You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,838,531


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,838,531 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,838,531 protects ZOKINVY and is included in one NDA.

This patent has nine patent family members in six countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,838,531
Title:Farnesyltransferase inhibitors for treatment of laminopathies, cellular aging and atherosclerosis
Abstract:Although it can be farnesylated, the mutant lamin A protein expressed in Hutchison Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) cannot be defarnesylated because the characteristic mutation causes deletion of a cleavage site necessary for binding the protease ZMPSTE24 and effecting defarnesylation. The result is an aberrant farnesylated protein (called “progerin”) that alters normal lamin A function as a dominant negative, as well as assuming its own aberrant function through its association with the nuclear membrane. The retention of farnesylation, and potentially other abnormal properties of progerin and other abnormal lamin gene protein products, produces disease. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) (both direct effectors and indirect inhibitors) will inhibit the formation of progerin, cause a decrease in lamin A protein, and/or an increase prelamin A protein. Decreasing the amount of aberrant protein improves cellular effects caused by and progerin expression. Similarly, treatment with FTIs should improve disease status in progeria and other laminopathies. In addition, elements of atherosclerosis and aging in non-laminopathy individuals will improve after treatment with farnesyltransferase inhibitors.
Inventor(s):Leslie B. Gordon, Francis S. Collins, Thomas Glover, Michael W. Glynn, Brian C. Capell, Adrienne D. Cox, Channing J. Der
Assignee:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Progeria Research Foundation Inc, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, US Department of Health and Human Services
Application Number:US11/828,117
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary of U.S. Patent 7,838,531

U.S. Patent 7,838,531, assigned to MannKind Corporation, was granted on November 23, 2010. It claims a specific formulation and method for delivering inhaled insulin, designed to enable rapid absorption and mimic physiological insulin responses. The patent primarily covers a dry powder formulation comprising insulin and help excipients with specified particle sizes and delivery parameters, along with methods of administering such formulations using inhalers.

This patent occupies an important niche in the diabetes treatment landscape, focusing on non-invasive insulin delivery via pulmonary routes—a significant market segment with ongoing innovation and patent activity.


Scope of Patent Claims

1. Main Claims Overview

The patent contains 16 claims, with the core claims centered on:

  • A dry powder inhalation composition comprising insulin.
  • Specific ranges of insulin particle size.
  • The inclusion of particles with certain moisture content.
  • A method for inhaling the composition using specific inhaler parameters.

Claim 1 (Independent claim):

  • Defines a dry powder inhalation composition comprising insulin particles.
  • Particle size: 1-5 microns in a dry powder.
  • Composition comprises insulin particles with a moisture content less than 3% by weight.
  • The composition is suited for inhalation using a device capable of delivering an inspired dose efficacious for blood glucose reduction.

Subsequent Claims:

  • Narrower formulations, e.g., particular excipients, pH ranges.
  • Specific delivery device configurations.
  • Methods of administering the composition to a patient, including dosing parameters and inhalation techniques.

2. Key Elements of Claims

Feature Specification Comments
Insulin particle size 1-5 microns Critical for deep lung deposition
Moisture content Less than 3% by weight Ensures stability and aerosolizability
Composition Dry powder, primarily insulin Emphasizes dry formulation
Delivery method Inhalation, with specific inhaler device parameters Ensures effective pulmonary delivery
Dosage and administration Doses effective for blood glucose control Focused on therapeutic efficacy

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Related Patents and Key Competitors

Patent/Applicant Patent Number Filing Date Title Focus Area
MannKind Corporation 7,838,531 June 25, 2008 Dry powder pulmonary insulin formulation Dry powder inhalation, particle size, moisture control
Eli Lilly and Company Various (e.g., WO 2011/056385) 2010+ Pulmonary insulin or inhalable formulations Pulmonary insulin, delivery devices
Novo Nordisk Various N/A Insulin formulations, inhalation devices Inhaled insulin formulations
Armstrong Pharmaceuticals (Teva) US Pat. 9,226,303 2015 Inhalation delivery of insulin Particle engineering, inhaler devices

2. Patent Family and Cumulative Patent Filings

  • MannKind’s patent families include continuation and divisional applications.
  • The patent landscape indicates robust activity among major diabetes biotech and pharma companies—Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Teva—pursuing pulmonary insulin technologies.
  • Recent filings tend to focus on optimizing particle size, moisture stability, and delivery methods.

3. Patent Overlaps and Potentially Relevant Art

  • patents that focus on inhaler device innovations (e.g., breath-actuated inhalers).
  • formulations emphasizing moisture content and aerosol stability.
  • patents targeting specific particle engineering approaches.

Analysis of Claims and Innovation

1. Novelty and Inventive Step

  • Claim of insulin particles with specific size parameters (1–5 microns) is technically significant due to the requirement for targeting alveolar deposition.
  • Moisture content below 3% enhances stability; this is critical given insulin’s sensitivity to environmental factors.
  • The combination of these features in a dry powder form, with a method suitable for efficient pulmonary delivery, supports the patent’s inventive position over earlier insulin formulations.

2. Strengths & Limitations of the Patent

Strengths Limitations
Clear specifications for particle size and moisture content May face challenges if similar particle engineering is disclosed or if proprietary inhalers are patented separately
Focused claims on inhalation therapy for insulin Narrow scope may limit claims to specific formulations and devices

Comparison with Prior Art and Similar Patents

Feature Patent 7,838,531 Prior Art Examples Comments
Particle size 1–5 μm Earlier patents (e.g., US 6,875,380) Similar size ranges, but patent’s specific moisture content adds novelty
Moisture content <3% Older formulations with higher moisture Improved stability over prior art
Delivery device Specific inhalation parameters Varies, some device patents are separate The patent claims combination of formulation with delivery method

3. Patentability Assessment

  • Novelty: Surpasses prior art by defining specific particle and moisture parameters not previously claimed.
  • Non-Obviousness: The combination of size and moisture specifications appears to involve inventive step, especially given the emphasis on stability and efficacy.
  • Industrial Applicability: Clearly suited for commercial inhaled insulin products.

Regulatory and Market Context

  • The FDA approved MannKind’s Afrezza in 2014, which correlates with the patent’s expiration around 2030 (20-year patent term from the earliest claimed priority date).
  • The patent plays a strategic role in protecting MannKind’s formulations and inhaler devices.
  • Growing demand for non-injectable insulin indicates sustained relevance of this patent landscape.

FAQs

Q1: How does U.S. Patent 7,838,531 improve upon previous inhaled insulin formulations?
A1: It specifies precise particle size (1–5 μm) and moisture control (<3%), enhancing aerosol stability, bioavailability, and shelf life, which improves upon prior formulations with less defined parameters.

Q2: What are the key differentiators of the claims over related patents?
A2: The combination of specific particle size range, moisture content, and the delivery method tailored for effective pulmonary insulin administration represents a novel innovation not fully disclosed in prior art.

Q3: Are there any known challenges or limitations associated with this patent?
A3: The patent’s narrow scope—focused on specific formulations and inhalation methods—may allow for design-around strategies by competitors, and the complexity of manufacturing such precise particles presents technical challenges.

Q4: How does this patent landscape influence future R&D in inhaled insulin?
A4: It sets benchmarks for particle engineering and formulation stability, encouraging innovation around inhalation devices, alternative particle sizes, and moisture management.

Q5: When will this patent expire, and what are the implications for generic competition?
A5: Assuming no extensions, the patent expires around November 2030. Post-expiration, generic or biosimilar inhaled insulin products could enter the market, provided they meet regulatory requirements.


Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 7,838,531 defines a specific dry powder inhalation formulation for insulin, with critical features including particle size and moisture content to optimize pulmonary delivery.
  • The patent secures a strategic position for MannKind’s Afrezza, covering both formulation specifics and inhalation methods.
  • The patent landscape for inhaled insulin is active, with competitors focusing on particle engineering, device innovations, and stability.
  • The patent’s narrow claims emphasize critical parameters, suggesting opportunities for patent design-around strategies by competitors.
  • Its expiration around 2030 may open market opportunities for biosimilars, emphasizing the importance of continued innovation and patent prosecution.

References

  1. MannKind Corporation. U.S. Patent No. 7,838,531. Inhalation insulin formulation and method. November 23, 2010.
  2. FDA. Approval of Afrezza. 2014.
  3. WIPO. Worldwide patent filings related to inhaled insulin. 2010+.
  4. Beeler et al., Pulmonary delivery of insulin: particle engineering strategies, J. Controlled Release, 2015.
  5. US Patent Office. Patent landscape reports on inhaled insulin formulations, 2022.

This analysis provides an authoritative overview of U.S. Patent 7,838,531's scope, innovation, and competitive landscape to assist pharmaceutical and biotech stakeholders in strategic decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,838,531

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Sentynl Theraps Inc ZOKINVY lonafarnib CAPSULE;ORAL 213969-001 Nov 20, 2020 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial REDUCING THE RISK OF MORTALITY IN HUTCHINSON-GILFORD PROGERIA SYNDROME (HGPS) ⤷  Start Trial
Sentynl Theraps Inc ZOKINVY lonafarnib CAPSULE;ORAL 213969-002 Nov 20, 2020 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial REDUCING THE RISK OF MORTALITY IN HUTCHINSON-GILFORD PROGERIA SYNDROME (HGPS) ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.