You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for AURYXIA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


AURYXIA

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Keryx Biopharms AURYXIA ferric citrate TABLET;ORAL 205874 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0378-2895-20 200 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0378-2895-20) 2025-03-20
Keryx Biopharms AURYXIA ferric citrate TABLET;ORAL 205874 NDA Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. 59922-631-01 200 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (59922-631-01) 2014-09-17
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

AURYXIA Supply Chain Analysis

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Auryxia (ferric citrate) is a phosphate binder used to treat hyperphosphatemia in adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis. The supply chain for Auryxia involves procurement of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), manufacturing of the finished dosage form, packaging, and distribution. Key suppliers and manufacturing sites are critical to ensuring consistent product availability.

Who Manufactures AURYXIA?

Auryxia is manufactured by Draxeon Pharmaceuticals, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. in 2017. Teva is responsible for the global manufacturing and commercialization of Auryxia.

  • Primary Manufacturer: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Previous Manufacturer/Developer: Keryx Biopharmaceuticals (now Draxeon Pharmaceuticals)

What Are the Key Raw Materials for AURYXIA?

The primary active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for Auryxia is ferric citrate. Excipients are also required for formulation.

  • Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API):
    • Ferric Citrate: This is the core component. Sourcing reliable, high-purity ferric citrate is essential.
  • Excipients: These are inactive ingredients used in the formulation of tablets. Specific excipients include:
    • Microcrystalline cellulose
    • Croscarmellose sodium
    • Magnesium stearate
    • Hypromellose
    • Titanium dioxide
    • Polyethylene glycol
    • Iron oxides (for coloring)

Who Supplies the Raw Materials for AURYXIA?

Teva, as the current owner and manufacturer, manages the procurement of raw materials. While specific supplier contracts are proprietary, major pharmaceutical API manufacturers globally are potential sources for ferric citrate and various excipients. Teva's global procurement strategy likely involves multiple qualified suppliers to mitigate risk.

  • Ferric Citrate Suppliers: Likely sourced from large-scale chemical manufacturers specializing in pharmaceutical intermediates or iron salts. Companies such as BASF, Lonza, or specialized API manufacturers in India and China are potential candidates. However, Teva's internal procurement data would confirm specific suppliers.
  • Excipient Suppliers: A broad range of excipient manufacturers supply the pharmaceutical industry. Global players like Roquette, Ashland, or Mallinckrodt are common suppliers for excipients used in solid dosage forms.

Where Is AURYXIA Manufactured?

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries operates a global network of manufacturing facilities. The specific site(s) producing Auryxia tablets are not publicly disclosed in detail, but generally, Teva utilizes its own facilities or contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) for its product portfolio.

  • Likely Manufacturing Locations: Teva's major pharmaceutical manufacturing hubs are located in:
    • United States: Significant manufacturing presence, particularly for products marketed in North America.
    • Europe: Facilities in countries like Israel, Germany, and the UK.
    • Asia: Manufacturing capabilities in India and China.

Teva's internal manufacturing strategy aims for geographic diversification to ensure supply chain resilience. For specialized formulations or specific drug products, CMOs may also be utilized if they meet stringent quality and regulatory standards.

What Are the Regulatory Requirements for AURYXIA Supply Chain?

The supply chain for Auryxia, like all pharmaceuticals, is subject to rigorous regulatory oversight by health authorities worldwide.

  • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP): All manufacturing sites for APIs and finished drug products must comply with GMP regulations (e.g., US FDA's 21 CFR Parts 210 & 211, EU GMP Guidelines).
  • Drug Master Files (DMFs): API suppliers typically file DMFs with regulatory agencies, providing confidential detailed information about the manufacturing process, facilities, and quality controls for the API.
  • API Sourcing and Qualification: Teva must qualify all API and excipient suppliers through audits and quality agreements, ensuring they meet Teva's specifications and regulatory requirements.
  • Supply Chain Security: Measures to prevent counterfeiting and ensure product integrity throughout distribution are mandated. This includes serialization and track-and-trace requirements.
  • Country-Specific Registrations: Compliance with import/export regulations and product registration requirements in each market where Auryxia is sold is necessary.

What Are the Potential Supply Chain Risks for AURYXIA?

The pharmaceutical supply chain for Auryxia, as with any branded drug, faces several inherent risks.

  • API Shortages: Dependence on a limited number of API suppliers or geopolitical disruptions affecting key API manufacturing regions (e.g., China, India) can lead to shortages.
  • Manufacturing Disruptions: Issues at a primary manufacturing site, whether due to equipment failure, quality deviations, or labor disputes, can halt production.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Changes in GMP requirements, failure to pass regulatory inspections, or delays in product approvals for new markets can impact supply.
  • Logistical Challenges: Transportation delays, customs issues, or cold chain disruptions (though less critical for a solid oral dosage form) can affect product delivery.
  • Quality Control Failures: Deviations from quality standards by API or excipient suppliers, or within the finished product manufacturing process, can lead to product recalls and supply interruptions.
  • Geopolitical Instability: Trade wars, political unrest, or natural disasters in regions where key suppliers or manufacturing sites are located can disrupt the supply chain.
  • Patent Expirations and Generics: While not a direct supply chain risk, the eventual expiration of patents for Auryxia will lead to generic competition. This can impact Teva's production volumes and strategic decisions regarding supply chain optimization.

How Does AURYXIA's Supply Chain Compare to Similar Drugs?

Auryxia's supply chain shares similarities with other oral solid dosage form medications. However, its specific API (ferric citrate) and its niche indication in hyperphosphatemia management can influence its supply chain characteristics.

  • Active Ingredient Complexity: Ferric citrate is a relatively common inorganic compound, unlike complex biologics or highly synthesized small molecules. This generally implies a broader base of potential API suppliers and potentially lower API cost volatility compared to highly specialized APIs.
  • Indication Niche: The treatment of hyperphosphatemia in CKD dialysis patients is a specialized market. This means production volumes for Auryxia might be lower than for blockbuster drugs treating more prevalent conditions, potentially impacting economies of scale for manufacturing and sourcing.
  • Manufacturer Scale: As part of Teva, Auryxia benefits from Teva's extensive global manufacturing infrastructure and established supply chain management systems. This is a significant advantage compared to drugs from smaller, independent pharmaceutical companies that may rely more heavily on CMOs.
  • Generic Competition Landscape: The market for phosphate binders includes other classes of drugs (e.g., calcium-based binders, sevelamer). The competitive landscape influences the pricing pressures and R&D investment, indirectly affecting supply chain investment decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, through its subsidiary Draxeon Pharmaceuticals, is the current manufacturer and commercializer of Auryxia.
  • The primary API is ferric citrate, with common pharmaceutical excipients used in its tablet formulation.
  • Specific raw material suppliers are proprietary to Teva, but global chemical and excipient manufacturers are likely sources.
  • Manufacturing likely occurs within Teva's global network of facilities, with a focus on North America and Europe.
  • The supply chain is governed by stringent GMP and regulatory requirements from agencies like the FDA and EMA.
  • Key risks include API shortages, manufacturing disruptions, and quality control failures.
  • Auryxia's supply chain is comparable to other oral solid dosage forms, with its specific API and market niche influencing its characteristics. Teva's scale provides robust supply chain management.

FAQs

  1. Is ferric citrate difficult to source? Ferric citrate is an inorganic compound with established manufacturing processes. While high-purity pharmaceutical-grade material requires specific quality controls, it is generally considered a more readily sourced API compared to complex organic molecules or biologics, with multiple potential suppliers globally.

  2. Does Teva use contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) for Auryxia? While Teva has a significant internal manufacturing capacity, it is common practice in the pharmaceutical industry for large companies to utilize CMOs for certain products or to supplement production. Teva's specific CMO utilization for Auryxia is not publicly disclosed, but it is a possibility to ensure flexibility and capacity.

  3. What happens if a key supplier of ferric citrate experiences production issues? Pharmaceutical companies like Teva typically qualify multiple suppliers for critical raw materials. If one supplier encounters production issues, Teva can pivot to an alternative, pre-qualified supplier to maintain production continuity. This requires robust supplier relationship management and ongoing quality assurance for all approved sources.

  4. Are there specific cold chain requirements for Auryxia? Auryxia is an oral solid dosage form (tablet). Such formulations typically do not require specialized cold chain storage or transportation. Standard controlled room temperature conditions are usually sufficient, simplifying logistical requirements compared to temperature-sensitive biologics.

  5. What is Teva's strategy for managing supply chain risks for Auryxia? Teva's general strategy for managing supply chain risks involves dual or multiple sourcing for critical raw materials, maintaining safety stock inventories, geographic diversification of manufacturing sites, robust quality agreements with suppliers, and continuous monitoring of geopolitical and regulatory landscapes. Specific risk mitigation plans for Auryxia would be part of Teva's internal operational management.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). 21 CFR Part 210 - Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Processing, Packaging, or Holding of Drugs; General. U.S. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved from https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-210 [2] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). EudraLex - Volume 4 - Good Manufacturing Practice. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://health.ec.europa.eu/medicinal-products/eudralex/eudralex-volume-4_en [3] Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (2023). Annual Report 2023. (Report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission). [4] Keryx Biopharmaceuticals. (2016). Form 10-K Annual Report. (Report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.