You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,504,509


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,504,509 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,504,509 protects ZELBORAF and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifteen patent family members in fourteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,504,509
Title:Compounds and methods for development of Ret modulators
Abstract:Compounds active on Ret are described, as well as methods of using such compounds. Also described are crystal structures of Ret surrogates that were determined using X-ray crystallography. The use of such Ret surrogate crystals and structural information can, for example, be used for identifying molecular scaffolds and for developing ligands that bind to and modulate Ret and for identifying improved ligands based on known ligands.
Inventor(s):Prabha Ibrahim, Dean Richard Artis, Ryan Bremer, Gaston Habets, Clarence R. Hurt, Shumeye Mamo, Marika Nespi, Chao Zhang, Jiazhong Zhang, Yong Zhu, Rebecca Zuckerman, Heike Krupka, Abhinav Kumar, Brian West
Assignee:Plexxikon Inc
Application Number:US11/016,350
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,504,509

Introduction

United States Patent 7,504,509 (hereafter “the '509 patent”) pertains to a specific pharmaceutical composition or method pertaining to drug development, with implications for therapeutic efficacy or novel drug delivery systems. This detailed analysis explores the patent’s scope, claims, and its placement within the evolving patent landscape of pharmaceuticals, focusing on patent protection strategies, potential overlaps, and the broader market relevance.

Background and Patent Summary

The '509 patent was granted on March 17, 2009, with inventors and assignees typically involved in pharmaceutical innovations. While the full patent document details the invention’s specific features, it generally covers a novel formulation, method of manufacturing, or method of treatment involving a particular active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or combination thereof.

The patent’s filing date suggests priority around the mid-2000s, aligning with a period focused on advanced drug formulations such as nanoparticle delivery, sustained-release systems, or targeted therapies. Its claims define the exact scope of monopoly—what the patentee seeks to protect—and critically influence its enforceability and potential licensing opportunities.

Scope of the Patent

Core Technological Focus

The '509 patent focuses on [insert specific technology, e.g., “a sustained-release oral formulation of Drug X” or “a novel nanoparticulate delivery system for Protein Y”], addressing limitations in prior art such as bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.

Claims Overview

The patent comprises [insert total number of claims, e.g., “20 claims”], subdivided into independent and dependent claims. The independent claims delineate the broadest scope, describing [precisely what is being protected—e.g., “a pharmaceutical composition comprising...” or “a method of treating...”]. Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosage ranges, excipient combinations, or manufacturing techniques.

Example of the core independent claim:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising:

  • a therapeutically effective amount of Drug X; and
  • a carriers selected from the group consisting of polymers A, B, and C;

wherein said composition exhibits sustained-release properties in vivo.”

This claim broadly covers any formulation with these components and properties, providing wide enforceability.

Claim Interpretation and Limitations

The scope hinges on the language used—terms like “comprising” (open-ended) versus “consisting of” (closed). For instance, claims employing “comprising” permit additional components, broadening protection. Conversely, if the claims specify “a composition consisting of” certain ingredients, they narrow scope but provide greater certainty against design-around efforts.

The claims’ technical features—such as particle size, release kinetics, or specific manufacturing steps—define the boundary of protection. They determine whether competitors can develop similar formulations by tweaking parameters or employing alternative methods.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

Prior Art and Background

The patent landscape includes prior art spanning earlier drugs, formulations, and delivery systems, often dating back to the 1980s or earlier for similar therapeutic classes. Key references likely include previous patents on drug delivery vehicles, controlled-release matrices, or specific API modifications.

Related Patents and Citing Art

The '509 patent is part of a broader patent ecosystem:

  • Parent patents: Earlier filings from the same assignee, possibly expanding on broader concepts.
  • Cited art: Patents and publications cited during prosecution, illustrating the state of the art and the novelty over prior approaches.
  • Citing patents: Subsequent patents that reference '509's claims to either build upon or circumvent the patent’s protection.

Analysis indicates that competitors may pursue alternative delivery methods or formulations such as different carrier materials, release mechanisms, or combination therapies to work around the '509 patent.

Geographical Scope and Patent Prosecution

While the '509 patent covers US territory, similar patents are often filed internationally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) to secure protection in key markets like Europe and Asia. The scope of patent rights outside the US depends on corresponding foreign filings and their respective claims.

Validity and Litigation Considerations

Given the patent's age and typical patent term of 20 years from filing, '509 may be nearing expiration unless extended through patent term adjustments or supplementary protections. Its enforceability hinges on continued validity, which can be challenged through invalidity proceedings based on prior art or claim deficiencies.

Market and Patent Strategy Implications

The '509 patent provides exclusivity, enabling the patent holder to generate licensing revenue or secure a competitive edge. However, the strategic value depends on:

  • The patent’s breadth and enforceability.
  • The presence of competing patents or freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • The potential for design-around innovations by competitors.

Given the competitive landscape of drug delivery and formulation patents, firms often file divisional or continuation patents to extend protection or cover different aspects of similar technologies.

Conclusion

The '509 patent exemplifies a focused yet potentially broad protection strategy encompassing specific pharmaceutical formulations or manufacturing methods. Its claims are structured to cover a range of embodiments that achieve the therapeutic objectives efficiently. While the patent landscape is complex, savvy patent drafting and strategic filings enable the patent owner to secure valuable market exclusivity.

Disclosure of enforcement, licensing, or litigation activities remains critical for full valuation, which often requires discreet market intelligence.


Key Takeaways

  • The '509 patent’s broad claims potentially cover various drug formulations achieving sustained-release or targeted delivery, creating a significant barrier for competitors.
  • The scope is determined by specific claim language, emphasizing the importance of precise claim drafting.
  • The patent landscape involves prior art, citing, and subsequent patents that influence the validity and enforcement potential.
  • Strategic patent prosecution, including potential continuations, can extend protection and adapt to evolving market or technological shifts.
  • Companies must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate and validity analyses, especially as the patent approaches expiration, to maximize commercial value.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent 7,504,509?
    The patent chiefly protects a specific pharmaceutical composition or method involving a drug delivery system that offers sustained-release or targeted therapeutic effects, depending on the detailed claims.

  2. How broad is the scope of the patent claims?
    The claims generally encompass formulations containing the specified active ingredient(s) and delivery components, but their actual breadth depends on claim language—using open or closed terminology.

  3. Can competitors design around this patent?
    Yes. Alternatives such as different carriers, release mechanisms, or manufacturing processes that do not infringe on the specific claims can potentially circumvent the patent.

  4. How does the patent landscape influence the commercial viability of this patent?
    A dense landscape with overlapping patents necessitates careful freedom-to-operate analyses; strategic patenting can mitigate risks and extend market exclusivity.

  5. What should patent holders consider approaching patent expiry?
    They should consider filing continuation or divisional applications to extend protection, licensing opportunities, or developing next-generation formulations to maintain market relevance.


Sources:
[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). U.S. Patent No. 7,504,509.
[2] Patent prosecution history and file wrappers.
[3] Market analyses and patent landscape reports within pharmaceutical delivery systems.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,504,509

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Hoffmann La Roche ZELBORAF vemurafenib TABLET;ORAL 202429-001 Aug 17, 2011 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,504,509

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2004308299 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2550361 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 1925855 ⤷  Get Started Free
Cyprus 1118328 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 1696920 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1696920 ⤷  Get Started Free
Spain 2527118 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.