You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 7,582,727


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,582,727 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,582,727 protects ANGIOMAX and is included in one NDA.

Protection for ANGIOMAX has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

Summary for Patent: 7,582,727
Title:Pharmaceutical formulations of bivalirudin and processes of making the same
Abstract:Pharmaceutical batch(es) or pharmaceutical formulation(s) comprising bivalirudin as the active ingredient, and a method of preparing the pharmaceutical batch(es) or pharmaceutical formulation(s). The pharmaceutical batch(es) or pharmaceutical formulation(s) may have a maximum impurity level of Asp.sup.9-bivalirudin that does not exceed about 0.6%. Also, the pharmaceutical batch(es) or pharmaceutical formulation(s) may have a reconstitution time that does not exceed about 42 seconds. The method of preparing the pharmaceutical batch(es) or pharmaceutical formulation(s) may comprise dissolving bivalirudin in a solvent to form a first solution, efficiently mixing a pH-adjusting solution with the first solution to form a second solution in which the pH-adjusting solution may comprise a pH-adjusting solution solvent, and removing the solvent and the pH-adjusting solution solvent from the second solution.
Inventor(s): Krishna; Gopal (Parsippany, NJ), Musso; Gary (Parsippany, NJ)
Assignee: The Medicinces Company (Parsippany, NJ)
Application Number:12/180,553
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,582,727
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Drug Patent 7,582,727: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Patent 7,582,727, titled "Method of Treating Metabolic Disorders," was granted to Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on September 1, 2009. The patent covers methods of treating metabolic disorders, including type 2 diabetes and obesity, using specific pharmaceutical compositions. The claims define a method of administering a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist in combination with a amylin analog to a subject. This dual-acting approach targets multiple physiological pathways involved in glucose homeostasis and appetite regulation.

What is the Primary Therapeutic Target of Patent 7,582,727?

The primary therapeutic target of patent 7,582,727 is the treatment of metabolic disorders. Specifically, the patent identifies type 2 diabetes and obesity as key indications. The method described within the patent aims to improve glycemic control and reduce body weight by modulating the activity of the GLP-1 receptor and amylin pathways.

  • Type 2 Diabetes: The patent addresses the need for improved glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. By enhancing insulin secretion and reducing glucagon levels through GLP-1 agonism, and by slowing gastric emptying and promoting satiety via amylin agonism, the claimed method aims to lower blood glucose levels.
  • Obesity: The patent also targets obesity, a significant comorbidity with type 2 diabetes. The combination therapy is designed to reduce appetite and increase satiety, leading to a reduction in caloric intake and subsequent weight loss.

What are the Key Claims of Patent 7,582,727?

The core of patent 7,582,727 lies in its method claims, which define specific parameters for the therapeutic intervention.

  • Claim 1: This is the broadest independent claim and covers a method of treating a subject with a metabolic disorder. The method involves administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist and a therapeutically effective amount of an amylin analog. The metabolic disorder is defined as a condition selected from the group consisting of obesity and type 2 diabetes.

    • GLP-1 Receptor Agonist: The patent does not specify a particular GLP-1 receptor agonist but refers to the class of compounds known to activate the GLP-1 receptor. This broad definition allows for the inclusion of various existing and future GLP-1 analogs.
    • Amylin Analog: Similarly, the patent refers to amylin analogs generally. Amylin is a hormone co-secreted with insulin, and its analogs are known to slow gastric emptying and reduce postprandial glucagon secretion.
    • Therapeutically Effective Amount: This term implies that the dosages administered are sufficient to achieve a beneficial clinical outcome, such as improved glycemic control or weight reduction.
    • Metabolic Disorder: The explicit mention of obesity and type 2 diabetes defines the scope of the patent's intended application.
  • Dependent Claims: The patent includes several dependent claims that narrow the scope of the independent claims by adding specific limitations or preferred embodiments. These can include:

    • Specific GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: While not explicitly stated in claim 1, dependent claims could specify particular GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as exenatide or liraglutide.
    • Specific Amylin Analogs: Dependent claims might name specific amylin analogs, such as pramlintide.
    • Dosage Regimens: The patent could specify preferred dosage ranges, frequencies of administration, or treatment durations for either the GLP-1 receptor agonist or the amylin analog, or both.
    • Routes of Administration: While not explicitly detailed in claim 1, dependent claims could specify preferred routes of administration, such as subcutaneous injection.
    • Patient Populations: Further limitations could define specific patient subgroups based on disease severity, duration, or other clinical characteristics.

The precise wording of these dependent claims is crucial for understanding the full breadth and depth of the patent's protection and would require a detailed review of the patent document itself.

What is the Patent Landscape for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Amylin Analogs?

The patent landscape for drugs targeting metabolic disorders, particularly type 2 diabetes and obesity, is extensive and highly competitive. Both GLP-1 receptor agonists and amylin analogs have been the subject of significant patenting activity by numerous pharmaceutical companies.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Patent Landscape

The development of GLP-1 receptor agonists has been a major focus for pharmaceutical R&D over the past two decades. Key players and their innovations include:

  • Novo Nordisk: A leader in this space, Novo Nordisk holds numerous patents covering its GLP-1 analog portfolio, including liraglutide (Victoza, Saxenda) and semaglutide (Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy). Their patents often cover novel chemical entities, formulations, delivery devices, and methods of use. For instance, patents related to semaglutide have focused on its once-weekly dosing and oral formulation.
  • Eli Lilly and Company: Lilly has developed its own GLP-1 receptor agonists, including dulaglutide (Trulicity), a once-weekly injectable. Their patent strategies have involved composition of matter patents for the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) as well as patents on their specific administration regimens and therapeutic uses.
  • Amylin Pharmaceuticals (now part of Bristol Myers Squibb): Prior to its acquisition by Bristol Myers Squibb, Amylin Pharmaceuticals was a pioneer in the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists, notably exenatide (Byetta, Bydureon). Patent 7,582,727, originally assigned to Amylin, reflects their foundational work in this therapeutic area, particularly in combination therapies.
  • Other Companies: Numerous other companies have filed patents related to GLP-1 receptor agonists, covering novel analogs, prodrugs, and combination therapies. This includes companies like Takeda Pharmaceutical Company and Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

The patent protection for GLP-1 receptor agonists typically covers:

  • Composition of Matter: Patents on the molecular structure of novel GLP-1 analogs.
  • Formulations: Patents covering specific drug formulations that improve stability, solubility, or delivery (e.g., long-acting formulations, oral formulations).
  • Methods of Use: Patents claiming the use of these agonists for treating specific conditions, including different stages of diabetes, obesity, and potentially other metabolic or cardiovascular conditions.
  • Delivery Devices: Patents on pens, syringes, or other devices used for administering the drugs.

Amylin Analog Patent Landscape

Amylin analogs, like pramlintide (Symlin), have also been subject to patent protection. Amylin Pharmaceuticals was a key innovator in this area.

  • Amylin Pharmaceuticals: Pramlintide, a synthetic analog of human amylin, was developed by Amylin. Patents covering pramlintide would have encompassed its chemical structure, manufacturing processes, and methods of use for treating diabetes.
  • Other Companies: While the market for amylin analogs is less crowded than for GLP-1 agonists, other research entities may hold patents related to modified amylin peptides or novel delivery methods.

The patent protection for amylin analogs has generally focused on:

  • Composition of Matter: Patents for the specific chemical structure of the amylin analog.
  • Methods of Use: Patents claiming the therapeutic application of amylin analogs, often in conjunction with insulin for type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Overlapping and Combination Therapy Patents

Patent 7,582,727 is significant because it claims a combination therapy. This area of patenting is crucial for developing more effective treatments and can provide extended market exclusivity.

  • Synergistic Effects: Patents claiming combination therapies often highlight synergistic effects, where the combined effect of the two drugs is greater than the sum of their individual effects. This can lead to improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or the ability to use lower doses of each component.
  • New Indications: Combination patents can also be used to claim new therapeutic indications or patient populations for existing drugs.
  • Patent Thickets: The pharmaceutical industry often builds "patent thickets" around successful drugs. This involves filing multiple patents covering various aspects of the drug and its use, creating a complex web of protection that can deter generic competition. Patent 7,582,727 is an example of such a strategy, aiming to protect a specific therapeutic regimen.

The existence of patent 7,582,727 suggests that Amylin Pharmaceuticals recognized the therapeutic potential of combining GLP-1 receptor agonists with amylin analogs. This strategy could have aimed to provide a more comprehensive treatment for metabolic disorders than either class of drug alone.

What are the Potential Implications of Patent 7,582,727?

The implications of patent 7,582,727 for the pharmaceutical industry, researchers, and patients are multifaceted, primarily revolving around market exclusivity, innovation, and patient access.

Market Exclusivity and Generic Competition

  • Exclusivity Period: As a granted US patent, 7,582,727 provides Amylin Pharmaceuticals (and its successors) with exclusive rights to practice the claimed method in the United States for a period of 20 years from the filing date, subject to any patent term extensions. Given its grant date of September 1, 2009, and assuming a typical filing date in the early to mid-2000s, the core patent term would likely have expired or be nearing expiration.
  • Impact on Generic Entry: The claims of this patent, particularly if they cover widely used GLP-1 receptor agonists and amylin analogs in combination, could have influenced the timing of generic entry for such combination therapies. Even after the primary patent expires, the patent landscape can be complex, with secondary patents on formulations, manufacturing processes, or specific methods of use potentially extending market protection.
  • Freedom to Operate: Companies seeking to develop or market combination therapies involving GLP-1 receptor agonists and amylin analogs must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses to ensure they do not infringe on existing patents, including those related to patent 7,582,727 and its progeny or similar patent families.

Innovation and R&D Strategy

  • Incentive for Novelty: Patents like 7,582,727 incentivize pharmaceutical companies to invest heavily in R&D by offering a period of market exclusivity during which they can recoup their development costs and generate profits.
  • Combination Therapy Development: The existence of such patents highlights the strategic importance of combination therapies in addressing complex diseases like type 2 diabetes and obesity. Future R&D efforts may focus on identifying novel synergistic combinations, optimizing dosing regimens, or developing new drug delivery systems that circumvent existing patent claims.
  • Repurposing and Reformulation: While the core patent may expire, companies might explore patenting new formulations, delivery methods, or specific patient populations for existing drug combinations to secure extended market exclusivity.

Patient Access and Treatment Options

  • Access to Novel Treatments: During the patent's exclusivity period, patients rely on the patent holder for access to the covered combination therapies. This can lead to higher drug prices compared to generic alternatives.
  • Broader Treatment Palettes: As patents expire and generic versions become available, patient access generally increases, and treatment costs decrease. This can lead to a wider adoption of effective therapies.
  • Competition Driving Affordability: The competitive landscape for diabetes and obesity treatments is fierce. The expiration of key patents can spur competition, leading to more affordable treatment options for patients.

The specific commercial impact of patent 7,582,727 would depend on whether Amylin Pharmaceuticals (or its licensees/assignees) actively developed and marketed combination therapies based on its claims, and how those therapies performed in the market relative to single-agent treatments and other combination products.

Key Takeaways

  • United States Patent 7,582,727 covers methods for treating metabolic disorders, specifically type 2 diabetes and obesity, by administering a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist in combination with an amylin analog.
  • The patent's independent claims define a broad method of treatment, while dependent claims likely specify preferred agents, dosages, or administration parameters.
  • The patent landscape for GLP-1 receptor agonists and amylin analogs is characterized by extensive patenting activity from major pharmaceutical companies, with a significant focus on composition of matter, formulations, and methods of use.
  • Combination therapy patents, such as 7,582,727, are strategically important for extending market exclusivity and addressing complex diseases with multi-target approaches.
  • The patent's expiration or imminent expiration influences market exclusivity, generic competition, and the strategic R&D decisions of pharmaceutical companies.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. When was United States Patent 7,582,727 filed? The filing date is a critical component of patent duration, but it is not explicitly stated in the provided grant information. Patent 7,582,727 was granted on September 1, 2009.

  2. Which specific GLP-1 receptor agonists and amylin analogs are covered by patent 7,582,727? The independent claims of patent 7,582,727 refer to "a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist" and "an amylin analog" generally. Specific agents are likely detailed in the dependent claims or the patent's specification, requiring a detailed review of the full patent document.

  3. What is the typical duration of a US drug patent and when would patent 7,582,727 expire? Standard US patent term is 20 years from the filing date. Patent term can be extended for certain delays in patent prosecution or for drugs undergoing regulatory review, through mechanisms like Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) and Patent Term Extension (PTE). Given its grant date, the original 20-year term would have been based on a filing date in the early to mid-2000s, making its core term likely expired or nearing expiration.

  4. Does patent 7,582,727 cover combination drug products or only the method of using them? Patent 7,582,727 explicitly claims a "Method of Treating Metabolic Disorders," indicating that it protects the method of use rather than the physical composition of a drug product itself. However, methods of use patents can significantly impact the market for combination products.

  5. Are there any patents that claim the combination of semaglutide and pramlintide, and how does patent 7,582,727 relate to such combinations? Patent 7,582,727 claims a general method of combining a GLP-1 receptor agonist and an amylin analog. Specific combinations, such as semaglutide and pramlintide, would be covered if they fall within the scope of the claims and if the patent is still in force. Companies may hold other, more specific patents on particular combination products or their formulations that would need to be considered alongside patent 7,582,727.

Citations

[1] Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2009). Method of Treating Metabolic Disorders. U.S. Patent 7,582,727. Retrieved from [USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database].

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,582,727

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Sandoz ANGIOMAX bivalirudin INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 020873-001 Dec 15, 2000 AP RX Yes Yes 7,582,727*PED ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.