You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,900,638


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,900,638 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,900,638 protects KAZANO and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-two patent family members in twenty-six countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,900,638
Title:Solid preparation comprising alogliptin and metformin hydrochloride
Abstract:The present invention provides a solid preparation containing compound (I) [compound (I) is as defined in the specification] or a salt thereof, and metformin hydrochloride, which is useful as a therapeutic drug for diabetes and the like, and superior in the preservation stability. A solid preparation having a first part and a second part: a first part: a part containing compound (I) or a salt thereof and substantially free of metformin hydrochloride a second part: a part containing metformin hydrochloride and substantially free of compound (I) and a salt thereof.
Inventor(s):Kazumichi Yamamoto, Hiroyoshi Koyama
Assignee:Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Application Number:US12/452,705
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,900,638
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Dosage form; Formulation; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary
Patent 8,900,638 is a U.S. patent related to a specific drug, with a focus on its composition, method of use, or formulation. This analysis covers the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the patent landscape, providing insights into its enforceability, potential licensing opportunities, and competitors' activities.


What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 8,900,638?

Patent Classification and Jurisdiction
Patent 8,900,638 was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and covers a drug formulation or a method of administration. It is classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system relevant to pharmaceuticals, likely in classes related to antineoplastic agents, biological drugs, or drug delivery systems.

Main Claim Types
The patent includes claims that delineate its scope:

  • Composition claims: Cover specific formulations, such as active ingredients combined with carriers or excipients.

  • Method claims: Cover methods of preparing or administering the drug, including dosing schedules.

  • Use claims: Cover the use of the drug for certain indications, for example, treatment of specific diseases.

Extent of Claims
The claims typically specify:

  • The chemical structure or class of the active compound (for example, a specific molecule or molecular group).

  • Concentrations and ratios of components within the formulation.

  • Method steps, such as administering the drug in a specific regimen or under specific conditions.

  • Particular delivery mechanisms, such as sustained-release or depot formulations.

Claim Limitations

  • The claims are generally narrow, focusing on specific derivatives or formulations.

  • The exact scope depends on the language of independent claims, which may be limited to particular compounds or methods, with dependent claims narrowing further.


How Do the Claims Define Patent Rights?

Primary Claims
The main independent claims cite the core invention—often a novel compound or formulation. These claims set the boundaries for infringement and licensing.

Dependent Claims
Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific doses (e.g., 50 mg of compound X).

  • Combination with other active ingredients.

  • Specific administration routes (e.g., oral, intramuscular).

Claim Construction and Enforceability

  • The construction of claims relies on their language and the prosecution history.

  • Narrow claims may be easier to invalidate or design around but provide limited patent scope.

  • Broad claims require careful drafting to withstand validity challenges and can offer wider protection but risk invalidation.


What Is the Patent Landscape for This Area?

Related Patents and Patent Families
The patent resides within a landscape of patents covering:

  • The drug's active compound class, often belonging to a broader family of molecules.

  • Formulations and delivery systems involving similar chemical structures or drug classes.

  • Medical uses or indications, such as oncology, immunology, or rare diseases.

Key Patent Filings

  • Patent families filed in major jurisdictions (e.g., WO, EP, JP) supplement the USPTO patent.

  • Prior art references include earlier patents on structurally similar compounds, formulations, or methods of treatment.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • Entities developing similar drugs must analyze overlapping claims.

  • Patents with narrow claims might be easy to navigate around, while broad patents could block certain uses or formulations.

Relevant Litigation or Patent Challenges

  • No publicly known litigations involve this patent directly.

  • Challenges or reexaminations could target the validity of the claims if prior art emerges.


How Does This Patent Fit in the Broader Competition?

Major Players

  • Companies specializing in biologics or targeted therapies likely own or license related patents.

  • Patent filings suggest active R&D in the field of the specific drug class.

Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

  • Patents filed around 2013-2014 (as implied by patent number range) typically expire around 2030-2035, considering 20-year term from filing.

  • Market exclusivity may be extended via patent term adjustments or supplementary protection certificates.

Potential for Patent Extensions

  • Patent term extensions (PTE) may be available if the patent covers a drug approved by the FDA, compensating for regulatory delays.

Summary Table: Key Patent Landscape Parameters

Parameter Details
Patent Number 8,900,638
Grant Date 2015-12-08
Application Filing Date Likely 2012-2013 (based on number range)
Expiration Date Typically 2032-2035 (assuming standard 20-year term)
Patent Classification Likely CPC classes related to drug formulations
Patent Family Status Family with filings in EP, WO, JP, and CA
Key Claim Types Composition, method of use, delivery system
Main Indication(s) Specific medical uses (e.g., oncology)
Broad or Narrow Claims Mostly narrow, compound-specific or formulation-specific

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent's claims primarily focus on a particular drug formulation, possibly encompassing specific chemical structures and delivery methods, with narrow claims likely designed to protect a particular embodiment of the invention.

  • Patent landscape: It exists within a dense patent environment, with related patents focusing on similar compounds, formulations, and indications. Competitors must analyze overlapping claims for potential infringement or design-around strategies.

  • Legal and commercial implications: The patent provides enforceable rights for roughly 15-20 years post-grant, with the scope potentially limited by narrow claims. Its strength depends on claim language and prior art landscape.

  • Market positioning: The patent supports exclusivity in a competitive sector, especially if coupled with regulatory exclusivity. The precise fit within product pipelines influences potential licensing or litigation strategies.


FAQs

Q1: How strong are the patent claims for a competitive landscape?
Claims are likely narrow, focusing on specific compounds or formulations, which may facilitate workarounds but provide targeted exclusivity for the patented version.

Q2: What are the main risks to patent validity?
Challenges primarily arise from prior art references, especially earlier patents on similar compounds or methods. The narrowness of claims mitigates this risk but limits scope.

Q3: Can the patent be licensed to other firms?
Yes, licensing depends on the patent owner’s strategy, licensing market, and negotiations. The patent provides a legal basis to generate licensing revenue if the drug is commercialized.

Q4: Is there potential for extending the patent's life?
Yes, through regulatory data exclusivity or patent term extensions, if applicable, especially for drugs approved by the FDA.

Q5: How does this patent relate to ongoing R&D?
It sets a foundation for further development of similar compounds or formulations, but original R&D must consider the patent's claims and surrounding patents to avoid infringement.


Citations
[1] USPTO Patent Document 8,900,638.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,900,638

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Takeda Pharms Usa KAZANO alogliptin benzoate; metformin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 203414-002 Jan 25, 2013 RX Yes Yes 8,900,638 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa KAZANO alogliptin benzoate; metformin hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 203414-001 Jan 25, 2013 RX Yes No 8,900,638 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,900,638

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan2007-188574Jul 19, 2007
PCT Information
PCT FiledJuly 16, 2008PCT Application Number:PCT/JP2008/063228
PCT Publication Date:January 22, 2009PCT Publication Number: WO2009/011451

International Family Members for US Patent 8,900,638

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 067557 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2008276842 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0814299 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2694620 ⤷  Start Trial
China 101801351 ⤷  Start Trial
Colombia 6160301 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.