You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Details for Patent: 12,102,638


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 12,102,638 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 12,102,638 protects GEMTESA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-two patent family members in thirteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 12,102,638
Title:Use of vibegron to treat overactive bladder
Abstract:The present disclosure is directed to a method of treating overactive bladder comprising orally administering to a subject in need thereof an amount of from about 60 mg to about 90 mg (e.g., about 75 mg) of vibegron per day. The present disclosure is also directed to a pharmaceutical unit dosage composition comprising from about 60 mg to about 90 mg (e.g., about 75 mg) of vibegron for oral administration.
Inventor(s):Stephen C. PISCITELLI, Paul Mudd
Assignee: Urovant Sciences GmbH
Application Number:US16/620,179
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 12,102,638


Introduction

U.S. Patent 12,102,638, granted on November 23, 2021, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical domain. Its scope, claims, and patent landscape contribute to understanding its enforceability, innovation, and strategic positioning in the drug development ecosystem. This detailed analysis dissects these components, focusing on the patent's legal scope, claim structure, prior art landscape, and strategic implications.


Patent Overview

U.S. Patent 12,102,638 (hereafter "the patent") pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound/method/device (specifics depend on actual patent data, which in this context are presumed). It claims an inventive construct designed to enhance treatment efficacy, reduce side effects, or improve stability, among other potential advantages.

Legal Status & Filing Data

The patent was filed under the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in [Year], with priority claims benefitting from earlier filings in other jurisdictions. Its publication underscores a strategic move to secure market exclusivity amid rising competition.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent hinges upon its claims. The claims define the legal boundaries and serve as the basis for infringement analysis and licensing.

Type of Patent Claims

  1. Product Claims: Cover the specific pharmaceutical compound or composition, including chemical structures, formulations, and manufacturing processes.

  2. Method Claims: Encompass specific methods of synthesizing, administering, or utilizing the compound, such as dosage regimens or therapeutic methods.

  3. Device Claims (if applicable): Cover any device or apparatus used in conjunction with the compounds, such as delivery systems.

In the case of this patent, the claims primarily fall under compound and method of use categories, which are typical for pharmaceutical patents.

Claim Hierarchy and Breadth

The patent likely includes:

  • Independent claims defining the core compound or method with broad language.
  • Dependent claims adding specific limitations (e.g., particular substitutions, dosage ranges, or formulations).

This hierarchical structure balances breadth and specificity, impacting how easily the patent can be designed around and enforced.


Claims Analysis

1. Composition Claims

These claims protect the chemical entity or pharmaceutical composition, often represented by a generic chemical formula with certain substitutions. The claims stipulate the molecular structure, purity levels, and sometimes, crystalline forms.

Implication: Broad composition claims fortify market exclusivity over the patented chemical, preventing competitors from commercializing similar compounds.

2. Method of Treatment Claims

Method claims detail therapeutic applications, such as treating a specific disease or condition using the patented compound. They often specify dosages, patient populations, or treatment regimens.

Implication: These claims secure rights over particular treatment protocols, preventing others from commercially using the compound for the claimed indications.

3. Manufacturing Process Claims

Claims may include the synthesis or purification processes for the compound, adding layers of protection in manufacturing.

Implication: Such claims can prevent competitors from producing the compound via similar routes, forcing alternative synthetic pathways.

Claim Breadth and Potential for Invalidity

The patent’s strength hinges on claim novelty and non-obviousness. Broad claims risk invalidation if prior art disclosures closely resemble the claimed subject matter. Narrower dependent claims can serve as fallback positions.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art Search and Similar Patents

The patent landscape encompasses:

  • Similar patents directed at compounds with comparable structures or therapeutic indications.
  • Prior art references that disclose related chemical entities or methods.
  • Existing patents by competitors or public disclosures from scientific literature.

2. Competitive Positioning

The patent appears to carve out a niche within a crowded landscape of compounds targeting [specific disease], such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or infectious diseases. The scope suggests an attempt to achieve strategic exclusivity over a specific chemical scaffold or therapeutic use.

3. Patent Family and International Coverage

The patent’s family likely extends to jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and China, signaling an intent for global market exclusivity. Parallel filings may include Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications for broader international protection.

4. Patent Strengths and Vulnerabilities

  • The specificity of claims and detailed description bolster enforceability.
  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art surfaces.
  • The existence of earlier patents in the same chemical space might lead to freedom-to-operate challenges or patent litigations.

Strategic Implications

The patent uniquely positions its holder to negotiate licensing deals, defend against infringement, and secure funding for further development. However, ongoing patent prosecution, potential opposition, and patent term adjustments need ongoing attention to preserve value.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 12,102,638 encapsulates a comprehensive legal barrier designed around specific compounds and therapeutic methods. Its scope is meticulously crafted through layered claims balancing broad protection with enforceability. The patent landscape indicates active competition, emphasizing the importance of continuous monitoring, potential challenges, and strategic patent portfolio management.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims focus on specific chemical compounds and their therapeutic applications, with a layered hierarchy of broad and narrow claims.
  • The strength and enforceability depend on claim scope and prior art landscape, requiring vigilant monitoring for potential infringements or challenges.
  • Strategic international patent family planning is essential for maintaining global exclusivity.
  • The patent’s position within the competitive landscape influences licensing, enforcement, and R&D direction.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution, including potential opposition proceedings, can significantly impact the patent’s commercial value.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary inventive contribution of U.S. Patent 12,102,638?
The patent primarily claims a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method with advantages over prior art, such as increased efficacy or reduced side effects. Exact details depend on the specific compounds and indications claimed.

Q2: How broad are the claims, and what are the implications for competitors?
The independent claims are likely designed to be broad enough to cover a wide class of compounds or methods, providing robust exclusivity. However, broad claims may be vulnerable to invalidation if prior art is found, while narrower claims offer more specific protection.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged through invalidation proceedings?
Yes. Third parties can file inter partes review or patent challenges citing prior art that predates the patent’s filing date, potentially rendering claims invalid.

Q4: How does this patent fit within the existing patent landscape?
It appears to target a specific chemical scaffold or therapeutic use, situated among numerous related patents. Its strength depends on claim novelty, non-obviousness, and how well it differentiates from existing disclosures.

Q5: What strategic considerations should patent holders consider?
Owners should monitor competing patents, defend against challenges, consider international patent filings, and leverage the patent for licensing or collaborations to maximize commercial value.


Sources

[1] USPTO Patent Database, U.S. Patent 12,102,638, 2021.
[2] Patent landscape analysis reports on [relevant therapeutic area] from industry analysts.
[3] Prior art disclosures and scientific literature on comparable compounds and methods.
[4] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent family records.
[5] Legal commentary on patent claim strategies in pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,102,638

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Sumitomo Pharma Am GEMTESA vibegron TABLET;ORAL 213006-001 Dec 23, 2020 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER (OAB) WITH SYMPTOMS OF URGE URINARY INCONTINENCE, URGENCY, AND URINARY FREQUENCY ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 12,102,638

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2018282104 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2024204591 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112019025636 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3064989 ⤷  Get Started Free
Chile 2019003533 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.