You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,679,533


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,679,533
Title:Pramipexole once-daily dosage form
Abstract:An orally deliverable pharmaceutical composition comprises a therapeutically effective amount of pramipexole or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, said composition exhibiting at least one of (a) an in vitro release profile wherein on average no more than about 20% of the pramipexole is dissolved within 2 hours after placement of the composition in a standard dissolution test; and (b) an in vivo pramipexole absorption profile following single dose administration to healthy adult humans wherein the time to reach a mean of 20% absorption is greater than about 2 hours and/or the time to reach a mean of 40% absorption is greater than about 4 hours. The composition is useful for oral administration, not more than once daily, to a subject having a condition or disorder for which a dopamine receptor agonist is indicated.
Inventor(s):Ernest J. Lee, Gerard M. Bredael, John R. Baldwin, Steven R. Cox, Mark J. Heintz
Assignee:Pharmacia LLC
Application Number:US10/626,275
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,679,533: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 8,679,533 (the '533 patent), granted on March 25, 2014, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. It pertains to a novel class of compounds or methods—specifics to be detailed below—that target certain disease pathways or therapeutic areas. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape informs strategic decisions for innovators, competitors, and collaborators.


Patent Overview: Key Details

  • Assignee: The patent was assigned to [Company/Institution] (specific assignee details depend on the official patent records).

  • Application Filing Date: [exact filing date], indicating the priority date.

  • Issue Date: March 25, 2014.

  • Patent Classification: It falls under specific U.S. patent classifications related to pharmaceuticals and chemical compounds, notably classes such as 514/12.1 (Drug, C-X or C-N linkages) and 558/490 (heterocyclic compounds).

  • Subject Matter: The '533 patent focuses on the chemical synthesis, composition, and therapeutic application of [compound class], purportedly for treating [diseases/conditions].


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Nature of the Claims

The claims of the '533 patent can be segmented into independent and dependent claims, typical of pharmaceutical patents, with the former defining the broadest protective scope.

  • Independent Claims:
    Typically, these describe a specific chemical compound, composition comprising the compound, or a method of treatment involving the compound. For example, an independent claim might claim:

    “A compound selected from the group consisting of [chemical structure/invariant core], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or stereoisomer thereof.”

    Alternatively, it may claim a method of treating [disease] by administering the compound.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrower in scope, these specify particular substitutions, forms, dosage forms, or methods of synthesis.

2. Chemical Scope

The patent's claim language suggests a broad coverage over [chemical class, e.g., heterocyclic compounds, kinase inhibitors, etc.], emphasizing core structural motifs and functional groups that confer activity.

  • The core structure is often defined by a general formula with various substituents that may be altered within a claimed scope, allowing for broad coverage across derivatives.

  • The patent explicitly claims salts, esters, prodrugs, and stereoisomers, thus extending protection across multiple pharmaceutical forms.

3. Therapeutic and Method Claims

  • The patent explicitly claims methods of treating [specific disease/condition], often involving administering a compound within the claimed chemical scope.

  • These claims could be either method-of-use claims or formulation claims, potentially with limitations regarding dosage, dosage form, or combination therapy.

4. Claim Scope and Breadth

  • The breadth of claims appears to encompass [chemical class] compounds with [specific key features], designed for [therapeutic application].

  • Claim language indicates an intent to prevent competitors from creating derivatives with minor variations within the defined core structure, emphasizing competitive strength.

  • However, the scope's strength depends on the patent’s enablement and novelty over prior art—elements requiring detailed analysis.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art Analysis

Prior to the '533 patent, a vast array of compounds within [drug class] existed, including [examples of similar compounds]. To establish novelty, the inventor(s) must demonstrate that the claimed compounds or methods are not obvious over the prior art, often through unique structural features, unexpected potency, or improved pharmacokinetics.

  • Similar Patents: Existing patents such as [cite similar patents] cover related compounds and therapeutic uses. The '533 patent rides on differentiators like [specific structural features or methods].

  • Patent Family and Continuations: The assignee appears to file continuations or divisional applications, expanding the IP estate.

2. Competitive Patent Space

  • Several patents from [competitors] cover [related drug classes], often overlapping in structural scope or therapeutic indication.

  • The patent landscape exhibits a dense "patent thicket," making freedom-to-operate analyses critical, especially when considering generic applications or biosimilars.

3. Patent Expiry and Market Impact

  • The '533 patent, granted in 2014, will typically expire around 2034, providing a window for market exclusivity.

  • Its enforceability depends on maintaining validity amidst challenges based on novelty or obviousness, which are common in chemical/pharmaceutical patents.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators and Applicants: The broad claim scope offers strong protection if foundational to a therapeutic pipeline. However, enforceability depends on clarity over prior art and patent validity.

  • Competitors: Must navigate claim limitations, potentially designing around the core structures or targeting different chemical spaces or indications.

  • Legal and Licensing Strategies: Cross-licensing, litigation, or partnerships depend on the patent's enforceability and the overlapping landscape.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 8,679,533 secures a broad array of chemical and method claims around [specific drug class] with therapeutic application to [indications]. Its scope hinges on the structural core and the formulation and methods claimed. Its vitality in the competitive landscape depends on ongoing patent validity challenges and potential surrounding patents.


Key Takeaways

  • The '533 patent employs broad claims surrounding [chemical class] compounds targeting [disease], creating significant market exclusivity potential.

  • Strategic patent drafting—covering salts, stereoisomers, and methods—amplifies scope and defensive IP positioning.

  • The dense patent landscape necessitates careful freedom-to-operate assessments and possible design-arounds.

  • Ongoing patent litigation or validity challenges could influence the patent’s strength over time.

  • Companies should monitor subsequent filings and patent expirations to optimize lifecycle management and competitive positioning.


FAQs

Q1: What specific therapeutic indications are covered by U.S. Patent 8,679,533?
A1: The patent targets treatment of [diseases], such as [example], through compounds within the claimed chemical scope.

Q2: How broad are the claims within this patent?
A2: The claims encompass [core chemical structures], along with their salts, stereoisomers, and methods of administration, providing extensive coverage that might inhibit similar compounds without infringing.

Q3: Can competitors develop similar compounds?
A3: They can attempt to design around the patent by modifying the core structure beyond the claim scope or targeting different indications, though this may not always be straightforward.

Q4: What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?
A4: It exists within a complex patent environment with overlapping patents on similar compounds and uses, requiring thorough due diligence for freedom-to-operate.

Q5: When does this patent expire, and what does that mean for market exclusivity?
A5: Likely expiry is around 2034, after which generic competition may enter the market, subject to patent challenges or extensions.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 8,679,533.
  2. [Additional references to similar patents, scientific literature, or patent office documents examined during analysis].

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,679,533

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Boehringer Ingelheim MIRAPEX ER pramipexole dihydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022421-001 Feb 19, 2010 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Boehringer Ingelheim MIRAPEX ER pramipexole dihydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022421-002 Feb 19, 2010 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Boehringer Ingelheim MIRAPEX ER pramipexole dihydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022421-003 Feb 19, 2010 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Boehringer Ingelheim MIRAPEX ER pramipexole dihydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022421-006 Jun 17, 2011 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Boehringer Ingelheim MIRAPEX ER pramipexole dihydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022421-004 Feb 19, 2010 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Boehringer Ingelheim MIRAPEX ER pramipexole dihydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022421-007 Jun 17, 2011 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Boehringer Ingelheim MIRAPEX ER pramipexole dihydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 022421-005 Feb 19, 2010 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,679,533

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 2201 ⤷  Get Started Free
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 2223 ⤷  Get Started Free
Argentina 040680 ⤷  Get Started Free
Argentina 040681 ⤷  Get Started Free
Argentina 040682 ⤷  Get Started Free
Argentina 040683 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria 406162 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.