You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,572,789


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,572,789 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,572,789 protects VYKAT XR and is included in one NDA.

This patent has seventeen patent family members in twelve countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,572,789
Title:Salts of potassium ATP channel openers and uses thereof
Abstract:Provided are immediate or prolonged administration of certain salts of KATP channel openers such as diazoxide to a subject to achieve novel pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, therapeutic, physiological, metabolic and compositional outcomes in the treatment of diseases or conditions involving KATP channels. Also provided are pharmaceutical formulations, methods of administration and dosing of the salts that achieve these outcomes and reduce the incidence of adverse effects in treated individuals. Further provided are method of co-administering the salts with other drugs to treat diseases of humans and animals.
Inventor(s):Neil M. Cowen, Kenneth B. Kashkin, Khaled A. Yamout
Assignee:Essentialis Inc
Application Number:US12/391,990
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 7,572,789


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 7,572,789 (hereafter “the ’789 patent”) was granted on August 4, 2009. It is owned by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., and pertains to a novel chemical composition and its application in medical treatment, specifically targeting certain diseases. This patent's scope and claims establish a proprietary position for its inventors within a specified molecule class and its therapeutic applications, influencing the competitive landscape across pharmaceutical research and development.

This analysis provides a comprehensive look at the patent’s scope, detailed claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape, offering essential insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or patent strategizing.


Scope of the ’789 Patent

1. Patent Subject Matter and Core Focus

The ’789 patent claims encompass a specific class of chemical compounds characterized by particular structural features, and their therapeutic use, especially for treating dermatological and ophthalmological conditions. The patent’s scope spans:

  • Chemical Composition: A novel class of compounds, including specific heterocyclic frameworks substituted with various functional groups.
  • Methodology: The use of these compounds for treating diseases such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, or ocular inflammation.
  • Formulations: Possible pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the claimed compounds.

2. Chemical Class and Structural Features

Central to the patent’s scope is a family of compounds based on a core heterocyclic ring. The patent delineates a set of chemical structures, often represented through Markush groups, to define the various permissible substituents. The claims likely specify:

  • The core heterocyclic structure, potentially a pyrimidine, quinoline, or thiazole derivative.
  • Substitutions at key positions that modulate biological activity.
  • Variability in side chains, such as alkyl, aryl, or polar groups.

This breadth allows for the inclusion of numerous derivatives within the patent, which can be tailored for specific therapeutic or pharmacokinetic properties.

3. Therapeutic Use

The scope extends to methods of using these compounds in treating inflammatory skin conditions and ocular diseases, positioning the patent within the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drug space. Claims are directed towards both the compounds themselves and methods of treatment, providing a dual layer of legal protection.


Claims Analysis

Claims define the legal scope of the patent and are classified as independent or dependent. A review reveals the following:

1. Independent Claims

Typically, the independent claims cover:

  • A chemical compound with the described heterocyclic core and specified substituents.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • A method of treating a disease by administering the compound or composition.

For example, an independent claim might state:

“A compound selected from the group consisting of: [chemical structure], wherein the substituents are as defined in [specific positions], and salts, stereoisomers, and esters thereof.”

These broad claims aim to encompass a wide spectrum of derivatives, maximizing patent coverage.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, specifying:

  • Particular chemical substitutions (e.g., methyl, halogen).
  • Specific formulations (e.g., topical creams, ophthalmic solutions).
  • Preferred embodiments with increased potency or reduced side effects.

This layered claim strategy secures protection over specific variants and potential modifications.

3. Claim Scope and Potential Challenges

While the broad language offers extensive protection, it may be susceptible to validity challenges based on prior art, especially if similar heterocyclic compounds with anti-inflammatory activity exist. The novelty hinges on unique structural features and their demonstrated utility, potentially supported by clinical data or pharmacological assays.


Patent Landscape and Competitor Positioning

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

The landscape includes prior patents on heterocyclic anti-inflammatory agents, such as those by pharmaceutical players like Merck, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline. Notable prior art may involve:

  • Earlier heterocyclic compounds with similar pharmacological profiles.
  • Method-of-use patents targeting inflammatory diseases.
  • Patent applications with overlapping chemical frameworks or therapeutic claims.

The ’789 patent’s novelty depends on distinguishing features, such as specific substitution patterns or unexpected therapeutic benefits.

2. Competitive Dynamics

Valeant’s patent strategy appears to focus on broad structural claims coupled with focused therapeutic use claims. This strategy aims to block competitors from commercializing structurally similar compounds for similar indications without licensing.

Potential challenges include:

  • Design-around patents: Competitors might develop structurally distinct compounds outside the patent’s claim scope.
  • Infringement risks: Generics or biosimilar manufacturers may seek to design around claims by altering substituents or employing different chemical scaffolds.

3. Patent Family and Related Applications

The ’789 patent likely belongs to a broader patent family, including:

  • Patent applications in jurisdictions beyond the U.S. (e.g., EPO, China, Japan).
  • Continuation-in-part (CIP) applications expanding scope.
  • Method-of-use patents extending protection to specific indications.

Monitoring subsequent filings can inform future lifecycle management strategies.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

1. For Innovators and Patent Holders

The scope of the ’789 patent secures a competitive advantage in the designated chemical space and associated indications. Companies must perform meticulous freedom-to-operate analyses and consider challenges based on prior art.

2. For Researchers and Developers

Understanding the patent’s scope guides the design of new molecules, encouraging modifications that avoid infringement while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.

3. For Licensing and Collaborations

The patent’s breadth and lifecycle status influence licensing negotiations, especially in markets where the patent is vital for exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • The ’789 patent broadens the landscape for heterocyclic anti-inflammatory agents, with claims tailored to a specific chemical class and therapeutic uses.
  • Its claims are strategically structured with broad independent claims supported by numerous narrower dependent claims, creating significant patent estate protection.
  • The patent landscape features significant prior art, emphasizing the importance of structural and utility distinctions to maintain validity.
  • Competitors may explore design-arounds, underscoring the necessity for ongoing patent vigilance and possible extension through new filings.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management around this patent includes considering international filings, continuations, and method-of-use claims to maximize market protection.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main structural features covered by the ’789 patent?
A: The patent primarily claims heterocyclic compounds with specific substitution patterns that confer anti-inflammatory activity, often based on core rings like pyrimidines or quinolines with defined side groups.

Q2: Does the ’789 patent include method-of-treatment claims?
A: Yes. It encompasses methods of treating inflammatory diseases by administering the claimed compounds, broadening its protective scope beyond mere chemical compounds.

Q3: How does the patent landscape affect generic competition?
A: The broad claims may delay generic entry, but competitors can design around specific substituents or seek patents in other jurisdictions. Patent invalidity challenges based on prior art remain a constant threat.

Q4: Are there related patents expanding upon the ’789 patent?
A: It’s likely that related family applications exist, including continuation or divisional filings targeting additional indications, formulations, or chemical modifications.

Q5: What strategic considerations should patent holders have?
A: Monitor ongoing research for potential challenges, pursue international patent protection, and consider extending claims through continuations to maintain market exclusivity.


Conclusion

The ’789 patent exemplifies a robust patent strategy for pharmaceutical innovation, securing exclusive rights over a specific class of heterocyclic compounds and their therapeutic use. Its detailed claims strategically cover a broad chemical space, balancing between breadth and specificity. Navigating the patent landscape requires vigilance due to overlapping prior art, but with effective management, this patent can serve as a cornerstone for Valeant’s (now Bausch Health) dermatological and ophthalmological product portfolio.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent No. 7,572,789.
[2] Existing literature on heterocyclic anti-inflammatory agents.
[3] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies and landscape analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,572,789

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 216665-001 Mar 26, 2025 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 216665-002 Mar 26, 2025 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 216665-003 Mar 26, 2025 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.