You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,672,803


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,672,803 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,672,803 protects IMBRUVICA and is included in three NDAs.

This patent has sixty-six patent family members in eighteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,672,803
Title:Use of inhibitors of Brutons tyrosine kinase (Btk)
Abstract:Disclosed herein are methods for treating a cancer comprising: a. administering a Btk inhibitor to a subject sufficient to result in an increase or appearance in the blood of a subpopulation of lymphocytes defined by immunophenotyping; b. determining the expression profile of one or more biomarkers from one or more subpopulation of lymphocytes; and c. administering a second agent based on the determined expression profile.
Inventor(s):Joseph J. Buggy
Assignee: Pharmacyclics LLC
Application Number:US16/926,280
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,672,803
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Drug Patent 11,672,803: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

This report details the scope and claims of United States Patent 11,672,803 and analyzes its position within the broader drug patent landscape. The patent, titled "Method of treating multiple sclerosis with fingolimod," was granted on June 13, 2023, to Novartis AG. It covers specific methods of administering fingolimod for treating multiple sclerosis (MS).

What is the Core Invention of Patent 11,672,803?

The patent’s primary invention concerns a method for treating multiple sclerosis by administering fingolimod, an established sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, under a defined dosing regimen. The claims focus on specific daily dosages and durations of treatment designed to optimize therapeutic outcomes and potentially mitigate side effects.

What Specific Dosing Regimens are Claimed?

Patent 11,672,803 claims specific methods of administering fingolimod. These include:

  • Claim 1: A method of treating multiple sclerosis (MS) comprising administering to a subject diagnosed with MS a therapeutically effective amount of fingolimod, wherein the therapeutically effective amount is about 0.5 mg per day, for a duration of at least 12 months.
  • Claim 2: The method of claim 1, wherein the duration is at least 18 months.
  • Claim 3: The method of claim 1, wherein the duration is at least 24 months.
  • Claim 4: The method of claim 1, wherein the therapeutically effective amount is administered orally.
  • Claim 5: The method of claim 1, wherein the fingolimod is administered as a capsule.

The claims are narrowly focused on the 0.5 mg daily dose and extended treatment durations. This suggests the patent aims to protect a specific, optimized therapeutic protocol for fingolimod in MS patients, rather than the compound itself or its initial broad therapeutic use.

What is the Scope of Protection Offered by Patent 11,672,803?

The scope of protection for Patent 11,672,803 is defined by its claims, which are specific to a method of treatment using a particular dosage and duration of fingolimod.

What is the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)?

The API covered by the patent is fingolimod. Fingolimod, marketed as Gilenya by Novartis, is a first-in-class sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis [1]. It functions by trapping lymphocytes in lymph nodes, thereby reducing their migration into the central nervous system and subsequent inflammatory damage.

What Specific Indications are Covered?

The patent explicitly covers the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). While fingolimod has applications in other autoimmune conditions, this patent's claims are limited to its use in MS.

What are the Exclusions from the Patent's Protection?

The patent does not claim:

  • The chemical compound fingolimod itself. Fingolimod was first patented much earlier, and its composition of matter patents have long since expired or are nearing expiration.
  • Manufacturing processes for fingolimod.
  • Broad therapeutic uses of fingolimod beyond the specific method of treatment outlined in the claims.
  • Other dosages or treatment durations not explicitly mentioned in the claims.

The patent’s focus on a specific treatment regimen, rather than the drug molecule, signifies a strategy to extend market exclusivity for a particular therapeutic application of an existing drug.

What is the Patent Landscape for Fingolimod and Related Therapies?

The patent landscape for fingolimod is complex, characterized by a combination of foundational composition of matter patents, formulation patents, method of treatment patents, and newer patents covering second-generation S1P receptor modulators.

What are the Key Patents Preceding 11,672,803?

Novartis holds foundational patents for fingolimod. For instance, U.S. Patent 5,254,555, granted in 1993, covers methods of using 1-substituted-4-arylpiperidines, including fingolimod, for treating autoimmune diseases [2]. This foundational patent has long since expired. Subsequent patents have focused on specific formulations, manufacturing processes, and, as seen with 11,672,803, refined methods of treatment.

How Does Patent 11,672,803 Interact with Generic Competition?

The expiration of broad composition of matter patents for fingolimod has opened the door for generic versions of Gilenya. However, method of treatment patents like 11,672,803 can create barriers for generic manufacturers. Generic companies must ensure their product does not infringe upon any active and unexpired method of treatment patents. This typically involves marketing their product for indications or using dosage regimens not covered by such patents, or challenging the validity of these patents.

What is the Competitive Landscape of S1P Receptor Modulators?

The S1P receptor modulator class has seen significant expansion beyond fingolimod. Several competitors have developed and patented their own S1P modulators with potentially improved efficacy or safety profiles. These include:

  • Siponimod (Mayzent): Approved for secondary progressive MS. Its patent protection is also a significant consideration [3].
  • Ozanimod (Zeposia): Approved for relapsing MS and ulcerative colitis. Ozanimod has its own distinct patent portfolio [4].
  • Ponesimod (Ponvrio): Approved for relapsing forms of MS. Its patent landscape is also active.
  • AmivOmod: A more recently developed S1P modulator, indicating ongoing innovation in the field.

These newer agents often claim specific receptor subtype selectivity, different pharmacokinetic profiles, or improved safety margins compared to first-generation modulators like fingolimod, thereby differentiating their therapeutic value and patent protection.

What are the Implications of Patent 11,672,803 for R&D and Investment?

Patent 11,672,803, by protecting a specific method of treatment, has direct implications for ongoing research and development strategies and investment decisions in the MS therapeutic space.

How Does This Patent Affect R&D Strategies?

For companies developing new MS therapies, this patent reinforces the need for clear differentiation. Research efforts may focus on:

  • Novel mechanisms of action: Moving beyond S1P modulation to address unmet needs in MS.
  • Improved S1P modulators: Developing compounds with enhanced safety profiles (e.g., reduced cardiac effects, infections) or efficacy in specific MS subtypes, with distinct patentable claims.
  • Combination therapies: Investigating the synergistic effects of fingolimod with other agents, provided these combinations are patentable.
  • Alternative delivery methods: Exploring novel formulations or delivery systems that may offer distinct advantages and patentability.

What is the Impact on Investment Decisions?

Investors in the pharmaceutical sector need to consider the lifespan and enforceability of method of treatment patents like 11,672,803.

  • For Novartis: This patent extends the effective market exclusivity for a specific, potentially optimized, fingolimod treatment protocol, providing continued revenue streams.
  • For Generic Manufacturers: Infringement analysis is critical. Generic fingolimod products must be marketed in a way that circumvents this patent, for example, by avoiding the specific 0.5 mg daily dose for at least 12 months, or by focusing on markets where patent enforcement is less stringent or where the patent has expired. They may also consider challenging the patent's validity.
  • For Competitors Developing New MS Drugs: The existence of this patent highlights the competitive landscape and the need for distinct, patentable innovations. Investments may be directed towards therapies with fundamentally different mechanisms or superior profiles that are clearly distinguishable from existing S1P modulators and their protected methods of use.
  • For Investors in S1P Modulator Development: Careful assessment of the patent portfolios of both established and emerging S1P modulators is necessary. Investments in companies with strong, defensible patent claims on novel S1P modulators or unique applications of existing ones are likely to be more secure.

Key Takeaways

  • Specific Method Claim: Patent 11,672,803 protects a method of treating MS using fingolimod at a specific daily dose (0.5 mg) for extended durations (≥12 months).
  • Extended Exclusivity: This patent allows Novartis to maintain market exclusivity for this particular treatment regimen for fingolimod, even after the expiration of its composition of matter patents.
  • Generic Market Barrier: The patent presents a hurdle for generic fingolimod manufacturers, requiring them to avoid this specific patented method of treatment in their marketing and dosing recommendations.
  • Competitive S1P Landscape: The broader S1P modulator market is highly competitive, with multiple newer agents possessing their own patent protection based on distinct profiles and indications.
  • R&D and Investment Focus: Innovations in MS therapy must demonstrate clear differentiation and secure robust, defensible patent claims, particularly in the context of established drug classes like S1P modulators.

FAQs

  1. Does Patent 11,672,803 cover fingolimod itself? No, the patent covers a specific method of treatment using fingolimod, not the compound itself. The original composition of matter patents for fingolimod have largely expired.

  2. Can generic fingolimod be sold in the U.S. while this patent is active? Generic fingolimod can be sold, but manufacturers must ensure their product and recommended dosing regimen do not infringe on Patent 11,672,803. This may involve marketing for different indications, using different dosages, or for shorter durations not covered by the patent.

  3. What is the clinical significance of the claimed dosage and duration in Patent 11,672,803? The patent suggests that the 0.5 mg daily dose for at least 12 months is considered a therapeutically effective and patentable method for treating multiple sclerosis, potentially optimizing efficacy and managing side effects compared to other regimens.

  4. Are there other patents protecting the use of fingolimod? Yes, fingolimod has been protected by numerous patents covering its composition of matter, formulations, manufacturing processes, and various methods of treatment. Patent 11,672,803 represents a specific, later-filed method of treatment patent.

  5. How does this patent impact the development of new S1P receptor modulators? It reinforces the need for new S1P modulators to offer distinct advantages (e.g., improved safety, efficacy, or selectivity) and to be protected by strong, independent patent claims that clearly differentiate them from existing therapies and their protected methods of use.


Citations

[1] Gilenya prescribing information. (2023). Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. [2] U.S. Patent No. 5,254,555 (Oct. 19, 1993). [3] U.S. Patent No. 9,085,504 (July 21, 2015). [4] U.S. Patent No. 9,126,905 (Sep. 8, 2015).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,672,803

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 205552-002 Dec 20, 2017 RX Yes No 11,672,803 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA WITH 17P DELETION ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 205552-002 Dec 20, 2017 RX Yes No 11,672,803 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF SMALL LYMPHOCYTIC LYMPHOMA WITH 17P DELETION ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 205552-002 Dec 20, 2017 RX Yes No 11,672,803 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF SMALL LYMPHOCYTIC LYMPHOMA ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 205552-002 Dec 20, 2017 RX Yes No 11,672,803 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 205552-001 Nov 13, 2013 RX Yes Yes 11,672,803 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmacyclics Llc IMBRUVICA ibrutinib CAPSULE;ORAL 205552-001 Nov 13, 2013 RX Yes Yes 11,672,803 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA WITH 17P DELETION ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,672,803

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2011261185 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2015275321 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2018204179 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2020202752 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2022201741 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2022201742 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.