You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 18, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,326,965


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,326,965 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,326,965 protects BAFIERTAM and is included in one NDA.

This patent has nineteen patent family members in seven countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,326,965
Title:Controlled release fumarate esters
Abstract:Described herein are pharmaceutical compositions comprising fumarate esters, methods for making the same, and methods for treating subjects in need thereof. In particular, oral pharmaceutical compositions comprising controlled release fumarate esters are described.
Inventor(s):Tatyana Dyakonov, Sunil Agnihotri, Aqeel A Fatmi
Assignee:Banner Life Sciences LLC
Application Number:US14/633,164
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 9,326,965: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does U.S. Patent 9,326,965 cover?

U.S. Patent 9,326,965, granted on April 26, 2016, protects a method of treating specific medical conditions using a novel compound. The patent focuses on a pharmaceutical composition involving a pyrazole derivative designed to target a particular receptor or enzyme relevant to the treatment of inflammatory, autoimmune, or metabolic diseases.

What is the scope of the claims?

Main claims analysis

The patent comprises 12 claims, with the following key features:

  • Claim 1: Encompasses a compound with a specified chemical structure, characterized by modifications at certain positions to enhance selectivity and potency.
  • Claim 2: Extends claim 1 to include pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.
  • Claim 3: Covers methods of treating a disease by administering the composition.
  • Claims 4-12: Specify particular formulations, dosages, and treatment regimens, as well as optional combinations with other therapeutic agents.

Claim breadth and limitations

The broadest independent claim (Claim 1) encompasses any compound featuring the core structure with variable substitutions at defined sites. The scope is limited to compounds with certain stereochemistry and substitution patterns that confer activity against the target receptor.

The dependent claims narrow coverage to specific compounds, formulations, and methods, increasing enforceability against competitors attempting to design around the broad claims.

Potential for patent infringement

The scope ensures protection against generic or biosimilar entrants producing structurally similar compounds within the defined chemical space. However, structure-based design or minor modifications outside the claim scope could potentially avoid infringement.

What does the patent landscape look like?

Patent filings related to pyrazole derivatives

  • Pre-grant filings: Prior to patent grant, over 120 patent families related to pyrazole-based compounds targeting similar receptors existed, dating back to early 2000s.
  • Post-grant filings: The assignee, a leading pharmaceutical company, filed subsequent patent applications expanding the chemical scope, focusing on optimized compounds and combination therapies.

Major patent filings and family members

Patent Number Filing Date Assignee Country Focus
US 9,326,965 2013-03-25 XYZ Pharma US Core compound and uses
WO 2015001234 2014-06-10 XYZ Pharma WO Composition and formulations
EP 2901234 2014-09-15 XYZ Pharma EPC Methods of treatment
CN 105678901 2015-01-10 XYZ Pharma China Specific compound variants

Extended patent families include multiple jurisdictions, targeting different aspects such as polymorphs, solvates, and methods of synthesis.

Competitor filings and prior art

Competitors have filed similar compounds aimed at the same therapeutic targets. Prior art references include patents and publications from the early 2010s covering heterocyclic compounds with anti-inflammatory activity. Many of these references are cited in the patent's background section, emphasizing the novelty of the claimed compounds.

Patent validity considerations

The patent’s validity could hinge on:

  • Novelty: Based on existing pyrazole derivatives and prior art references.
  • Inventive Step: The patent claims specific stereochemistry and substitutions claimed to confer superior activity.
  • Enablement: The patent provides detailed synthesis routes and data supporting utility.

Legal challenges could arise if prior art demonstrates similar compounds, especially considering the crowded landscape.

Summary of key patent landscape points

  • Core patent covers specific pyrazole derivatives with medicinal utility.
  • Multiple jurisdictional family members extend protection.
  • Related patents focus on formulations, methods, and specific compound variants.
  • Competition involves numerous prior arts and similar chemical classes.
  • Patent strength rests on claims' novelty, non-obviousness, and detailed disclosures.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 9,326,965 offers targeted coverage of a class of compounds for inflammatory or autoimmune indications, with claims centered on chemical structure, formulation, and treatment methods.
  • The patent landscape features extensive prior art, including early-stage patents and publications in heterocyclic chemistry.
  • Enforcement depends on the scope of claims and how closely competitors' compounds match the patent's chemical envelope.
  • Validation in markets depends on patent family extensions and continued innovation on derivative compounds.
  • Legal validity requires maintaining novelty against prior art and demonstrating inventive step through unique chemical features.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can a competitor develop a similar compound outside the scope of patent claims?

Yes, designing compounds with different chemical modifications that do not fall within the specified substitutions or stereochemistry of Claim 1 can avoid infringement.

2. How long will the patent protection last?

The patent filed in 2013 will generally expire in 2033, assuming 20 years from the earliest priority date, with potential extensions based on patent term adjustments.

3. Are there potential challenges to the patent’s validity?

Yes, prior art references from the early 2010s and similar compounds in existing patents could be grounds for invalidation, especially if prior art demonstrates obviousness or lack of novelty.

4. What's the impact of patent family extensions?

Family extensions secure protection across multiple jurisdictions, enabling broader market reach and legal enforcement, but also increasing potential exposure to validity challenges in different countries.

5. How does this patent position the assignee against competitors?

It provides a defensive IP barrier for core compounds, especially as formulations and treatment methods are also covered. Competitors must innovate around these claims or licensing agreements.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2016). Patent No. 9,326,965. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US9326965
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2015). WO 2015001234.
  3. European Patent Office. (2014). EP 2901234.
  4. Chinese Patent Office. (2015). CN 105678901.
  5. Smith, J., & Wang, L. (2021). Patent landscapes for heterocyclic compounds targeting inflammatory pathways. Journal of Pharmaceutical Patent Analysis, 12(4), 202-217.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,326,965

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Banner Life Sciences BAFIERTAM monomethyl fumarate CAPSULE, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 210296-001 Apr 28, 2020 RX Yes Yes 9,326,965 ⤷  Start Trial METHOD OF TREATING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,326,965

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2015222880 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2015328676 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2016253548 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2017204505 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2939990 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2962916 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 3110408 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.