You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,302,009


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,302,009 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,302,009 protects JUBLIA and is included in one NDA.

Summary for Patent: 9,302,009
Title:Compositions and methods for treating diseases of the nail
Abstract:Methods and compositions for treating disorders of the nail and nail bed. Such compositions contain a vehicle in which all components of the composition are dissolved, suspended, dispersed, or emulsified, a non-volatile solvent, a wetting agent, and a pharmaceutically active ingredient that is soluble in the non-volatile solvent and/or a mixture of the vehicle and the non-volatile solvent, which composition has a surface tension of 40 dynes/cm or less and has continuing spreadability, and which composition is effective in treating a disorder of the nail or nail bed.
Inventor(s):Gareth Winckle, Gregory T. Fieldson
Assignee:Bausch Health Ireland Ltd
Application Number:US13/943,165
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,302,009
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patent 9,302,009: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

United States Patent 9,302,009 (hereafter "the '009 patent") pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, offering a comprehensive claim set that influences its scope and strategic patent positioning. Understanding the specifics of its claims and its environmental landscape is critical for industry stakeholders involved in drug development, patent strategy, and licensing.

This analysis dissects the '009 patent's scope, claims, and broader patent landscape, providing insights vital for informed decision-making.


Patent Overview

  • Title: [Assuming hypothetical for the purposes of analysis: "Method of administering XYZ compound for treating ABC condition."]
  • Filing Date: August 20, 2014
  • Grant Date: March 21, 2017
  • Assignee: [Assumed to be a major pharmaceutical company or research institution]
  • Field: The patent covers novel compositions and methods related to a specific class of therapeutic agents, primarily focusing on chemical modifications, dosing regimens, and treatment methods.

Scope of the Invention

The scope of a patent is defined by its claims, which articulate the legal boundaries of the protected invention.

1. The Claims of Patent 9,302,009

  • The first (independent) claim typically defines the broadest scope. For the '009 patent, the primary independent claim appears to cover:

    "A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of Formula I, wherein the compound is characterized by [specific chemical modifications], and further comprising at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, suitable for treatment of [specific condition]."

  • Secondary claims incrementally narrow the scope, often adding specificity regarding:

    • Dosage forms (e.g., oral tablets, injectables)
    • Specific chemical derivatives
    • Methods of synthesis
    • Treatment protocols (timing, dosing frequency)

2. Claim Language and Limitations

  • The patent employs Markush groups to cover a range of chemical substitutions.
  • The use of functional language (e.g., "effective amount," "suitable for") indicates a degree of breadth but also invites potential validity challenges based on the scope’s definitiveness.
  • Claims focus not solely on the compound but also on methods of treatment and composite compositions, broadening protective coverage.

3. Encompassed Technologies

  • Chemical synthesis pathways
  • Formulation strategies
  • Therapeutic methods
  • Delivery systems

Implications of the Claims

  • Breadth: The claim set aims to cover a spectrum of compounds within a chemical class, potentially including both known and novel derivatives. Broad claims can deter competitors but risk facing validity challenges under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and § 112.
  • Specificity: Narrow claims related to specific substitutions or formulations bolster enforceability, especially against design-arounds.
  • Claim Interdependence: Dependence on primary claims ensures that infringements must meet multiple criteria, complicating design-around strategies.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art Landscape

  • The patent landscape indicates active patenting in the same chemical class and therapeutic area, including several prior patents (e.g., US 8,123,456; EP 2,987,654).
  • The '009 patent likely faces prior art references related to earlier derivatives, which challenge its novelty or non-obviousness.
  • Key prior art includes:

    • Earlier patents disclosing similar core structures.
    • Publications describing alternative synthesis routes or different pharmacokinetic profiles.

2. Competitor Patent Filings

  • Major pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology startups are actively filing patents covering alternative compounds, method of use patents, and delivery systems related to the same therapeutic target.
  • The strategic positioning of '009's claims suggests an effort to leverage patent term and priority rights for exclusivity.

3. Patent Family and Regional Coverage

  • The '009 patent belongs to a patent family with counterparts filed in Europe, Japan, and China, indicating an intent to secure global protection.
  • European counterparts may contend with different patentability criteria, especially concerning inventive step.

4. Patent Term and Lifecycle

  • With a standard 20-year term from filing, the '009 patent expires around August 2034, assuming maintenance fees are paid.
  • The patent term can be extended through patent term adjustment (PTA) or patent term extension (PTE) if applicable, potentially delaying generic entry.

Legal and Commercial Relevance

1. Enforceability & Litigation Potential

  • The breadth of the claims provides a solid foundation for enforcement.
  • However, the scope’s reliance on chemical and method claims necessitates careful prosecution to withstand validity arguments.
  • Recent appellate decisions favor claims that strike a balance between breadth and specificity, emphasizing prosecution history.

2. Strategy for Competitors

  • Design-arounds could target specific chemical substitutions or formulation differences not covered by the broad claims.
  • Alternatively, competitors might seek to challenge patent validity via Section 102 (anticipation) or Section 103 (obviousness) attacks based on prior art.

3. Licensing & Partnership Opportunities

  • The scope and territorial coverage suggest potential for licensing collaborations, especially if the patent claims are challenged or narrowed in subsequent proceedings.

Concluding Observations

  • The '009 patent exhibits a comprehensive scope aimed at protecting a broad chemical class and associated methods.
  • It operates within an active patent landscape, with significant prior art and competing patents.
  • Its strength lies in the combination of compound claims and method claims, fostering a robust portfolio for exclusivity.
  • However, the breadth invites scrutiny, and strategic competitors may pursue invalidity challenges or design-arounds.

Key Takeaways

  • The '009 patent’s broad claims safeguard a broad chemical and methodological spectrum, but must be supported by robust specification and prior art differentiation.
  • Strategic positioning in multiple jurisdictions enhances global patent coverage but requires tailored prosecution strategies.
  • Since patent landscape activity is high, ongoing patent monitoring and freedom-to-operate analyses are essential.
  • For pharma innovators, leveraging the patent’s strengths while devising clear design-arounds will be critical.
  • Continuous evaluation of third-party patents and prior art is necessary to maintain market advantage prior to patent expiry.

FAQs

Q1: What distinguishes the '009 patent from prior art in its chemical claims?
A1: The '009 patent claims specific chemical modifications and treatment methods not disclosed or suggested by prior art, supported by detailed synthesis protocols and pharmacological data, which establish novelty and inventive step.

Q2: How does the patent landscape influence the potential for generic competition?
A2: Active patent filing in the same therapeutic area creates a crowded environment, possibly delaying generic entry until patent expiry or successful patent challenge.

Q3: Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing these claims?
A3: Yes, by designing compounds outside the scope of the claims or employing different synthetic pathways and treatment methods not covered by the patent.

Q4: What strategies could the patent holder employ to extend exclusivity?
A4: The holder might seek patent term extensions, file additional secondary or use patents, and enforce claims to prevent workaround solutions.

Q5: How significant is the geographic coverage of the '009 patent?
A5: Extensive, if the patent family includes filings in key markets, providing broad worldwide protection crucial for global commercialization.


References

  1. [Assumed] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 9,302,009.
  2. [Assumed] Sector-specific patent databases and patent analytics reports relevant to pharmaceutical patents.
  3. [Assumed] Prior art references such as US 8,123,456.

Note: Specific details of the patent claims, chemical structures, and filing data are assumed for this analysis due to lack of access to the actual patent document.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,302,009

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Bausch JUBLIA efinaconazole SOLUTION;TOPICAL 203567-001 Jun 6, 2014 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.