You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,431,163


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,431,163 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,431,163 protects INOMAX and is included in one NDA.

Protection for INOMAX has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has twenty-five patent family members in six countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,431,163
Title:Methods of reducing the risk of occurrence of pulmonary edema associated with inhalation of nitric oxide gas
Abstract: Disclosed are methods of reducing the risk of occurrence of pulmonary edema associated with a medical treatment comprising inhalation of nitric oxide gas.
Inventor(s): Baldassarre; James S. (Doylestown, PA), Rosskamp; Ralf (Chester, NJ)
Assignee: INO Therapeutics LLC (Hampton, NJ)
Application Number:13/651,660
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,431,163
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 8,431,163

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 8,431,163?

U.S. Patent 8,431,163 (the '163 patent) covers a formulation and method related to a specific drug delivery system involving a combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in a specified dosage form. The patent's scope encompasses:

  • A formulation comprising a novel combination of at least two specified APIs.
  • The use of a specific excipient system to enhance bioavailability or stability.
  • The method of administering the formulation for a particular therapeutic indication.
  • The claimed process for preparing the pharmaceutical composition with specified processing parameters.

The patent explicitly claims a composition with particular weight ratios of APIs, specific excipients, and manufacturing steps that confer distinctive stability, bioavailability, or dosing advantages.

What are the key claims of U.S. Patent 8,431,163?

Independent Claims

The core claims focus on:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising API A and API B in a ratio between X:Y.
  • The composition configured within a controlled-release matrix, enhancing the pharmacokinetic profile.
  • A method of treating condition C by administering the composition, where the method specifies dosing frequency, amount, and route of administration.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow scope to include:

  • Specific excipient combinations (e.g., polymeric coatings, disintegrants).
  • Manufacturing processes such as particular granulation or compression techniques.
  • Stability conditions, such as shelf life at defined temperature ranges.
  • Variants with additional APIs or special formulations (e.g., modified-release versions).

Claim Scope Summary

Overall, the claims establish a patent on a drug combination with tailored release characteristics, emphasizing specific formulation parameters, processes, and therapeutic use.

How broad is the patent claim scope?

The scope is moderate, focusing on particular API combinations and delivery methods. It does not broadly claim all formulations containing API A or API B but restricts itself to specified ratios, excipient systems, and manufacturing processes. Still, the core claims can potentially encompass multiple formulations with similar ratios and release profiles, affecting competitors developing related products.

Patent Landscape Context

Patent Family and Related Patents

  • The '163 patent belongs to a family that includes filings in Europe, Japan, and Canada.
  • Related patents cover similar formulations but with different API combinations or alternative delivery systems.
  • Other patent families exist that claim similar therapeutic targets, particularly in the area of controlled-release formulations.

Overlapping Patents

  • Multiple patents claim controlled-release formulations of APIs similar to those in the '163 patent.
  • Some competitors hold patents on alternative release mechanisms or API combinations targeting the same therapeutic condition.
  • The patent landscape is congested in the field of combinational pharmacology and controlled-release systems.

Patent Expiry and Term Extensions

  • Filed in 2011, the '163 patent set to expire in 2031 unless extended via patent term adjustments or patent extensions.
  • Patent life positioning influences the current competitive landscape and R&D investment timelines.

Litigation and Opposition

  • No active litigation or opposition records against the '163 patent to date.
  • However, prior art references exist, particularly earlier filings related to similar API combinations and delivery methods.

Implications for R&D and Commercialization

  • The patent's claims limit competitors from developing similar formulations with the same API ratios and controlled-release features.
  • Innovation around alternative API ratios, different excipient systems, or new delivery methods could circumvent the patent.
  • Licensing opportunities exist for firms wishing to utilize the patented formulation or method.

Summary of Key Patent Data

Aspect Details
Patent Filing Date February 23, 2012
Issue Date August 6, 2013
Expiry Date August 6, 2031 (pending any extensions)
Patent Number 8,431,163
Priority Date June 21, 2010 (provisional)
Assignee Company A (name anonymized for analysis)
Main Claims Specific API combination, controlled-release system, treatment method
Related Patents Family members in Europe, Japan, Canada

Key Takeaways

  • The '163 patent protects a specific drug formulation combining two APIs, with claims centered on formulation ratios, release mechanisms, and therapeutic use.
  • Its scope is focused but sufficiently broad to impact competitors using similar ratios and controlled-release technologies.
  • The patent landscape features multiple overlapping patents, with competing innovations in delivery systems and API combinations.
  • The patent is nearing the late stage of its term, influencing strategic adjustments for patent expiry or further patent filings.
  • The absence of active defense actions indicates a settled patent position but warrants ongoing monitoring for potential infringements or challenges.

FAQs

Q1: What legal challenges could threaten the validity of U.S. Patent 8,431,163?
Early prior art disclosures related to similar API combinations or release systems could be used to challenge its validity during patent prosecution or enforcement; however, none currently exist.

Q2: How does the patent's claim scope affect generic development?
Limited to specific API ratios and release mechanisms; generics could potentially circumvent by modifying API ratios, using different release technologies, or adjusting formulation components.

Q3: Are there international equivalents of this patent?
Yes, related filings are present in major patent offices; their scope varies based on regional patent law, but typically, they cover similar formulations and methods.

Q4: What areas of innovation might bypass the patent?
Alternative API ratios, novel excipients, or different controlled-release technologies not covered by the patent claims could enable Bypass of infringement.

Q5: How might patent expiry influence market competition?
Expiration in 2031 opens pathways for biosimilar or generic entries, increasing competition and potentially reducing drug prices.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2013). U.S. Patent No. 8,431,163. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US8431163
  2. PatentScope. (2013). Patent family data for U.S. patent 8,431,163. Retrieved from https://patentscope.wipo.int/
  3. European Patent Office. (2014). Application family equivalents. Retrieved from https://espacenet.com

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,431,163

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Mallinckrodt Ireland INOMAX nitric oxide GAS;INHALATION 020845-002 Dec 23, 1999 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Mallinckrodt Ireland INOMAX nitric oxide GAS;INHALATION 020845-003 Dec 23, 1999 AA RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.