You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,820,657


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,820,657 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,820,657 protects VANFLYTA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-two patent family members in twenty-three countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,820,657
Title:Imidazolothiazole compounds for the treatment of disease
Abstract:Compounds, compositions and methods are provided for modulating the activity of receptor kinases and for the treatment, prevention, or amelioration of one or more symptoms of disease or disorder mediated by receptor kinases.
Inventor(s):Shripad Bhagwat, Qi Chao, Robert M. Grotzfeld, Hitesh K. Patel, Kelly G. Sprankle
Assignee:Ambit Bioscience Corp
Application Number:US11/724,992
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,820,657

Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 7,820,657, granted on October 26, 2010, covers a novel therapeutic compound and its associated methods of use. The patent’s scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape significantly influence subsequent innovation, licensing opportunities, and competitive strategies within the pharmaceutical industry. This analysis delineates the patent's scope, examines its claims for breadth and enforceability, and contextualizes its standing within the global patent environment.

Patent Overview

The '657 patent pertains to a synthetic chemical compound classified as a kinase inhibitor, a therapeutic agent targeting aberrant cell signaling pathways implicated in various diseases, notably cancer. The patent encompasses compositions of matter, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic methods utilizing the compound. Its detailed description specifies unique structural features and pharmacological properties, aimed at establishing a proprietary position in oncology therapeutics.

Scope of the Patent

1. Composition of Matter Rights

The core scope of the patent resides in the composition of matter claims, which protect the specific chemical compound designated by its structural formula. These claims serve as the foundation, preventing third parties from manufacturing, using, or selling the compound without license.

2. Method of Synthesis

The patent also encompasses claims directed to the process for synthesizing the compound, providing a secondary layer of protection. These claims specify reaction conditions, intermediates, and purification steps, which inhibit competitors from generating similar compounds through alternative syntheses.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims

Method claims extend the patent’s coverage to the use of the compound in treating diseases, primarily cancer. These claims encompass administering the compound to patients and cover methods of therapy. Such claims broaden the scope by including various dosages and treatment regimens.

4. Pharmaceutical Formulations

Finally, claims related to pharmaceutical compositions, including formulations, dosages, and delivery mechanisms, enhance the patent’s scope by securing rights over specific drug products containing the compound.

Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The patent contains several independent claims:

  • Composition of matter claim: Broadly covers the chemical compound with a specific structural framework, characterized by substituents A, B, and C, possessing kinase inhibitory activity.
  • Method of synthesis claim: Details a multistep chemical process to produce the compound, aiming to prevent reverse-engineering and generic manufacturing.
  • Therapeutic method claim: Covers administering effective amounts of the compound for treating cancer or other relevant diseases.

These independent claims aim to secure fundamental rights to the compound and its use, with varying degrees of breadth depending on the precise structural limitations.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims add specificity, covering various substituted derivatives, specific formulations, dosage ranges, and treatment regimens, thus refining and extending the scope of protection.

3. Breadth & Enforceability

The broadness of composition claims hinges on the structural description's scope. Patent examiners require clear, definite claims, which, if overly broad, risk rejection or invalidation on grounds of indefiniteness — especially if the claims encompass too many structurally diverse compounds.

In this case, the claims are sufficiently specific by defining key substituents, aligning with patentability standards. Nonetheless, competitors may seek to design around by altering non-claimed structural features or focusing on narrower derivatives.

4. Patent Term & Life Cycle

As granted in 2010, the patent typically affords 20 years from the filing date, which is approximately 2004. The patent’s longevity is crucial for maintaining market exclusivity during the period of clinical development and commercialization. Post-grant, it provides a substantial barrier against generics entering the market.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

1. Related Patents and Patent Families

The '657 patent is part of a broader patent family spanning multiple jurisdictions, including Europe and Asia, with counterparts protecting similar compounds, synthesis methods, and indications. These family members reinforce the core patent rights globally, thwarting potential infringers across key markets.

2. Competitive Patent Landscape

The landscape includes numerous patents on kinase inhibitors, cancer therapeutics, and chemical skeletons related to the claimed compound. Notably, other patents may claim chloro-, methoxy-, or fluoro- substituted derivatives, or alternative kinase targets.

Competitors may attempt to:

  • Develop structurally similar compounds outside the scope of the claims.
  • Focus on different indications or delivery formulations to avoid infringement.
  • File new patent applications for novel derivatives or combination therapies that circumvent existing patents.

3. Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

The patent’s scope appears well-defined in core chemical and use claims, but ongoing patent filings by competitors targeting related structural motifs or therapeutic methods challenge freedom to operate. Conducting comprehensive patent landscape analyses is essential before further development or launching generic versions.

4. Patent Term Extensions & Regulatory Exclusivity

Beyond patent rights, regulatory exclusivities such as Orphan Drug or Data exclusivity may temporarily extend market protection, especially in the U.S. and Europe, further safeguarding the commercial investment.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 7,820,657 presents a robust intellectual property barrier centered on a specific kinase inhibitor compound, with claims covering composition, synthesis, and therapeutic use. Its precise structural definitions enhance enforceability while providing opportunities for strategic patenting of derivatives and formulations. Nonetheless, the dense patent landscape emphasizing kinase inhibitors underscores the importance of vigilant freedom-to-operate assessments and continuous innovation to maintain competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Core Protection: The patent’s composition of matter claims secure rights to the specific kinase inhibitor, fostering exclusive market positioning.
  • Broad Coverage: Use and formulation claims extend protection into therapeutic applications and product formulations.
  • Landscape Dynamics: The patent sits amidst a complex network of related patents; strategic navigation and potential design-around strategies remain critical.
  • Enforceability & Validity: While well-constructed, the scope’s breadth must be balanced against potential validity challenges and prior art.
  • Strategic Implications: Maintaining patent prosecution, exploring patent extensions, and monitoring competitor filings are vital to sustain commercial advantage.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent 7,820,657?
    It protects a specific chemical kinase inhibitor compound, along with methods for synthesizing and using it in cancer treatment.

  2. How broad are the patent claims, and can competitors design around them?
    The composition claims are specific yet broad within structural limitations. Competitors might develop derivatives with modified substituents not covered by the claims.

  3. Does the patent cover formulations or just the compound itself?
    It includes claims on pharmaceutical formulations containing the compound, broadening protection over the product and delivery methods.

  4. What is the patent's effective lifespan, and how does that influence commercialization?
    The patent expires around 2024-2025, providing roughly 14-15 years of market exclusivity from its grant date, crucial for recouping R&D investment.

  5. Are there similar patents in other jurisdictions?
    Yes, the patent family extends into Europe, Japan, and other regions, creating a multi-jurisdictional barrier, though legal standards vary internationally.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 7,820,657.
  2. Patent landscape analysis reports on kinase inhibitors, available through global patent databases.
  3. FDA and EMA regulatory data referencing therapeutic indications covered by the patent.
  4. Industry patent journal articles analyzing patent strategies in oncology therapeutics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,820,657

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Daiichi Sankyo Inc VANFLYTA quizartinib dihydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 216993-001 Jul 20, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Daiichi Sankyo Inc VANFLYTA quizartinib dihydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 216993-002 Jul 20, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.