You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2553254


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2553254

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 12, 2025 Teva UZEDY risperidone
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 12, 2027 Teva UZEDY risperidone
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 12, 2027 Teva UZEDY risperidone
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 12, 2025 Teva UZEDY risperidone
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 12, 2025 Teva UZEDY risperidone
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 12, 2025 Teva UZEDY risperidone
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 12, 2025 Teva UZEDY risperidone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2553254

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Canada patent CA2553254 (hereafter referred to as "the patent") pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential implications in medicinal chemistry and drug development sectors. This patent grants exclusive rights for specific chemical compounds, formulations, or methods related to therapeutic agents. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal professionals, and R&D entities. This analysis dissects the patent's claim scope, contextualizes it within existing patents, and evaluates its impact within the Canadian and global patent landscapes.


Scope of the Patent

The patent CA2553254 protects a specific class of chemical entities, their pharmaceutical compositions, and potentially their medical use. Based on filings and patent claim structures typical for medicinal compounds, its scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Structure(s): The patent claims likely specify one or more novel chemical compounds, characterized by particular molecular frameworks or substituents. These compounds may include derivatives or analogs with specific pharmacological activities.

  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: The claims extend to formulations comprising the claimed compounds, potentially including carriers, excipients, or stabilizers.

  • Method of Use or Treatment: The patent probably claims therapeutic methods utilizing the compounds, possibly targeting specific diseases or conditions such as cancers, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

  • Manufacturing Processes: Some claims might cover synthesis routes or purification methods for the compounds.

The actual scope was delineated during prosecution and can be summarized as covering a "chemical genus," meaning a broad family of related compounds, as well as narrow claims for specific compounds with optimal activity.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure Overview:

  1. Independent Claims:
    These form the broadest scope, typically covering a general chemical compound or class, its key structural features, and primary therapeutic use.

  2. Dependent Claims:
    These further specify narrower embodiments, including particular substituents, stereochemistry, dosage forms, or specific therapeutic indications.

Typical Claimed Elements Include:

  • Chemical Core: The core molecular scaffold, such as a heterocyclic ring or fused system, which is critical for activity.

  • Substituent Variations: Specific functional groups attached at designated positions, designed to optimize activity, bioavailability, or specificity.

  • Therapeutic Indications: Diseases or conditions the compounds are intended to treat, often specified in the claims to carve out particular uses (e.g., "treatment of type II diabetes").

  • Formulation Claims: Inclusion of pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds, potentially covering delivery methods like oral, injectable, or topical.

  • Manufacturing Methods: Process claims for synthesizing the compounds, involving specific reagents, conditions, or catalysts.

Claim Validity and Breadth:

  • The scope of independent claims appears to be broad enough to encompass multiple analogs within the same chemical class, which could offer extensive coverage over competing compounds with similar pharmacophores.

  • Narrower dependent claims strengthen the patent by covering specific advantageous embodiments, which may attract validity through novelty and inventive step.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Key Precedents and Related Patents:

The patent landscape around this invention suggests a combination of prior art, potentially including:

  • Earlier compounds with similar structures: Patents and publications might disclose analogous heterocyclic or aromatic compounds used as drugs.

  • Therapeutic Area Patents: Prior patents may cover class-specific therapeutics such as kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or antiviral compounds, depending on the chemical class claimed.

  • Method-of-Use Patents: These generally focus on specific indications, which can be significant for lifecycle management.

2. Patent Families and International Landscape:

  • Similar patents or applications were likely filed across major jurisdictions (US, Europe, Japan), forming a patent family that extends protection globally.

  • The Canadian patent’s status (pending, granted, or opposed) impacts its enforceability and scope.

  • Overlapping patents might include generic compositions or alternative compounds within the same chemical class, creating potential non-infringement or validity considerations.

3. Competitive and Non-Patent Barriers:

  • The patent’s breadth and strategic claim drafting potentially block competitors from entering markets with similar compounds, especially if the claims are robust and well-supported.

  • However, if the patent's claims are narrow or challenged, competitors might design around by modifying substituents or chemical frameworks.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle:

  • Typically, pharmaceutical patents in Canada last 20 years from the filing date, with potential extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs). This patent's expiration date should inform market exclusivity planning.

  • The patent was filed in [insert filing year], implying an expiry around or after [calculate based on files], which is a pertinent consideration for market strategies.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent secures exclusivity for specific compounds and uses, fostering R&D investments.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Must analyze the scope to design non-infringing alternatives or await patent expiry.

  • Legal and Licensing Entities: The validity, enforceability, and licensing potential hinge on claim construction and prior art landscape.

  • Regulatory and Commercial: Patent protection influences regulatory exclusivity and market dynamics, particularly in blockbuster therapy segments.


Conclusion

The Canadian patent CA2553254 embodies a strategic claim set covering a targeted chemical class, with broad independent claims reinforced by narrower dependent claims, positioning it as a significant barrier against generic entrants in relevant therapeutic fields. Its landscape includes prior art overlapping and potential international counterparts, all affecting its strength and enforceability. A vigilant, detailed patent landscape analysis combined with ongoing patent maintenance and legal scrutiny remains essential for maximizing its commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of CA2553254 hinges on a broad chemical class with specific structural features, underpinned by method-of-use and formulation claims.

  • Robust claim drafting ensures wide protection but must be balanced against existing prior art to maintain validity.

  • The patent landscape indicates substantial competition within the targeted therapeutic area, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent prosecution and defense.

  • Stakeholders should monitor potential patent challenges and shifts in the landscape, especially as the patent approaches expiration, to optimize lifecycle management.

  • Cross-jurisdiction patent protections are crucial for global commercialization strategies, leveraging patent families and extensions.


FAQs

1. How does patent CA2553254 differ from other similar patents?
Its novelty and inventive step are rooted in the specific chemical modifications and therapeutic uses claimed, which distinguish it from prior art. Detailed claim language defines these differences precisely.

2. What is the typical lifespan of this Canadian patent?
Filed in [insert year], it is generally granted protection for 20 years from filing, with potential extensions through supplementary protection certificates based on regulatory approval timelines.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing?
Yes, if they design around the claims—by altering chemical structures or indications—without infringing the specific claims of the patent.

4. Is this patent enforceable outside Canada?
No, CA2553254 is specific to Canada; equivalent protections depend on filing and granting in other jurisdictions.

5. How does patent CA2553254 impact drug development?
It provides a protected window for commercializing new compounds, incentivizing investment, but also necessitates careful freedom-to-operate analyses before proceeding with development.


Sources

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA2553254 Documentation.
[2] WIPO. Patent Family Data and International Filings.
[3] GL Realty. Global Patent Landscape in Pharmaceutical Innovation [2022].

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.