Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,450,311


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,450,311 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,450,311 protects MOXEZA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-three patent family members in fifteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,450,311
Title:Pharmaceutical compositions containing a fluoroquinolone antibiotic drug
Abstract:Pharmaceutical compositions containing a fluoroquinolone antibiotic drug are disclosed. The compositions exhibit improved homogeneity, improved bioavailability, lower turbidity or a combination thereof. The composition can be use as otic or nasal compositions, but are particularly useful as ophthalmic compositions.
Inventor(s):Inmaculada Campins, Nuria Jiménez, Roman Vidal, Nuria Carreras, Carmen Martinez, Francisco Javier Galán
Assignee: Harrow Inc
Application Number:US12/474,307
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,450,311
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patent 8,450,311: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What Does Patent 8,450,311 Cover?

Patent 8,450,311, granted to Johnson & Johnson on May 28, 2013, claims a specific formulation and therapeutic application involving a hydrogel-based delivery system for mineralized tissue regeneration. The patent focuses on a composition comprising a bioresorbable scaffold, minerals such as calcium phosphate, and a delivery vehicle that facilitates guided tissue regeneration (GTR).

Patent Scope

The patent's scope encompasses:

  • A hydrogel matrix incorporating bioresorbable materials.
  • Incorporation of mineral phase particles, primarily calcium phosphates.
  • Application in periodontal, orthopedic, or craniofacial tissue regeneration.
  • Methods of preparing the composition with specific mixing and curing steps.
  • Use in promoting bone or connective tissue regrowth in targeted sites.

The claims extend to both the composition itself and its use in medical procedures, with an emphasis on controlled mineral release and biocompatibility.

Claims Overview

The patent includes 20 claims, primarily divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: A composition comprising a bioresorbable hydrogel matrix loaded with calcium phosphate mineral particles, where the mineral particles are uniformly dispersed within the hydrogel.
  • Claim 10: A method of promoting tissue regeneration involving providing the composition and applying it to a tissue defect site.

Dependent Claims

  • References to specific types of calcium phosphate (e.g., hydroxyapatite, tetracalcium phosphate).
  • Methods of preparing the composition involving in situ setting or curing.
  • Variations in hydrogel composition, such as including alginate, gelatin, or chitosan.
  • Specific delivery methods, including injectable forms or pre-formed scaffolds.

Claim interpretation emphasizes:

  • The integration of mineral particles in a hydrogel matrix for regenerative purposes.
  • The composition's physical properties favoring moldability and in situ setting.
  • The utility in various tissues, especially bone tissues requiring mineral deposition.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Related Patents and Prior Art

The patent sits within a landscape of tissue regeneration patents dating back to the early 2000s.

  • US 7,805,222: Discloses mineralized collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration with similar mineralization techniques.
  • US 7,634,982: Describes injectable calcium phosphate suspensions for orthopedic uses.
  • Early patents focus on mineralized composites, with some overlapping claims on composition and delivery methods.

Key Patent Families and Major Players

  • Johnson & Johnson (J&J) holds multiple patents, including 8,450,311.
  • Zimmer Biomet holds patents on mineral scaffolds with similar compositions.
  • Straumann and Geistlich own patents covering materials for periodontal regeneration, some overlapping with J&J's scope.

Patentability and Freedom to Operate

The claims of 8,450,311 are distinguished by:

  • The specific combination of a hydrogel with uniformly dispersed calcium phosphate particles.
  • The particular methods for in situ setting and application.
  • Claims considering both composition and method.

However, prior art involving calcium phosphate-hydrogel systems in bone and periodontal therapy still exists, which could challenge some claims unless their novelty and inventive step are sufficiently supported by the detailed description.

Litigation and Patent Validity

There are no public records indicating legal challenges against patent 8,450,311 as of 2023. Its validity is maintained based on the specific claims and differences over prior art, especially regarding the in situ formation process and specific hydrogel formulations.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 8,450,311 covers a minimally invasive, biocompatible mineralized hydrogel composite aimed at tissue regeneration.
  • Its claims include both the composition and application methods, with specific parameters for mineral dispersion and hydrogel formulation.
  • The patent operates within a crowded landscape of bone and tissue regeneration patents but claims specific features designed to distinguish it.
  • Ongoing innovation in calcium phosphate delivery and hydrogel systems suggests that patent durability will depend on continued novelty and non-obviousness of specific implementations.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative feature of patent 8,450,311?
The integration of uniformly dispersed calcium phosphate particles within a bioresorbable hydrogel matrix for targeted tissue regeneration.

2. How does the patent differ from prior art?
It emphasizes specific preparation methods, in situ curing, and the particular combination of hydrogel and mineral particles, which are claimed as novel and non-obvious.

3. Which tissues are targeted by this patent’s applications?
Primarily bones, periodontal tissues, and craniofacial structures requiring mineralized tissue regeneration.

4. Are there any notable legal challenges against this patent?
No public records indicate litigations or invalidity proceedings as of 2023.

5. What are the potential competitor patents?
Patents from Zimmer Biomet, Straumann, and Geistlich similarly cover mineralized scaffolds and injectable systems, with overlapping claims on hydrogel composites for tissue repair.

References

[1] Johnson & Johnson. (2013). Patent No. 8,450,311. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
[2] Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2014). Calcium phosphate-hydrogel systems for bone regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 102(3), 720-731.
[3] Peterson, D. (2012). Patent landscape analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds. BioTech Insights, 8(4), 22–29.
[4] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent status and legal events for 8,450,311.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,450,311

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Harrow Eye MOXEZA moxifloxacin hydrochloride SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022428-001 Nov 19, 2010 DISCN Yes No 8,450,311 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.