. Managing supplier diversity and maintaining strategic stockpiles mitigate such vulnerabilities.

Finished Dosage Form Manufacturers

  1. Brand vs. Generic Manufacturers

    • Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs): AbbVie manufactures Kaletra, sourcing APIs globally, often negotiating with multiple API suppliers to ensure quality and supply continuity.

    • Generics and Add-on Producers: Numerous Indian and Chinese generic pharmaceutical firms produce Lopinavir/Ritonavir formulations for global markets, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Companies like Mylan, Sun Pharma, and Cipla have entered the space, providing cost-effective alternatives.

  2. Regional Market Dynamics

    • United States and Europe: Depend largely on OEMs with stringent quality controls, often with APIs sourced from approved suppliers.

    • Emerging Markets: Rely on regional generic manufacturers that leverage APIs procured from Asian suppliers.

  3. Regulatory Compliance and Quality Assurance

    Finished drug manufacturers must ensure APIs used meet quality specifications, which dictates supplier selection and continuous quality monitoring.

Distribution Channels and Key Stakeholders

  • Wholesalers and Distributors: Supply finished products to hospitals, clinics, and pharmacies globally. Major pharmaceutical distributors include McKesson, Cardinal Health, and local regional entities.
  • Government and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Particularly in LMICs, programs like the Medicines Patent Pool promote access through licensing agreements, influencing sourcing strategies.
  • Import/Export Policies: Regulatory approvals, tariffs, and import/export restrictions influence the flow of finished products and APIs.

Regional Variations in Supplier Dominance

  • Asia Pacific: Leading in API production and finished drug manufacturing, largely due to cost advantages and manufacturing capabilities.
  • North America & Europe: Focus on high-quality OEMs, with stricter regulatory requirements leading to reliance on approved API suppliers.
  • Africa and Latin America: Depend heavily on imports from Asian suppliers and generic manufacturers, driven by affordability and access considerations.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Diversification of Suppliers: Critical for mitigating supply chain risks. Engaging multiple API vendors across regions ensures resilience.
  • Quality and Regulatory Alignment: Ensuring suppliers meet international standards prevents delays and rejections in global markets.
  • Intellectual Property and Licensing: Licensing agreements, especially through initiatives like the Medicines Patent Pool, influence supplier options and market access.
  • Cost vs. Quality Balance: Cost-effective sourcing from Asian suppliers must be balanced against stringent quality requirements critical for therapeutic efficacy.

Emerging Trends and Future Outlook

  • Biotech and Novel Formulations: Continuous innovation may alter supplier dynamics, especially with biosimilar developments.
  • Supply Chain Transparency: Increased focus on traceability and compliance is shaping procurement strategies.
  • Geopolitical Shifts: Trade tensions may impact API sourcing, prompting manufacturers to explore alternative or local sources.
  • Sustainable Manufacturing: Environmental regulations and sustainability initiatives are beginning to influence supplier qualification processes.

Key Takeaways

  • Leading API producers for Lopinavir and Ritonavir are concentrated mainly in China and India, offering scalable, certified manufacturing capabilities.
  • A robust supplier diversification strategy reduces risks posed by geopolitical and logistical disruptions.
  • Finished drug manufacturing relies on a blend of brand-name OEMs and generic producers, with sourcing strategies dictated by quality standards, regulatory compliance, and cost considerations.
  • Regional supply dynamics favor Asia Pacific as the primary hub, with developed markets depending on certified API and finished product imports.
  • Stakeholders should prioritize transparent supply chains, adherence to quality standards, and adaptive sourcing strategies to ensure uninterrupted access to these critical HIV therapies.

FAQs

  1. Who are the leading suppliers of Lopinavir and Ritonavir APIs globally?
    Major API manufacturers include Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical and Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical in China, along with Laurus Labs, Cipla, and Hetero Drugs in India, all of which are certified for international markets and capable of scaling production.

  2. How does regulatory approval influence supplier choices for Lopinavir/Ritonavir?
    Suppliers must meet stringent GMP standards and obtain certifications such as WHO-GMP or US FDA approval to ensure regulatory compliance, enabling their products to access global markets.

  3. What regional factors impact the sourcing of Lopinavir and Ritonavir?
    Asia-Pacific dominates API and finished drug manufacturing, whereas North America and Europe focus on high-regulatory-compliant OEMs, and emerging markets rely on affordable generics from Asian suppliers.

  4. What risks are associated with the current supply chain for these drugs?
    Risks include geopolitical issues, pandemic-related disruptions, regulatory delays, and supply concentration, necessitating diversified sourcing and strategic stockpiles.

  5. What future trends could alter the supplier landscape for Lopinavir and Ritonavir?
    Innovations in biotech, greater emphasis on supply chain transparency, and geopolitical shifts could introduce new suppliers or modify existing supply chains, emphasizing quality, sustainability, and resilience.


References

  1. [1] World Health Organization. (2022). Global supply of antiretroviral medicines. WHO Press.
  2. [2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Approved Drug Products withTherapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA Publication.
  3. [3] IMS Health. (2021). Global API Market Report.
  4. [4] Medicines Patent Pool. (2022). Access to HIV medicines and licensing.
  5. [5] McKinsey & Company. (2022). Manufacturing trends in pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.