You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: DAPAGLIFLOZIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


DAPAGLIFLOZIN

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin TABLET;ORAL 202293 NDA AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP 0310-6205-30 30 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (0310-6205-30) 2008-01-14
Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin TABLET;ORAL 202293 NDA AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP 0310-6205-90 90 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (0310-6205-90) 2008-01-14
Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin TABLET;ORAL 202293 NDA AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP 0310-6205-95 1 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (0310-6205-95) / 7 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BLISTER PACK 2008-01-14
Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin TABLET;ORAL 202293 NDA AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP 0310-6210-30 30 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (0310-6210-30) 2008-01-14
Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin TABLET;ORAL 202293 NDA AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP 0310-6210-39 3 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (0310-6210-39) / 10 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BLISTER PACK 2008-01-14
Astrazeneca Ab FARXIGA dapagliflozin TABLET;ORAL 202293 NDA AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP 0310-6210-90 90 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (0310-6210-90) 2008-01-14
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Dapagliflozin

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Dapagliflozin, marketed primarily under the brand name Farxiga among others, is a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor used primarily for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since its approval, dapagliflozin has become a critical component of diabetes treatment regimes, driven by its mechanism of promoting glucose excretion via the kidneys. Securing reliable suppliers for dapagliflozin is essential for pharmaceutical manufacturers, healthcare providers, and distributors to ensure consistent drug availability, quality, and cost-effectiveness.

This article offers a comprehensive overview of the primary suppliers involved in dapagliflozin production, considering the manufacturing landscape, supply chain dynamics, and competitive positioning. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the global supply chain to mitigate risks such as shortages, quality issues, or regulatory compliance challenges.


Global Manufacturing Landscape of Dapagliflozin

Dapagliflozin is a complex small-molecule drug produced through intricate chemical synthesis involving multiple stages, including raw material procurement, chemical reactions, purification, and formulation. The synthesis relies heavily on high-quality chemical precursors and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturing capabilities. Currently, the supply chain for dapagliflozin is characterized by a limited number of key API producers, given the high-entry barriers associated with pharmaceutical manufacturing, stringent regulatory standards, and intellectual property protections.

Major API Suppliers for Dapagliflozin

1. AstraZeneca and Its Contract Manufacturing Partners

AstraZeneca developed dapagliflozin and is the exclusive originator of the molecule by patent rights. While AstraZeneca primarily handles global marketing and distribution, much of the API manufacturing is outsourced to various contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs). It is common in the pharmaceutical industry for originators to partner with multiple CMOs to ensure supply redundancy and meet global demand.

Key partners include:

  • Emcure Pharmaceuticals (India): Reports indicate that Emcure has established facilities capable of synthesizing dapagliflozin API as part of AstraZeneca’s supply chain, emphasizing India’s role as a significant API manufacturing hub.
  • Fresenius Kabi (Germany): Known for manufacturing APIs and injectable formulations, Fresenius Kabi is involved in different aspects of drug production, possibly including dapagliflozin intermediates or formulations [2].

Note: Direct confirmation regarding Fresenius Kabi's API production for dapagliflozin remains limited; however, their presence in diabetes-related APIs underscores their potential involvement.

2. Chinese API Manufacturers

China remains a pivotal player in the global API production landscape owing to cost advantages, manufacturing capacity, and regulatory acceptance. Several Chinese manufacturers either supply intermediates or active APIs for dapagliflozin under licensing agreements, partnerships, or independently.

Notable Chinese API suppliers include:

  • Shanghai Sunflower Pharmaceutical: Reported to produce dapagliflozin intermediates, leveraging advanced chemical synthesis capabilities.
  • Luye Pharma Group: Has been known to develop and manufacture APIs for various glucose-lowering drugs and may produce dapagliflozin intermediates or APIs under licensing arrangements.

Chinese API producers often operate under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards and increasingly seek export certifications to meet international regulatory standards [3].

3. Indian API Manufacturers

India is a leading global supplier of generic APIs and solid-dose pharmaceuticals. Several companies possess the capacity to manufacture dapagliflozin API, including but not limited to:

  • Macleods Pharmaceuticals: Reported to produce dapagliflozin API and formulations for domestic and export markets.
  • Hetero Drugs: Engaged in the manufacture of diverse pharmaceutical APIs, including APIs for diabetes medications.
  • Aurobindo Pharma: Known for API and finished-dose manufacturing, with capabilities potentially covering dapagliflozin.

Indian APIs benefit from competitive pricing, robust regulatory oversight (by Indian agencies such as CDSCO), and established export channels, making India a significant dapagliflozin API supplier [4].


Supply Chain Dynamics and Considerations

1. Manufacturing Challenges and Quality Assurance

The synthesis of dapagliflozin requires stringent quality control due to complex chemical reactions and the necessity to meet international GMP standards. Suppliers must maintain high purity levels and batch-to-batch consistency. Variability in raw material quality or process deviations can disrupt supply chains.

2. Regulatory Approvals

APIs sourced from China and India must adhere to regulatory standards of target markets, such as the U.S. FDA, EMA, or Japan’s PMDA. Suppliers with WHO prequalification or extensive regulatory track records are preferred for risk mitigation.

3. Supply Chain Risks

Dependence on a limited supplier base heightens vulnerabilities, including geopolitical risks, manufacturing disruptions, or raw material shortages. The ongoing shift towards diversifying suppliers and establishing dual sourcing strategies remains imperative for brand owners and distributors.

4. Cost and Competitive Dynamics

Cost containment drives procurement decisions, with Chinese and Indian manufacturers offering competitive prices. However, quality assurance and regulatory oversight remain critical evaluative criteria to balance cost with supply security.


Distribution and Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

Many pharmaceutical companies rely on CMOs globally to produce dapagliflozin, leveraging their specialized facilities and expertise. Noteworthy considerations include:

  • Contract transparency and compliance. CMOs like Emcure, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, or Aurobindo often work under confidentiality agreements and strict quality standards.
  • Capacity expansion. As demand grows, CMOs invest in expanding GMP-compliant manufacturing capacity to prevent shortages.
  • Technology transfer. Ensuring that manufacturing processes are effectively transferred and scaled between facilities mitigates risks of supply interruptions.

Emerging and Future Suppliers

With the global push for more accessible diabetes treatments, emerging players from South Korea, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe are increasingly entering the dapagliflozin supply chain, seeking GMP certification and regulatory approval. These new entrants aim to diversify supply sources further and reduce reliance on dominant markets.

Technological advancements like continuous manufacturing and process automation are encouraging new entrants to establish large-scale, high-quality API production for dapagliflozin.


Regulatory and Market Implications

Suppliers must adhere to evolving regulatory standards to access major markets like the U.S. and Europe. The FDA’s expedited review pathways, such as the Priority Review or Accelerated Approval, impact supply chain agility by requiring suppliers to demonstrate validated processes and supply chain integrity.

Pharmaceutical companies and buyers often perform rigorous supplier audits and require robust documentation to verify compliance, operational stability, and quality control.


Key Takeaways

  • The primary API suppliers for dapagliflozin are concentrated in India, China, and to a lesser extent, Europe, with AstraZeneca leveraging partnerships globally.
  • Ensuring supply security involves diversifying sources, particularly in high-demand settings, and verifying suppliers’ regulatory compliance.
  • Quality assurance, regulatory adherence, and raw material integrity are fundamental to stable dapagliflozin supply chains.
  • Emerging markets and new entrants are poised to increase competition, potentially lowering costs and expanding supply capacity.
  • Strategic procurement decisions should incorporate risk assessment, supplier track record, and regulatory standing to mitigate disruptions.

FAQs

  1. Who are the leading global suppliers of dapagliflozin API?
    Major suppliers include Indian companies like Macleods and Aurobindo, Chinese manufacturers such as Shanghai Sunflower Pharmaceutical, and partnerships of AstraZeneca with CMOs across various regions.

  2. What factors influence the choice of dapagliflozin suppliers?
    Key factors include regulatory compliance, manufacturing quality, production capacity, cost competitiveness, and supply stability.

  3. How does regulatory compliance impact dapagliflozin supply?
    Suppliers must meet stringent GMP standards and achieve approvals from agencies like the FDA and EMA. Non-compliance can lead to supply disruptions, sanctions, or market restrictions.

  4. Are there emerging markets for dapagliflozin APIs?
    Yes, countries across Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, and South Korea are increasingly entering the dapagliflozin API supply chain, driven by technological advancements and export ambitions.

  5. What risks exist in the dapagliflozin supply chain?
    Risks encompass raw material shortages, geopolitical tensions, manufacturing disruptions, regulatory non-compliance, and dependency on limited suppliers.


References

[1] AstraZeneca’s official statements and pipeline documentation.
[2] Industry reports on API manufacturing capacities in Europe.
[3] World Health Organization WHO prequalification list.
[4] Indian pharmaceutical industry reports from the Department of Pharmaceuticals, Government of India.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.