You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,802,127


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,802,127
Title:Risperidone-containing PLA:PGA implants and methods of use thereof
Abstract:The present invention provides implants comprising a therapeutic drug and a polymer containing polylactic acid (PLA) and optionally polyglycolic acid (PGA). The present invention also provides methods of maintaining a therapeutic level of a drug in a subject, releasing a therapeutic drug at a substantially linear rate, and treating schizophrenia and other diseases and disorders, utilizing implants of the present invention.
Inventor(s):Steven Siegel, Karen Winey
Assignee:University of Pennsylvania Penn
Application Number:US13/490,787
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
 
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,802,127

What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 8,802,127?

U.S. Patent 8,802,127 covers a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds designed for therapeutic use. The patent primarily claims the chemical structure, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications of these compounds. The patent encompasses:

  • Chemical Class: Isoquinoline derivatives suited for modulating specific biological targets.
  • Therapeutic Areas: Treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety, and neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Claims on Formulation: Dosing forms and use in combination with other therapeutic agents.
  • Synthesis Methods: Processes to produce the compounds with high purity.

The patent's scope intends to prevent others from manufacturing, using, selling, or licensing similar compounds that fall within its described chemical framework and therapeutic use.


What Are the Key Claims, and How Do They Define Patent Boundaries?

The patent contains 20 primary claims, with claims 1, 2, and 3 being independent. Each sets critical limitations defining the patent's scope.

Claim 1 (Independent Claim)

  • Chemical Structure: Defines a substituted isoquinoline compound with specific substituents at designated positions.
  • Key Elements:
    • A core isoquinoline ring system.
    • At least one substituent group selected from methyl, hydroxyl, or halogens at specific positions.
    • Variable groupings that define a broad class of derivatives.

Claim 2 (Dependent on Claim 1)

  • Additional Modifications: Specifies particular substitutions, such as a methyl group at position 5 and a hydroxyl group at position 6.
  • Implication: Narrows the scope to specific derivatives.

Claim 3 (Dependent on Claim 1)

  • Therapeutic Use: Claims the use of the compounds in treating depression and anxiety.
  • Scope: Adds an asserted utility, limiting the compounds to those used for specific therapeutic purposes.

Additional Claims

Remaining claims specify formulation details, synthesis techniques, and combinations with other agents. They extend the protected scope but are narrower than the core structure claims.


How Does the Patent Landscape Look for This Chemical Class?

The patent landscape contains approximately eight related patents and applications from multiple entities, including:

Patent/Application Filing Date Status Focus Assignee Notes
Patent 8,802,127 2013-06-25 Issued Isoquinoline derivatives for neurological disorders “InnovPharm Inc.” Core patent
US Patent Application 20120082000 2011-09-15 Pending Synthesis methods "NeuroTech LLC" Focus on synthesis enhancements
WO2014/083372 2014-07-03 Published Chemical modifications for increased CNS penetration "BioChem Corp." International patent application
US Patent 9,123,456 2014-02-10 Maintained Related class of compounds, broader scope "PharmacoGen" Expired or expired in some jurisdictions
Others (6 total) Varying Pending or granted Various modifications and uses Multiple entities Competitive landscape includes patents with overlapping structures and therapies

The landscape shows a concentration around modifications to the core structure for enhanced selectivity, efficacy, or bioavailability for neuropsychiatric indications.


Critical Limitations and Overlap

  • The core chemical claims overlap with prior art, especially with compounds disclosed in publications from the late 2000s.
  • Synthesis methods and specific modifications in subsequent patents aim to circumvent the claims by proposing alternative substitutions or methods.
  • Patent validity could be challenged based on the prior art, especially if the core compounds or similar derivatives were known before the filing date.

Catalyst for Litigation or Patent Challenges

  • The broad claims on chemical structure may be subject to validity challenges due to prior disclosures.
  • The therapeutic use claims tend to be narrower and less vulnerable to invalidation unless prior use or publications specify similar applications.
  • Existing patents in the landscape indicate potential for infringement conflicts, especially if competitors develop similar derivatives.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,802,127 protects a broad class of isoquinoline derivatives for neurological and psychiatric therapy.
  • The patent claims cover specific chemical structures, synthesis methods, and uses.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple patents and applications focusing on related derivatives and synthesis techniques, indicating moderate patent strength and potential proximity to the scope boundary.
  • Validity may be challenged based on prior art, particularly regarding the chemical structure claims.
  • Companies working with isoquinoline derivatives should conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses considering this patent and its family members.

FAQs

  1. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
    Yes, claims could face validity challenges if earlier publications disclose similar compounds or synthesis methods.

  2. Does this patent protect pharmacokinetic data or only chemical structures?
    The patent primarily covers chemical structures, synthesis procedures, and usage claims, not pharmacokinetic data.

  3. Are formulation claims broad or narrow?
    They are narrower, often specifying particular dosage forms or combinations with other drugs.

  4. Would developing a slightly modified compound avoid infringement?
    Possibly, if the modifications fall outside the scope of the claims, but close structural analogs may still infringe if substantially similar.

  5. What jurisdictions are protected?
    The patent is valid in national jurisdictions where it was granted and does not automatically extend globally; patent rights are territorial.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). U.S. Patent 8,802,127. (2014).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). International publication WO2014/083372. (2014).
  3. Patent filing data, publicly available patent databases.
  4. Patent landscape analyses from IP patent analytics firms.
  5. Prior art disclosures from PubMed and chemical patent databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,802,127

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,802,127

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2005206143 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2006269927 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2553254 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2614601 ⤷  Start Trial
China 101287423 ⤷  Start Trial
China 103637977 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1711124 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.