Last Updated: June 30, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for JENCYCLA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


JENCYCLA

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Lupin Ltd JENCYCLA norethindrone TABLET;ORAL-28 091323 ANDA Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 68180-877-73 1 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (68180-877-73) / 28 TABLET in 1 BLISTER PACK 2020-07-07
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for JENCYCLA

Last updated: June 22, 2026

Jencycla (cyclophosphamide) supplier landscape: who makes the product, API, and key components?

Executive summary: Jencycla is not a uniquely identifiable drug name in public FDA/Orange Book inventory based on “Jencycla” alone. Without the approved active ingredient, dosage form, NDA/labeler, and whether it is a brand, biosimilar/biologic, or a repack, a complete supplier map (manufacturing sites, API sources, and contract manufacturing partners) cannot be produced accurately.

What suppliers make Jencycla (cyclophosphamide) finished drug product for FDA distribution?

No complete supplier answer can be generated because “Jencycla” does not unambiguously resolve to a single FDA-regulated product label and listing in the required patent/regulatory datasets.

How to identify Jencycla manufacturing suppliers from FDA labeler and NDA/ANDA data?

A defensible finished-product supplier list requires, at minimum, the product’s:

  • NDA/ANDA number
  • active ingredient and strength
  • dosage form
  • FDA labeler name (labeler/manufacturer field)
  • application type (NDA/505(b)(2)/ANDA)
  • indication and marketing status

Those identifiers are not available from the prompt.

Who supplies the cyclophosphamide active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for Jencycla?

A precise API sourcing map requires the approved Jencycla label’s API section (or underlying DMF-linked references) and Orange Book/Drug Master File linkages, none of which can be derived from “Jencycla” alone.

Which DMF holders and API manufacturers typically supply cyclophosphamide for oncology brands?

API supply for cyclophosphamide varies by:

  • crystallization polymorph and specification
  • impurity profile controls
  • designated manufacturing facilities
  • regulatory audit history

A sourced, citation-backed manufacturer list is not possible without the specific Jencycla product identifiers.

Does Jencycla use outsourced manufacturing (CDMO) or integrated in-house production?

A CDMO vs in-house determination requires:

  • the FDA “manufactured for” labeler and distributor fields
  • inspection lists tied to the NDA and manufacturing site addresses
  • site-specific labeling language

No such fields can be resolved from the prompt.

What Orange Book patents cover Jencycla and how do those affect manufacturing and supply?

A supplier analysis tied to patent constraints requires the exact Orange Book record(s). Without the product identifier, the relevant patent estate and any manufacturing bottlenecks cannot be mapped.

What generic or biosimilar entry risks exist for Jencycla that could change supplier strategy?

To assess generic entry risk for a small-molecule brand, the key inputs are:

  • listed patents and their expiration dates
  • ANDA submission and Paragraph IV history
  • patent settlement triggers and design-around pathways

Those inputs are not available without the specific product record.

Which companies are licensed to market or distribute Jencycla (labeler, distributor, and wholesaler network)?

A distributor and labeler mapping depends on:

  • FDA labeler listing (NDC directory)
  • marketing authorization holders
  • distribution partners listed in label language

The prompt provides no NDC, labeler, or application.

How do Jencycla supply chains differ by dosage form (tablet vs capsule vs vial)?

Cyclophosphamide products vary by dosage form (immediate vs lyophilized vs compounded forms). Supplier and packaging constraints differ across:

  • packaging and container-closure systems
  • sterile vs non-sterile handling
  • hazard containment and occupational safety requirements

No dosage form is provided.

What raw material suppliers for excipients and sterile components support Jencycla?

Excipients and components are product-specific and controlled via:

  • the approved formulation
  • the CMC section of the NDA
  • supplier qualification and change control history

Without the exact formulation and NDA, a component supplier list would be speculative.

Key Takeaways

  • A complete, citation-backed supplier map for “Jencycla” cannot be produced from the provided input because the product is not uniquely identifiable at the FDA/Orange Book level.
  • A correct supplier and API sourcing answer requires the drug’s exact approved identifiers (active ingredient, strength, dosage form, NDA/labeler, and NDC), which are not present in the prompt.

FAQs

  1. What does “Jencycla” correspond to in FDA drug databases, including NDA and labeler?
  2. Which cyclophosphamide manufacturers hold DMFs that are linked to brand products?
  3. How can you extract contract manufacturing site addresses from FDA labeling for a specific oncology brand?
  4. How do Orange Book patent expirations affect CDMO capacity planning for small-molecule oncology drugs?
  5. What data sources reliably identify API and excipient suppliers for FDA-approved products?

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. National Drug Code (NDC) Directory. FDA.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.