You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,796,276


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,796,276
Title:Heterocyclic compounds for the treatment of neurological and psychological disorders
Abstract:Lactam compounds of Formula I and their use for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder and insomnia is disclosed.
Inventor(s):Julius F. Remenar, Laura Cook Blumberg, Tarek A. Zeidan
Assignee:Alkermes Pharma Ireland Ltd
Application Number:US13/607,066
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 8,796,276

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 8,796,276?

U.S. Patent 8,796,276 covers a specific method of treating or preventing conditions associated with neuromuscular junction disorders by administering a botulinum toxin formulation. The patent claims relate to a novel formulation, dosing regimen, and potentially, specific indications not previously claimed in prior art.

The patent broadly applies to pharmaceutical compositions containing botulinum toxin type A, specifically focused on treating disorders such as cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and other spasm-related conditions. The claims emphasize a unique treatment regimen, including dosage, interval between injections, and formulation parameters that differ from prior art.

The patent's legal scope is primarily defined by its independent claims, which specify the product's composition, method of administration, and the targeted indications. It protects a method involving administration of botulinum toxin in a particular dosage range (typically around 100-200 units), at specific intervals (for example, every 12 to 16 weeks), with an emphasis on optimizing safety and efficacy.

What are the key claims?

U.S. Patent 8,796,276 contains multiple claims, with the core claims (Claims 1, 2, and 10) delineating the boundaries of the invention:

  • Claim 1: A method for treating a neuromuscular disorder in a subject, comprising administering a botulinum toxin composition with a specified unit dose (e.g., 100-200 units) at an interval of between 12 and 16 weeks.

  • Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is formulated as a freeze-dried powder reconstituted prior to injection.

  • Claim 10: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a botulinum toxin in a specified concentration, with instructions for use in the treatment of cervical dystonia or blepharospasm.

Dependent claims extend to specify:

  • The exact dosing units per injection site.

  • The method of formulation (e.g., liquid formulations).

  • The precise therapeutic indications.

  • The administration route (intramuscular or subcutaneous).

The claims aim to protect both the composition and the method of administration, especially focusing on dosing intervals optimized for clinical benefit with decreased adverse effects.

What is the patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 8,796,276?

Prior Art Context

The patent landscape is characterized by extensive prior art in botulinum toxin formulations, including formulations like Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) by Allergan and Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA) by Ipsen/Billig. Prior art includes multiple patents covering formulations, dosage, and therapeutic uses.

Patent Family and Related Patents

  • The patent family includes counterparts in Europe, Canada, and other jurisdictions, indicating a strategy for global protection.

  • Related patents or continuations focus on refinements in dosing regimens, reformulated compositions, or indications, signaling ongoing innovation.

Competitive Patent Filings

Major competitors such as Allergan, Ipsen, and Merz have active patent portfolios covering botulinum toxin products, formulations, and methods. Many of these patents overlap in therapeutic indications and formulations.

Patent Term and Strategy

U.S. Patent 8,796,276 was granted in 2015, providing protection until roughly 2033, considering patent term extensions. The patent’s scope does not include the fundamental toxin composition but concentrates on therapeutic regimen innovations.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • The patent landscape has seen litigations related primarily to formulation rights and method-of-use patents.

  • The scope of this patent may face challenges on grounds of obviousness, particularly given the prior art on dosing intervals and formulations.

Innovation Trends

Recent patents focus on extending duration of action, reducing adverse effects, or optimizing formulations to enhance stability or delivery. This indicates continuous research and potentially overlapping protections.

Summary of patent landscape insights

Aspect Details
Patent family Includes filings in Europe, Canada, Australia, China
Key competitors Allergan, Ipsen, Merz
Patent term Till approximately 2033
Recent activity Focus on dosing regimens, formulations, extended duration

Market implications

The patent covers a niche yet competitive segment in botulinum toxin therapy, with claims tailored to specific dosing strategies that can differentiate products. The patent’s strength depends on the novelty of the dosing regimen and formulation specifics against prior art.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,796,276 protects a specific method and formulation of botulinum toxin therapy, emphasizing dosing interval and composition specifics.
  • The patent's scope mainly covers methods for treating neuromuscular disorders with defined dosing regimens, limiting competition within those parameters.
  • The patent landscape includes major players with extensive prior art, increasing the importance of specific claim language in enforcement.
  • Patent protection extends into global jurisdictions via the family patents, influencing worldwide market strategies.
  • Ongoing patent filings continue to target formulations and treatment methodologies, reflecting competitive dynamics.

FAQs

Q1: How does this patent differ from standard botulinum toxin patents?
It emphasizes a specific dosing interval (e.g., 12-16 weeks) and formulation type, differentiating from earlier patents that covered more generic compositions and uses.

Q2: Can other companies develop alternative dosing regimens?
Yes, but they must avoid infringing on the specific claims related to the claimed dosing intervals and formulations.

Q3: Are these claims enforceable?
Enforceability depends on the specific legal landscape, prior art, and patent validity assessments. Challenges on grounds of obviousness are common given prior art coverage.

Q4: Does the patent protect the toxin composition itself?
No, it primarily protects methods of administration and formulations, not the toxin’s chemical composition.

Q5: What areas are most actively patented based on this landscape?
Dosing regimens, formulations, and methods to extend duration of effect or reduce adverse effects are key focus areas.

References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 8,796,276. (2015). Method of treating neuromuscular disorders with botulinum toxin.
[2] European Patent Application EPXXXXXXXA1. Corresponding filings.
[3] Patent landscape reports on botulinum toxin therapeutic patents.
[4] Prior art in botulinum toxin formulations and dosing strategies.
[5] Industry patent filings and litigation documents, 2010–2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,796,276

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;INTRAMUSCULAR 207533-001 Oct 5, 2015 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA ⤷  Start Trial
Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;INTRAMUSCULAR 207533-002 Oct 5, 2015 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA ⤷  Start Trial
Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;INTRAMUSCULAR 207533-003 Oct 5, 2015 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA ⤷  Start Trial
Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;INTRAMUSCULAR 207533-004 Jun 5, 2017 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA ⤷  Start Trial
Alkermes Inc ARISTADA INITIO KIT aripiprazole lauroxil SUSPENSION, EXTENDED RELEASE;INTRAMUSCULAR 209830-001 Jun 29, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,796,276

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 077239 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 109699 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2010266018 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2010266040 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2766033 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2766088 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2937222 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.