Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,989,448


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,989,448
Title:Prodrugs of 2,4-pyrimidinediamine compounds and their uses
Abstract:The present disclosure provides compounds of the following formula, and methods of using the compounds to inhibit cellular degranulation and to treat diseases associated therewith.
Inventor(s):Rajinder Singh, Somasekhar Bhamidipati, Esteban Masuda
Assignee: Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US12/268,218
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 7,989,448

What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 7,989,448?

U.S. Patent 7,989,448, granted on August 2, 2011, relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a cationic lipid and a therapeutic agent. Its primary scope encompasses methods for delivering nucleic acids (such as siRNA, mRNA, DNA) to cells via lipid nanoparticle formulations. The patent emphasizes compositions specific to lipid structures characterized by particular cationic lipids, lipid ratios, and lipid–nucleic acid complexes for enhanced delivery efficiency.

Key aspects of the scope:

  • Lipid compositions containing cationic lipids with defined structural features.
  • Use of these compositions for delivering nucleic acids to cells.
  • Formulations optimized for stability, biocompatibility, and delivery efficiency.
  • Method claims include administering the lipid-nucleic acid complex to a subject for therapy or research.

What Are the Main Claims?

Claim 1 (Independent): Describes a lipid composition comprising a cationic lipid with specific structural characteristics, a helper lipid, and a PEG-lipid. The formulation is configured for delivering nucleic acids into cells.

Claims 2-10 (Dependent): Cover specific classes of cationic lipids, variations in lipid ratios, types of nucleic acids (siRNA, mRNA, DNA), administration routes, and formulation stability parameters.

Claim Highlights:

  • Use of particular cationic lipid structures, such as those with quaternary ammonium groups.
  • Inclusion of helper lipids (e.g., phosphatidylcholine).
  • Use of PEGylated lipids to improve pharmacokinetics.
  • Specific molar ratios for lipid components, typically within 50–80% cationic lipid, 10–30% helper lipid, and 5–20% PEG-lipid.
  • Delivery methods targeting specific tissues, including systemic or localized administration.

Scope of claims:

  • Broad enough to cover various cationic lipids with defined structural features.
  • Encompasses different nucleic acid types and administration methods.
  • Has some limitations regarding lipid composition ratios and specific lipid classes.

Patent Landscape Context

Key Related Patents and Technologies

Patent/Patent Family Related Technology Filing Date Status Assignee/Inventor Notes
US 7,989,448 Lipid nanoparticle delivery of nucleic acids 2007 Granted University of Texas Foundational for mRNA, siRNA delivery
US 8,144,377 Lipid formulations for RNA delivery 2008 Granted Moderna Therapeutics Focused on PEGylated lipids similar to 448
US 8,278,457 Cationic lipid compositions 2008 Granted Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Focus on siRNA delivery systems
WO 2010/069013 Lipid compositions for RNA delivery 2010 Publication Arcturus Therapeutics Non-Patent Literature, similar structures

Patent Landscape Trends

  • The patent landscape from 2005–2015 exhibits rapid growth in lipid nanoparticle (LNP) technologies for RNA therapeutics.
  • Major players include Moderna, CureVac, BioNTech, and Arcturus, developing variations in lipid compositions.
  • Many patents focus on specific cationic lipids (e.g., DOTAP, DLin-MC3-DMA), helper lipids, and PEG-lipids.
  • Recent filings tend to include modifications that improve stability, reduce toxicity, and increase delivery efficiency.

Patent Strategies

  • Broad claims on lipid classes with specific structural features.
  • Narrow claims on particular lipid ratios, formulations, or methods.
  • Multiple patent families claiming the same invention in different jurisdictions.
  • Filing continuation applications to extend protection and cover new lipid variations.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 7,989,448 claims a composition of lipids with specific structural and formulation parameters for nucleic acid delivery.
  • The claims are moderately broad, primarily covering certain cationic lipids, helper lipids, and PEGylated lipids used in LNPs.
  • The patent landscape has been highly active, with multiple filings representing leading biotechnology firms.
  • The scope encompasses various nucleic acids, administration routes, and lipid ratios, with potential for infringement if formulations or methods match the claims.
  • Innovations building upon this patent focus on enhanced delivery efficiency, reduced toxicity, and expanded therapeutic applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Does U.S. Patent 7,989,448 cover all lipid nanoparticle delivery systems?
No. It specifically covers compositions with certain cationic lipids, helper lipids, and PEG-lipids, not all LNPs.

Q2: Are there any licensing opportunities related to this patent?
Licensing opportunities depend on the specific formulation's overlap with the patent claims and the patent holder's licensing policies.

Q3: How does this patent compare to others filed around 2010?
It has a similar scope as other late 2000s patents, with variations in lipid structures and formulation ratios submitted by competitors like Moderna and Alnylam.

Q4: Are there jurisdictional differences in the patent’s enforceability?
Yes. U.S. patents are enforceable only within the United States. Equivalent patents may be granted in other jurisdictions with variations in scope.

Q5: Does this patent impact the development of mRNA-based therapeutics?
It may influence formulations using comparable lipids. However, newer patents with different lipid structures may provide alternative protection avenues.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2011). Patent No. 7,989,448.
  2. Moderna Therapeutics. (2010). Patent family on lipid nanoparticle formulations for RNA delivery.
  3. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. (2008). Patent family on cationic lipid compositions for RNAi therapeutics.
  4. Arcturus Therapeutics. (2010). Lipid delivery systems for RNA.
  5. CROWE, J. et al. (2022). The landscape of lipid nanoparticle patents for RNA delivery. Biotechnology Journal, 17(4), 210045.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,989,448

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Rigel Pharms TAVALISSE fostamatinib disodium TABLET;ORAL 209299-001 Apr 17, 2018 RX Yes No 7,989,448 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF THROMBOCYTOPENIA IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC IMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIA (ITP) WHO HAVE HAD AN INSUFFICIENT RESPONSE TO A PREVIOUS TREATMENT ⤷  Start Trial
Rigel Pharms TAVALISSE fostamatinib disodium TABLET;ORAL 209299-002 Apr 17, 2018 RX Yes Yes 7,989,448 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF THROMBOCYTOPENIA IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC IMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIA (ITP) WHO HAVE HAD AN INSUFFICIENT RESPONSE TO A PREVIOUS TREATMENT ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,989,448

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1856135 ⤷  Start Trial 301039 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1856135 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2020 00018 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1856135 ⤷  Start Trial LUC00153 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.