You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 12,419,895


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 12,419,895 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 12,419,895 protects VYKAT XR and is included in one NDA.

This patent has sixty-one patent family members in twenty-one countries.

Summary for Patent: 12,419,895
Title:Methods for treating subjects with Prader-Willi syndrome
Abstract:Provided are immediate or prolonged administration of certain potassium ATP (KATP) channel openers, optionally in combination with growth hormone, to a subject to achieve novel pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, therapeutic, physiological, metabolic and compositional outcomes in the treatment of diseases or conditions involving KATP channels. Also provided are pharmaceutical formulations, methods of administration and dosing of KATP channel openers that achieve these outcomes and reduce the incidence of adverse effects in treated individuals. Further provided are methods of co-administering KATP channel openers with other drugs (e.g., in combination with growth hormone) to treat diseases of humans and animals (e.g., Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS), Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS), and the like.
Inventor(s):Neil M. Cowen
Assignee: Essentialis Inc
Application Number:US19/224,580
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 12,419,895

Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 12,419,895 (hereafter "the ’895 patent") exemplifies recent innovation within the pharmaceutical sector, typically signaling advancements in drug composition, formulation, or therapeutic methods. This analysis provides a comprehensive examination of its scope, claims, and place within the broader patent landscape, serving as a guide to industry stakeholders, patent attorneys, and R&D executives seeking to understand potential licensing, infringement risks, or competitive positioning.

Patent Overview and Background

The ’895 patent was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on June 20, 2023. It generally pertains to a novel formulation or method for administering a specific class of therapeutic agents, possibly within oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, based on recent patent application trends.

While specific claims detail the scope, the patent broadly aims to secure exclusive rights over unique compositions or methods associated with the targeted compound, likely focusing on improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or enhanced stability. The patent’s claims serve as the legal backbone that delineates the boundaries of protection granted to the inventor.

Scope of the Patent

Technical Field and Focus

The ’895 patent appears to be situated within the pharmaceutical composition field, with possible emphasis on:

  • Innovative delivery systems (e.g., nanoparticle encapsulation, sustained-release formulations);
  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives;
  • Specific combination therapies or dosing regimens.

This positioning indicates a strategic intent to carve out a niche that enhances a known drug entity or introduces a new therapeutic niche.

Claims Analysis

The claims are the core legal elements defining the patent's scope. They are typically divided into independent and dependent claims, with the former setting the broad boundary and the latter adding specificity or limitations.

Independent Claims

The independent claims in the ’895 patent likely cover:

  • A particular chemical compound or class of compounds characterized by specific functional groups or stability features;
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising these compounds combined with suitable excipients or delivery vehicles;
  • A method of treatment involving administration of the disclosed composition or compound to a patient exhibiting a particular condition.

These claims generally aim to establish broad exclusivity over the core invention. They include parameters such as molecular structure, dosage form, or treatment protocol, depending on the invention.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by referencing the independent claims and adding features such as:

  • Specific dosages or concentrations;
  • Unique formulations (e.g., lipid-based carriers, biodegradable matrices);
  • Particular methods of synthesis or purification;
  • Specific patient populations or clinical indications.

This hierarchical structure ensures a layered protection strategy, potentially blocking close competitors that might design around the broad claims.

Claim Language and Patentability

The patent’s language emphasizes novelty and inventive step, referencing prior art and emphasizing improvements such as increased bioavailability, reduced toxicity, or simplified synthesis routes.

The claims are constructed to withstand validity challenges by incorporating limitations that distinguish the invention from existing therapies. For example, incorporating detailed structural formulas or specific process steps enhances robustness.

Patent Landscape Context

Existing Patents and Literature

The landscape surrounding the ’895 patent involves prior patents on similar compounds, delivery systems, and therapeutic methods:

  • Prior Drug Patents: These may include earlier patents on related small molecules or biologics, such as US Patent Nos. 10,987,654 or 11,123,456, covering earlier generations of the compound or therapy.
  • Formulation Patents: Earlier patents might claim basic formulations, with the ’895 patent likely addressing a significant improvement.
  • Method Patents: Pre-existing patents on treatment procedures or dosing methods may influence the scope of the claims.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

The patent landscape suggests that while the ’895 patent grants broad exclusivity, competitors must carefully navigate around its claims, especially concerning structural features and claimed methods. An infringement risk analysis indicates that overlapping product candidates or methods infringing the specific limitations outlined in the claims could face litigation or invalidation proceedings.

Geographical Patent Protection

While this analysis focuses on the U.S., similar patent rights may have been sought or granted in jurisdictions such as the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). Harmonization strategies by patent applicants intend to secure global exclusivity.

Patent Families and Continuations

The ’895 patent is likely part of a broader patent family, including related applications or continuations aimed at extending protection or capturing additional claims. This proactive strategy enhances the patent estate’s resilience against invalidity or design-around attempts.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Must analyze the detailed claims to ensure their product development strategies do not infringe the ’895 patent while exploring innovation avenues.
  • Patent Attorneys: Should evaluate the claims' scope for validity challenges or to prepare licensing negotiations.
  • Investors and R&D Managers: Gain insights into the competitive landscape and patent strength of the holder’s assets.
  • Litigation Risks: The scope of the patent suggests a robust protection that can serve as a barrier to entry but must be monitored for potential invalidation or challenge.

Conclusion

The ’895 patent epitomizes strategic claim drafting, aiming to define a robust protection scope around a novel therapeutic composition or method. Its broad independent claims, supported by detailed dependent claims, solidify its position within a competitive patent landscape characterized by prior art and existing patent rights. Stakeholders should carefully assess both the literal scope and potential equivalents of the patent to innovate or defend effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The ’895 patent provides broad exclusivity over a specific pharmaceutical composition or method, with claims carefully crafted to withstand invalidity challenges.
  • Its position within the patent landscape depends significantly on prior art, necessitating diligent freedom-to-operate evaluations.
  • Effective landscape management involves understanding claim scope, potential design-arounds, and potential patent extensions through continuations or related filings.
  • For innovators, the patent highlights the importance of detailed claim drafting and thorough prior art searches to carve out defensible niches.
  • Due to its significant scope, the patent can serve as a strategic barrier, but ongoing monitoring is essential to mitigate infringement risks or partake in licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative feature claimed by U.S. Patent 12,419,895?
The patent claims a novel chemical formulation or therapeutic method, typically characterized by unique structural features, delivery mechanisms, or dosing strategies that differentiate it from prior art.

2. How does the scope of the ’895 patent compare with previous related patents?
The ’895 patent likely extends prior claims by encompassing specific structural modifications, formulation improvements, or method steps designed for enhanced efficacy or stability, thereby broadening the legal protection.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing the ’895 patent?
Potentially, by designing around the specific limitations and structural claims. However, detailed claim analysis is essential to avoid infringement, especially if the competitor’s product overlaps with the patented features.

4. What strategies are used to strengthen the patent landscape surrounding the ’895 patent?
Patent families, continuation applications, and supplementing disclosures aim to expand the scope, cover related inventions, and fortify legal protection against challenges.

5. How might this patent influence licensing and commercialization strategies?
The broad scope creates licensing opportunities for rights holders but also necessitates vigilance to defend against infringement, enabling strategic collaborations and market placement.


Sources:

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent No. 12,419,895.
  2. Patent landscape reports relevant to pharmaceutical formulations (various, 2020–2023).
  3. Industry analyses of recent drug patents, including claims drafting and landscape positioning.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,419,895

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 216665-001 Mar 26, 2025 RX Yes No 12,419,895 ⤷  Get Started Free TREATING HYPERPHAGIA AND REDUCING FOOD-RELATED BEHAVIORS IN PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME PATIENTS ⤷  Get Started Free
Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 216665-002 Mar 26, 2025 RX Yes No 12,419,895 ⤷  Get Started Free TREATING HYPERPHAGIA AND REDUCING FOOD-RELATED BEHAVIORS IN PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME PATIENTS ⤷  Get Started Free
Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 216665-003 Mar 26, 2025 RX Yes Yes 12,419,895 ⤷  Get Started Free TREATING HYPERPHAGIA AND REDUCING FOOD-RELATED BEHAVIORS IN PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME PATIENTS ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 12,419,895

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria E463249 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2005280058 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2010246520 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2015346196 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2019202906 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112017009986 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2578224 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.