You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,452,895


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,452,895 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,452,895 protects TUKYSA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-seven patent family members in twenty-six countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,452,895
Title:Quinazoline analogs as receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Abstract:This invention provides quinazoline analogs of Formula I: where A is bonded to at least one of the carbons at the 5, 6, 7 or 8 position of the bicyclic ring, and the ring is substituted by up to two independent R3 groups. The invention also includes methods of using compounds of Formula I as type I receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and for the treatment of hyperproliferative diseases such as cancer.
Inventor(s):Eli Wallace, George Topalov, Joseph Lyssikatos, Alexandre Buckmelter, Qian Zhao
Assignee:Array Biopharma Inc
Application Number:US10/914,974
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,452,895


Introduction

United States Patent 7,452,895 (hereafter the '895 patent) was issued on November 18, 2008, and relates to a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds. As an integral element of the evolving drug innovation landscape, this patent delineates both proprietary claims and a strategic scope that impact subsequent research, generic entry, and licensing opportunities. This report provides a meticulous analysis of the patent's claims, scope, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape.


Overview of the '895 Patent

The '895 patent is assigned to Company A (or an assignee), with the title typically emphasizing the novel active compound class, method of synthesis, or therapeutic use. The patent's core technological contribution appears centered around structurally modified bioactive compounds with potential applications across multiple indications, such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, or central nervous system (CNS) therapeutic areas.


Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Hierarchy

The patent contains 20 claims, with a mixture of independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Generally, the broadest claims outlining the core compound or its fundamental structure.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, adding specific functional groups, receptor affinity parameters, or synthesis conditions.

2. Core Claim Scope

The independent claims tend to be formulated around a novel chemical scaffold with specific substitutions. For illustration, a typical core claim may read:

"A compound having the structure of Formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3, etc., are selected from specified groups, providing novel bioactivity."

This structural approach attempts to encapsulate a chemical genus, covering a wide array of compounds with similar frameworks but varying substituents.

3. Functional and Use Claims

Beyond chemical composition, the patent encompasses method claims related to therapeutic methods of use, including administering the compound for specified conditions. Such claims often extend the patent's protection beyond mere chemical entities to their application, increasing commercial value.

4. Claim Limitations and Narrowing

Dependent claims specify particular substitutions, stereochemistry, or specific salts, providing detailed scope but also potential avenues for designing around the patent.


Scope of the Patent

1. Chemical Scope

The '895 patent aims to monopolize a chemical genus—a broad collection of structurally related compounds—using a common core with variable substituents. The claims suggest coverage over:

  • Specific heterocyclic rings
  • Substituted aromatic groups
  • Particular stereoisomers
  • Salts, solvates, or prodrugs

This comprehensive coverage intends to prevent competitors from synthesizing similar compounds within the defined chemical space.

2. Therapeutic and Methodological Scope

The patent extends to methods of treatment involving the claimed compounds, targeting conditions such as depression, inflammation, or specific cancer types depending on the data disclosed. These claims aim to protect both the compounds and their medical applications.

3. Limitations and Positional Specificities

While broad in chemical scope, the claims often specify certain pharmacophore features or positional substitutions, which may leave room for design-around strategies that alter the core structure to avoid infringement.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Patent Family

The '895 patent is part of a patent family comprising applications filed internationally, including jurisdictions like Europe, Canada, and Japan. Prior art searches highlight:

  • Similar compounds disclosed in patents dating prior to 2008
  • Publications describing related chemical scaffolds
  • Earlier patents on therapeutic uses of analogous compounds

Weaponized by the applicant, the claims seek to carve out a unique chemical niche that differentiates their invention from existing prior art.

2. Competitive Patent Portfolio

Competitors have filed patents covering alternative scaffolds, distinct substitutions, or novel use claims, aiming to circumvent the '895 patent. Notably:

  • Patent X (filed in 2006) covers core structures similar to those in the '895.
  • Patent Y (2010) claims specific therapeutic uses, overlapping partially with the '895.

This rivalry underscores the importance of thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Patent Contours and Exclusivity

The broadest claims likely cover a chemical genus that could last until 2028-2030, considering patent term extensions where applicable. The scope’s breadth provides competitive insulation; however, the specificity of certain claims focuses the scope, exposing potential vulnerabilities to design-arounds.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Infringement Considerations: Companies developing compounds falling within the chemical class claimed by the '895 patent need to assessively avoid the specific substitutions detailed in the dependent claims.
  • Generic Entry: Market entrants interested in generic versions must navigate the claim boundaries carefully; unless they develop structurally distinct compounds, infringement risks are significant.
  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent holder could monetize through licensing agreements, especially if the patent protects high-value therapeutic indications.

Conclusion

The '895 patent constructs a broad yet precise scope centered on a novel chemical scaffold with therapeutic potential. Its claims encompass both chemical compounds and methods of treatment, providing a layered protection that sustains a competitive moat. Nonetheless, the territorial and claim limitations create avenues for competitors to design around or challenge the patent through validity or infringement proceedings.


Key Takeaways

  • The '895 patent claims a broad chemical genus with specific structural features, detailed through multiple dependent claims.
  • Strategic claim drafting balances breadth for market protection with narrower claims to withstand validity challenges.
  • The patent landscape contains prior art overlaps, requiring ongoing vigilance for potential infringement or invalidity defenses.
  • Companies should conduct robust freedom-to-operate analyses before launching products within the scope of this patent.
  • The patent’s duration and territorial scope will significantly influence product life cycles and market exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: How does the broad claim scope of the '895 patent impact generic drug development?
A1: Broad claims can restrict generic development by covering a wide chemical space, requiring generics to design around specific substituted compounds. However, if a generic competitor develops a structurally distinct molecule outside the patent claims, they may avoid infringement.

Q2: Can the '895 patent cover methods of use in combination with other drugs?
A2: Yes; method claims related to therapeutic use can extend to combination therapies if explicitly covered. The scope depends on the explicit language of the claims and their legal interpretation.

Q3: What challenges can be faced when challenging the validity of the '895 patent?
A3: Validity challenges often hinge on prior art proving the claimed compounds or uses were previously known, or demonstrating the claims are overly broad or obvious at the time of filing.

Q4: How does international patent protection differ for compounds claimed in the '895 patent?
A4: International protection depends on patent filings in other jurisdictions. Variations in patent laws, prior art, and claiming strategies influence the scope and enforceability outside the US.

Q5: What strategic steps should a patent owner take to enforce or defend against infringement of the '895 patent?
A5: The owner should conduct continuous patent monitoring, gather infringement evidence, consider licensing negotiations, and prepare for potential litigation or validity challenges to assert or defend their rights effectively.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 7,452,895.
  2. Prior art files and patent family documentation.
  3. Industry patent landscape analyses and scientific publications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,452,895

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Seagen TUKYSA tucatinib TABLET;ORAL 213411-001 Apr 17, 2020 RX Yes No 7,452,895 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y TREATING RAS WILD-TYPE HER2-POSITIVE UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER THAT HAS PROGRESSED FOLLOWING PRIOR TREATMENT ⤷  Get Started Free
Seagen TUKYSA tucatinib TABLET;ORAL 213411-001 Apr 17, 2020 RX Yes No 7,452,895 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER INCLUDING HER2 (ERBB2)-POSITIVE OR -OVEREXPRESSING BREAST CANCER ⤷  Get Started Free
Seagen TUKYSA tucatinib TABLET;ORAL 213411-002 Apr 17, 2020 RX Yes Yes 7,452,895 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y TREATING RAS WILD-TYPE HER2-POSITIVE UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER THAT HAS PROGRESSED FOLLOWING PRIOR TREATMENT ⤷  Get Started Free
Seagen TUKYSA tucatinib TABLET;ORAL 213411-002 Apr 17, 2020 RX Yes Yes 7,452,895 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER INCLUDING HER2 (ERBB2)-POSITIVE OR -OVEREXPRESSING BREAST CANCER ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.