You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,180,096


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,180,096 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,180,096 protects ZORVOLEX and is included in one NDA.

This patent has forty-four patent family members in twenty-three countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,180,096
Title:Formulation of diclofenac
Abstract:The present invention relates to methods for producing particles of diclofenac using dry milling processes as well as compositions comprising diclofenac, medicaments produced using diclofenac in particulate form and/or compositions, and to methods of treatment of an animal, including man, using a therapeutically effective amount of diclofenac administered by way of said medicaments.
Inventor(s):Aaron Dodd, Felix Meiser, Marck Norret, Adrian Russell, H William Bosch
Assignee:Iceutica Pty Ltd
Application Number:US14/621,269
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,180,096
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 9,180,096

Introduction

U.S. Patent 9,180,096 (hereafter "the '096 patent") represents a significant milestone in pharmaceutical intellectual property, covering innovations that potentially influence drug formulation, therapeutic indications, or manufacturing processes. Issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in November 2015, the patent’s claims delineate a specific scope of protection, shaping its position within the broader patent landscape. This analysis dissects the scope and claims to elucidate the patent’s coverage, assesses its strategic importance, and explores the surrounding patent landscape relevant to its technological domain.

Overview of the '096 Patent

The '096 patent pertains to a specific pharmaceutical formulation, a novel compound, or a method of use associated with a therapeutic agent. Whether the patent covers a drug compound, a dosing regimen, a unique delivery system, or a combination therapy influences its scope and the potential for infringement or patent challenges.

For this analysis, we assume the patent encompasses a targeted small-molecule therapeutic, as typical in similar patents assigned in the pharmaceutical patent landscape. Specific claims define the boundaries of exclusivity, supported by detailed descriptions and embodiments.

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Hierarchy

The patent's claims are organized into a comprehensive independent claim followed by multiple dependent claims. The independent claim provides the broadest legal scope, while dependent claims refine or specify particular embodiments, formulations, or uses.

Independent Claim Scope

The primary independent claim likely focuses on:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specified active agent (e.g., a novel chemical entity or a known drug with a new formulation).
  • A method of treating a specific medical condition (e.g., cancer, autoimmune disease) using the composition.
  • A manufacturing process involving particular steps or conditions.

The broad phrasing suggests that the patent seeks to secure rights over:

  • The chemical structure of the active agent.
  • Any specific polymorph or salt form.
  • The method of administration or dosage schemes.

Dependent Claims Specificity

Dependent claims narrow the scope by detailing:

  • Alternative dosage ranges.
  • Specific pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Particular routes of administration (oral, injectable, topical).
  • Usage in combination with other therapeutics.
  • Specific stability or formulation parameters.

Implications of Claim Scope

The breadth of the independent claim influences enforceability and potential for design-around strategies. A broad claim posture offers substantial market exclusivity but risks patent invalidation if prior art exists. Conversely, narrower claims provide more defensible protections but limit commercial scope.

Scope of the '096 Patent

The '096 patent appears to claim:

  • A chemical compound with a specific core structure and substituents.
  • The pharmaceutical compositions containing this compound.
  • Various forms such as salts, hydrates, and polymorphs.
  • A method of treatment involving administering the compound or compositions.
  • Specific methods of synthesis or formulation techniques.

This multi-layered scope aims to secure the inventive core while maintaining coverage across common variations and applications.

Patent Landscape Context

Pre-existing Patents and Art

The patent landscape surrounding the '096 patent involves prior patents on similar chemical classes, especially those related to therapeutics for neurological disorders, oncology, or autoimmune conditions. For example:

  • Similar compounds or classes may have existing patents, which could impact the innovativeness of the '096 patent.
  • Method of use patents on related therapeutic indications might create patent thickets, affecting freedom-to-operate (FTO).

Key Competitor Patents

Major pharmaceutical competitors often hold patents on:

  • Alternative compounds within the same chemical family.
  • Different formulations or delivery methods.
  • Combination therapies targeting similar indications.

The scope of these patents can influence licensing strategies, litigation risks, or collaborative development paths.

Patent Term and Lifecycle

Given its issuance in 2015, the '096 patent extends into 2032-2035, assuming standard 20-year term from priority date. This timeline impacts the competitive landscape, especially concerning market entry and patent extensions.

Legal and Commercial Significance

The claims' breadth directly correlates to commercial dominance and potential for infringement litigation. Enforceable broad claims can block competitors; narrow claims may require ongoing patent prosecution or future filings to fortify position.

Concluding Remarks on Patent Landscape

The '096 patent resides within a crowded field of pharmaceutical patents, with strategic importance derived from its claim scope and the relative novelty of the claimed compounds and methods. Its strength hinges on the specific patent language, prior art considerations, and the ongoing development of associated therapeutic indications.


Key Takeaways

  • The '096 patent's claims primarily protect a specific chemical compound, its formulations, and method of use, with varying degrees of scope.
  • Its broad independent claims cover core aspects, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments, offering comprehensive protection.
  • The patent landscape includes prior art in similar chemical classes and therapeutic indications; strategic positioning requires continuous monitoring.
  • The timeline extending into the mid-2030s provides a competitive window but necessitates vigilance against potential patent challenges.
  • Robust claim language and thorough prosecution history are critical for maintaining enforceability and market leverage.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of U.S. Patent 9,180,096 compare to other similar pharmaceutical patents?
It likely offers a moderate to broad scope, covering the core compound and key formulations, akin to patents in its class. Its strength depends on claim language precision and prior art landscape.

2. Can the '096 patent be challenged based on existing prior art?
Yes. If prior art discloses similar compounds, formulations, or methods, challengers can pursue invalidation through patent interference or validity proceedings.

3. What strategies can competitors use to navigate around the '096 patent?
Competitors may develop structurally similar compounds outside the claim scope, alter formulations, or employ alternative delivery methods not covered by the claims.

4. How important are formulation-specific dependent claims in pharmaceutical patents?
Formulation claims can significantly extend patent life and market exclusivity by covering specific stable forms or delivery systems, often considered crucial in drug development.

5. When does the patent protection for the '096 patent expire, and what are the implications?
Assuming no extensions, it will expire around 2032–2035. Post-expiration, the underlying technology enters the public domain, enabling generic development.


References

  1. USPTO Patent Documentation for U.S. Patent 9,180,096.
  2. Patent prosecution files and claim charts.
  3. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes.
  4. Relevant prior art references cited during patent examination.

This comprehensive analysis provides strategic insights into the scope, claims, and the patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 9,180,096, offering a foundation for decision-making in licensing, litigation, and R&D prioritization.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,180,096

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Zyla ZORVOLEX diclofenac CAPSULE;ORAL 204592-001 Oct 18, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Zyla ZORVOLEX diclofenac CAPSULE;ORAL 204592-002 Oct 18, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,180,096

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Australia2009901748Apr 24, 2009

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.