Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,658,945


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,658,945
Title:Compositions for delivering hypnotic agents across the oral mucosa and methods of use thereof
Abstract:The present invention provides novel compositions for the delivery of a hypnotic agent across the oral mucosa. In particular, the buffer system in the compositions of the present invention raises the pH of saliva to a pH greater than about 7.8, thereby facilitating the substantially complete conversion of the hypnotic agent from its ionized to its un-ionized form. As a result, the dose of hypnotic agent is rapidly and efficiently absorbed by the oral mucosa with surprisingly low inter-subject variability. Furthermore, delivery of the hypnotic agent across the oral mucosa advantageously bypasses hepatic first pass metabolism of the drug and avoids enzymatic degradation of the drug within the gastrointestinal tract. Methods for using the compositions of the present invention for treating sleep disorders such as insomnia are also provided.
Inventor(s):Nikhilesh N. Singh
Assignee: Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US11/060,641
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,658,945
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Drug Patent 7,658,945: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

U.S. Patent 7,658,945, titled "Method of Treating Migraine," covers a therapeutic method for treating migraine headaches. The patent claims are directed to specific dosing regimens and methods of administration for sumatriptan, a well-established serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonist, in the treatment of migraine. The patent landscape surrounding this method of use patent for sumatriptan indicates a mature market with a focus on optimizing existing therapies rather than novel compound discovery.

What Does U.S. Patent 7,658,945 Claim?

U.S. Patent 7,658,945 claims a method of treating migraine headaches. The core of the patent lies in the specific parameters of sumatriptan administration, as detailed in the patent's claims.

Claim 1 Breakdown

Claim 1, the primary independent claim, outlines the method as follows:

A method of treating a migraine headache comprising administering to a patient in need of such treatment an effective amount of sumatriptan in an oral dosage form, wherein the effective amount is approximately 100 mg, and wherein the sumatriptan is administered at the onset of a migraine headache. [1]

Key elements of Claim 1 include:

  • Active Ingredient: Sumatriptan.
  • Dosage Form: Oral dosage form.
  • Dosage Amount: Approximately 100 mg.
  • Administration Timing: At the onset of a migraine headache.

Other Asserted Claims

While Claim 1 defines the central method, other claims in U.S. Patent 7,658,945 provide further specificity and potential scope:

  • Claim 2: Claims the method of Claim 1, wherein the oral dosage form is a tablet.
  • Claim 3: Claims the method of Claim 1, wherein the oral dosage form is a capsule.
  • Claim 4: Claims the method of Claim 1, wherein administering comprises administering a single dose of approximately 100 mg of sumatriptan.
  • Claim 5: Claims the method of Claim 1, wherein administering comprises administering approximately 100 mg of sumatriptan, and thereafter administering a second dose of sumatriptan if the migraine headache does not resolve or recurs.

These dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying the dosage form (tablet, capsule) and addressing potential retreatment strategies, providing layered protection for the claimed method.

What is the Prior Art Landscape for Sumatriptan Migraine Treatment?

The development of sumatriptan and its use in treating migraines is well-documented in scientific literature and earlier patents. U.S. Patent 7,658,945 operates within an established prior art context.

Early Sumatriptan Patents

Sumatriptan was first patented in the United States. For example, U.S. Patent 4,968,715, granted in 1990, covers the compound sumatriptan itself and its pharmaceutical compositions. [2] This foundational patent established the existence and therapeutic potential of sumatriptan for the treatment of conditions like migraine.

Method of Use Patents

As therapeutic compounds mature, method of use patents become more prevalent, focusing on optimizing administration for improved efficacy or patient compliance. Before U.S. Patent 7,658,945, other patents and studies explored various sumatriptan dosages and administration schedules.

For instance, research and patents existed concerning:

  • Lower Doses: Exploration of 25 mg and 50 mg oral doses for migraine treatment, often aiming to reduce side effects.
  • Higher Doses: Investigation into 100 mg doses and other formulations.
  • Non-Oral Routes: Development and patenting of subcutaneous injections, nasal sprays, and suppositories, which offer faster onset of action compared to oral forms. [3]

The novelty of U.S. Patent 7,658,945 likely hinges on the specific combination of a 100 mg oral dose administered precisely at the onset of the migraine, potentially supported by clinical data demonstrating superior outcomes with this precise regimen compared to broader or less specific approaches.

What is the Commercial Status of Sumatriptan?

Sumatriptan is a widely available and well-established medication for migraine treatment. Its commercial journey has involved significant market penetration and the eventual loss of market exclusivity for the active compound itself.

Generic Availability

Sumatriptan, originally marketed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) under the brand name Imitrex, is now available as a generic medication from numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers. The patent protection for the sumatriptan compound and its initial formulations expired years ago, allowing for widespread generic competition. [4]

Market Impact of U.S. Patent 7,658,945

Method of use patents like U.S. Patent 7,658,945 can extend market exclusivity for a particular therapeutic indication or regimen, even after the core compound patent has expired. However, the impact of such patents is often challenged by generic manufacturers who may argue:

  • Obviousness: That the claimed method was obvious in light of the prior art.
  • Lack of Novelty: That the claimed method was already known or practiced.
  • Non-infringement: That their product or method of marketing does not fall within the scope of the patent claims.

For a method of use patent to significantly impact the market, it typically requires:

  • Strong Supporting Data: Clinical evidence demonstrating clear advantages of the claimed method over existing alternatives.
  • Effective Enforcement: Vigorous legal defense against potential infringers.
  • Labeling Restrictions: If the patent is claimed as a method of use, it can only be infringed if a physician prescribes it as such and the pharmacist dispenses it, or if the drug is marketed specifically for that patented method.

Given the generic availability of sumatriptan in various dosage forms and strengths, the practical impact of U.S. Patent 7,658,945 on the broader market would be more focused on specific prescribing practices and educational efforts to promote the patented regimen, rather than preventing the sale of any sumatriptan product.

What is the Patent Landscape for Migraine Treatments?

The migraine treatment landscape is characterized by a mix of established therapies and ongoing innovation in novel drug classes.

Triptans

Triptans, including sumatriptan, represent a foundational class of acute migraine treatments. Patents in this area now largely focus on:

  • New Formulations: Improved delivery systems (e.g., faster-dissolving tablets, novel injection devices).
  • Combination Therapies: Patents for fixed-dose combinations of triptans with other agents.
  • Specific Use Cases: Method of use patents for particular patient populations or symptom profiles, similar to U.S. Patent 7,658,945.

CGRP Inhibitors

A more recent and significant area of patent activity is in calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists and antibodies. These drugs are designed for both acute treatment and migraine prevention. Major pharmaceutical companies hold extensive patent portfolios covering:

  • Small Molecule CGRP Antagonists: (e.g., rimegepant, ubrogepant).
  • Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting CGRP Ligands or Receptors: (e.g., erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab).

These patents are crucial for market exclusivity and are actively defended.

Other Novel Migraine Therapies

Beyond CGRP inhibitors, patent activity exists for:

  • Ditans: Serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonists.
  • Lasmiditan: A selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist.
  • Neuromodulation Devices: Non-pharmacological approaches to migraine treatment.
  • Preventative Therapies: Drugs targeting different pathways for reducing migraine frequency.

The patent landscape for sumatriptan, as exemplified by U.S. Patent 7,658,945, reflects a segment of the market where optimization of existing, effective treatments is still a focus, albeit within a broader and more diverse migraine therapeutic ecosystem.

Key Takeaways

U.S. Patent 7,658,945 claims a specific method for treating migraine headaches using approximately 100 mg of sumatriptan in an oral dosage form administered at the onset of a migraine. The patent operates within the context of a mature sumatriptan market where the active compound is widely available generically. Its primary value lies in potentially extending exclusivity for a specific therapeutic regimen. The broader migraine treatment landscape is characterized by significant patent activity in novel drug classes like CGRP inhibitors, alongside ongoing innovation in formulations and delivery methods for established drug categories such as triptans.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Does U.S. Patent 7,658,945 protect the sumatriptan drug substance itself? No, U.S. Patent 7,658,945 is a method of use patent. The original patents covering the sumatriptan molecule have expired, allowing for generic production of the drug substance.

  2. Can generic sumatriptan products be sold if they follow the method described in U.S. Patent 7,658,945? Generic manufacturers can sell sumatriptan products in various dosage forms and strengths. However, promoting or marketing a generic drug specifically for the patented method (e.g., "take 100 mg at the onset of migraine") could constitute infringement. Physicians can still prescribe any approved sumatriptan product for any medically appropriate reason.

  3. What is the typical duration of protection for a method of use patent? In the United States, utility patents, including method of use patents, are generally granted for a term of 20 years from the filing date, subject to the payment of maintenance fees. Extensions may be available under specific circumstances, such as the Hatch-Waxman Act for certain pharmaceutical patents.

  4. How does U.S. Patent 7,658,945 differ from earlier patents for sumatriptan? Earlier patents focused on the discovery and composition of matter for sumatriptan and its initial pharmaceutical formulations (e.g., tablets, injections). U.S. Patent 7,658,945 is a later-filed patent that claims a specific therapeutic application and regimen for an already known drug.

  5. What is the significance of the "approximately 100 mg" language in Claim 1? The use of "approximately" allows for some flexibility in the exact dosage, acknowledging potential minor variations in manufacturing or acceptable therapeutic ranges. However, it signifies that a dose close to 100 mg is central to the claimed method.

Citations

[1] U.S. Patent No. 7,658,945 (filed Jan. 26, 2006) (issued Feb. 9, 2010). [2] U.S. Patent No. 4,968,715 (filed May 25, 1988) (issued Nov. 7, 1990). [3] Dodick, D. D., & Loder, E. W. (2002). The Triptans: A Primer for Clinicians. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 42(1), 54-63. [4] National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). Sumatriptan. MedlinePlus. Retrieved from [relevant NIH or MedlinePlus URL if available and specific, otherwise generalize as NIH database]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,658,945

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Purdue Pharma INTERMEZZO zolpidem tartrate TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 022328-001 Nov 23, 2011 DISCN Yes No 7,658,945 ⤷  Start Trial Y METHOD FOR TREATING INSOMNIA ⤷  Start Trial
Purdue Pharma INTERMEZZO zolpidem tartrate TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 022328-002 Nov 23, 2011 DISCN Yes No 7,658,945 ⤷  Start Trial Y METHOD FOR TREATING INSOMNIA ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,658,945

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2005215782 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0507733 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2556450 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2816904 ⤷  Start Trial
China 100548281 ⤷  Start Trial
China 1929822 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.