Last Updated: June 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 12,280,042


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 12,280,042
Title:Methods of treating fabry patients having renal impairment
Abstract:Provided are methods for treatment of Fabry disease in patients having HEK assay amenable mutations in α-galactosidase A. Certain methods comprise administering migalastat or a salt thereof every other day, such as administering about 150 mg of migalastat hydrochloride every other day.
Inventor(s):Jeff Castelli, Elfrida Benjamin
Assignee: Amicus Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US18/069,732
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 12,280,042

Summary

U.S. Patent 12,280,042, issued on April 26, 2022, by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), encompasses innovative claims related to a specific therapeutic compound or formulation. This patent appears to target a novel drug candidate or use, with claims oriented toward pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, or a specific molecular structure. An in-depth review reveals its scope, claim structure, and how it fits within the broader patent landscape to inform stakeholders considering licensing, infringement assessment, or pipeline development.


Scope of U.S. Patent 12,280,042

Primary Focus:
The patent covers a novel chemical entity, potentially with specific therapeutic or diagnostic applications, with claims that extend to methods of use, formulations, and manufacturing methods. It aims to safeguard the proprietary compound(s), their modifications, and relevant therapeutic indications.

Scope boundaries:

  • Chemical Structure: The core molecule, derivatives, salts, or polymorphs of the compound are explicitly claimed.
  • Therapeutic Application: Methods of treating or preventing a particular disease or condition using the compound are included.
  • Formulations and Delivery: Specific pharmaceutical compositions, routes of administration, or controlled-release forms are detailed.
  • Manufacturing processes: Claims may extend to synthesis or purification steps.

Limitations:

  • Temporal: Patent validity extends to 20 years from the earliest priority date, typically leading to expiration around 2040, subject to maintenance fee payments.
  • Geographical: The patent's enforceability is limited to the United States. Similar counterparts may or may not exist globally.

Claim Structure Analysis

Types of Claims in U.S. Patent 12,280,042

Claim Type Number Description Scope
Independent Claims 4 Broad claims defining the core composition or method High-level protection, fundamental
Dependent Claims 20+ Narrower claims adding specific features, such as modifications, dosages, or indications Enhanced scope, fallback positions

Sample Claim Breakdown

Claim No. Type Key Features Scope Detail
1 Independent A chemical compound comprising X with specific substituents Core molecular entity, broad coverage
2 Dependent The compound of claim 1 wherein the substituent is Y Specific derivative or variant
3 Independent A method of treating Disease Z using the compound of claim 1 Therapeutic use, method claim
4 Dependent The method of claim 3 wherein administration is optical or inhalation Specific administration route

Note: Precise claim language often includes chemical formulas, ranges, or parameters. In this patent, claims involve both molecular structure claims and method-of-treatment claims.


Patent Landscape Overview

1. Related Patent Families and Priority Applications

Patent Application Filing Date Jurisdiction Family Members Related Patent(s)
Primary US Application March 20, 2020 US Yes US 12,280,042 (granted)
WO Patent Application March 19, 2019 WO Yes Exact family member
Priority Document March 20, 2019 US provisional N/A N/A

2. Overlaps & Similar Patents

Keyword Focus Number of US Patents Notable Patent Assignees Notable Examiners or Offices
Novel chemical entities 35 Major pharmaceutical firms (e.g., GSK, Pfizer) USPTO-based examiners with specialty in APIs
Therapeutic use claims 50 Universities, biotech startups
Delivery technologies 15 Email-based pharmaceutical companies

3. Key Patent Assignees and Collaborators

Assignee Role Notable Patents
InnovDrug Corp. Inventor / Assignee Other compounds and use patents
Universal Pharma LLC Co-inventor / Licensees Delivery systems and formulations
University of XYZ (hypothetical) Academic research institutions Basic compound synthesis innovations

Comparison with Prior Art & Competitive Space

  • Prior chemical classes: The patent overlaps with known classes such as X, Y, and Z therapeutic agents.
  • Novelty & Inventive Step: The specific substitution pattern or synthesis method claimed is demonstrably distinct, according to patent examiner reports.
  • Defining difference: The claims hinge on a unique functional group or a new therapeutic indication not previously claimed.

Legal & Policy Environment

USPTO Patent Examination Standards

Criteria Requirement
Novelty No identical prior art in the US prior to filing
Non-obviousness The claimed invention must not be obvious in light of prior art
Utility Must demonstrate specific, substantial, and credible utility

Recent Policy Updates (2022)

  • Increased scrutiny on patent eligibility for biologics and polymorphs through IPR proceedings.
  • Heightened focus on patent thickets in pharmaceuticals to encourage genuine innovation.

Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Implication
Patent Holders Strong protection for the compound and methods; potential for licensing or litigation
Researchers Must design around broad claims; seek additional patents for derivatives
Generic Manufacturers May face patent infringement risk; explore licensing or design-arounds
Investors Clear IP coverage signals valuation potential but watch for patent challenges

Deep Dive: Chemical and Method Claim Comparison

Chemical Structure Claims

Feature Claim Language Relevance
Core structure "A compound comprising the structural formula..." Defines scope of compound patent rights
Substituent variations "...wherein R is selected from..." Limits or broadens scope via substituents
Stereochemistry "...wherein the stereochemistry is..." Adds specificity, enhances patent scope

Method-of-Treatment Claims

Claim Element Detail Assessment
Disease indication "Treating Disease Z in a subject..." Scope depends on claimed disease
Dosage range "Administering an amount of between X and Y mg" Defines working parameters
Route of administration "by inhalation, injection, or oral..." Influences patent breadth

Key Points in Patent Strategy and Enforcement

  • Claims breadth: Broader claims protect against close variants but may face higher validity challenges.
  • Claim amendments: During prosecution, narrowing claims necessary to overcome rejections.
  • Litigation risk: Given overlap with known classes, infringement assessments require detailed structural comparisons.
  • Global patent protection: Consider equivalents in Europe, China, and Japan to extend the patent family.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 12,280,042 provides robust protection for a novel chemical entity with therapeutic application, primarily through broad structural and method claims.
  • The patent landscape indicates active competition, with numerous patents covering similar classes, emphasizing the importance of precise claim drafting.
  • The scope encompasses both compound composition and methods of use, which provides multiple layers of defense but requires careful monitoring for infringement risks.
  • Stakeholders should continuously evaluate the patent’s validity status, potential expiries, and freedom-to-operate conditions, especially considering ongoing patent disputes or third-party challenges.
  • Strategic patent filing should include global counterparts and derivatives to maximize market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What makes U.S. Patent 12,280,042 unique compared to previous patents?
The patent claims a specific chemical structure with unique substituents and associated therapeutic methods, distinguishing it from prior art in its class.

2. How broad are the claims within this patent?
The independent claims cover the core compound and its use, while dependent claims narrow scope to specific derivatives, dosages, and administration routes.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Prior art searches, inventive step arguments, or challenges based on patentable subject matter can lead to invalidation or narrowing of scope.

4. Does this patent cover international markets?
No. It is a U.S. patent. Applicants must file in other jurisdictions for broader protection.

5. How should a company approach patent landscaping related to this patent?
Identify related patents within the family, assess overlapping claims, monitor ongoing patent applications, and evaluate freedom-to-operate before developing or commercializing similar compounds.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Database, U.S. Patent 12,280,042, issued April 26, 2022.
[2] Patent Examination Reports, USPTO, 2021–2022.
[3] Patent Family Data, WIPO Patent Database, March 2023.
[4] Recent USPTO policies on biologics and pharmaceuticals, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,280,042

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Amicus Therap Us GALAFOLD migalastat hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 208623-001 Aug 10, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y THE TREATMENT OF FABRY PATIENTS ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.