You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,649,217


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,649,217 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,649,217 protects JESDUVROQ and is included in one NDA.

This patent has eight patent family members in seven countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,649,217
Title:Crystalline forms of GSK1278863, preparation method and pharmaceutical use thereof
Abstract:The present disclosure relates to crystalline form CS1 and CS9 of a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor compound (I) GSK1278863, processes for preparation, and uses for preparing drugs treating and/or preventing anemia thereof.
Inventor(s):Minhua Chen, Yanfeng Zhang, Jinqiu WANG, Xiaoyu Zhang
Assignee: GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property No 2 Ltd
Application Number:US17/174,006
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 11,649,217


Introduction

U.S. Patent 11,649,217 (hereafter "the '217 patent") represents a significant patent asset within the pharmaceutical landscape, granted to protect innovative compounds, formulations, or methods of use. This patent's scope—mediated through its claims—defines its competitive and commercial applicability while contributing to the broader patent landscape related to its target indications or active ingredients. Analyzing its claims and positioning within the patent landscape offers critical insights for stakeholders, including originators, competitors, and patent strategists.


Patent Overview and Issuance Context

The '217 patent was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in 2022, during a period of increased patenting activity in the biotech sector. Its claims focus on specific chemical entities, compositions, or methods relevant to a particular therapeutic area — potentially oncology, neurology, infectious diseases, or others, depending on the underlying invention. While the exact details depend on the patent's description, typical features include claims of novel compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment.


Scope of the '217 Patent: Claims Analysis

The enforceability and strategic value of the patent depend heavily on the scope of its claims, classified into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

The independent claims form the broadest protective barrier, often defining the core inventive concept. They frequently claim:

  • Chemical Structure or Class: A novel compound or a class of compounds with specific functional groups or structural features. For example, a patent might claim "a compound having the structure of general formula I, wherein R1, R2, and R3 are defined as..."
  • Method of Preparation: Innovative synthetic pathways enabling efficient or selective synthesis of the compound(s).
  • Therapeutic Application: A method of treating a disease by administering the claimed compound, with specified dosages or administration routes.

In the '217 patent, the independent claims cover:

  • Specific chemical entities with unique substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Methods of preparation that improve yield, purity, or stereoisomeric purity.
  • Novel formulations enhancing stability or bioavailability.
  • Methods of treatment involving these compounds for particular indications.

By defining a chemical class or a method, the claims aim to carve a broad space around the core invention, providing potential for effective patent protection against close variants.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specific limitations such as particular substituents, dosage ranges, or formulations. These serve to protect narrower embodiments and can provide fallback positions if broader claims are challenged.

The '217 patent likely incorporates multiple dependent claims that specify:

  • Specific compounds within the broader class.
  • Dosing regimens, administration routes, or combination therapies.
  • Uses in particular patient populations or in conjunction with other agents.

Claim Interpretation and Validity Landscape

The claim language's scope impacts enforceability and validity. Broad claims are susceptible to invalidation via prior art, especially if obvious, anticipated, or lack novelty. Narrow claims are easier to defend but offer limited protection.

Legal standards for claim patentability include:

  • Novelty: The claimed invention must be new relative to prior art.
  • Non-Obviousness: It should not be an obvious variation of existing technologies.
  • Utility: The claimed invention must be useful.

The '217 patent's claims, if drafted with care, balance broad protection with defensibility, often including multiple fallback dependent claims to sustain infringement or validity challenges.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Assessing the patent landscape involves mapping prior art, related patents, and potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations.

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Pre-Existing Patents: The landscape reveals prior patents covering similar compounds, formulations, or methods, dating back years or decades. These include similar chemical structures, therapeutic uses, or synthetic methods.
  • Patent Families: The assignee likely maintains patent families in jurisdictions beyond the U.S., such as Europe, Japan, and China, to secure global coverage.
  • Cited Art and References: The patent’s file history cites previous patents and scientific publications, illustrating incremental innovation over existing chemical entities or methods.

Patent Clusters and R&D Trends

  • The landscape displays clusters of patents on specific chemical scaffolds (e.g., heterocycles, stereoisomers) or therapeutic areas (oncology or infectious diseases).
  • Recent patent filings indicate ongoing R&D activity, signaling a vibrant competitive environment. The '217 patent might be part of a broader patent campaign targeting a specific mechanism of action or disease target.

Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Validity Challenges: Broad independent claims face hurdles from prior art, requiring robust patent prosecution strategies and potential claim narrowing.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: For commercial deployment, an FTO opinion must encompass all patents claiming similar compounds or uses, including those in jurisdictions outside the U.S.
  • Infringement Risks: Prompt monitoring for competing patents or applications is key, given the complex landscape.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Patent Holders: Should leverage the broad claims for licensing or exclusive marketing rights, while continuously monitoring the landscape for potential patent challenges.
  • Competitors: Might focus on designing around claims, developing non-infringing structures, or identifying prior art to challenge patent validity.
  • Investors and Biotech Companies: Must understand the scope of protection and existing patent thickets in the pipeline to evaluate freedom to operate and market entry timing.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 11,649,217 exhibits a carefully crafted scope through a layered claim strategy that balances breadth and robustness. Its claims encompass specific chemical entities, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses, positioning it as a strategic asset within its target space. The patent landscape surrounding this patent is characterized by numerous related patents indicating an active sphere of R&D, requiring ongoing vigilance for defensibility and expansion strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The '217 patent's scope hinges on well-drafted independent claims targeting specific chemical structures and methods, with dependent claims narrowing protection.
  • Its position within a dense patent landscape underscores the importance of strategic patent prosecution, continuous monitoring, and comprehensive FTO analyses.
  • Broad claims provide leverage in licensing and litigation but demand rigorous enforcement and defensibility against prior art challenges.
  • Stakeholders should align their R&D and legal strategies according to the evolving patent landscape, especially given the competitive nature of the targeted therapeutic area.
  • Ongoing innovation, such as modifications to chemical structures or methods, can extend patent life and broaden protections, which should be pursued proactively.

FAQs

1. What type of inventions does U.S. Patent 11,649,217 primarily cover?
It covers novel chemical compounds, their synthesis, and therapeutic methods of use, focusing on specific structures and formulations within a designated therapeutic class.

2. How does the scope of the '217 patent impact potential competitors?
Its claims delineate the boundary of protected compounds and methods, guiding competitors to design around specific features or pursue alternative structures to avoid infringement.

3. What are common challenges in maintaining the validity of such a patent?
Challenges may arise from prior art that anticipates or renders obvious the claimed inventions, requiring strong patent prosecution and potential claim narrowing.

4. How does the patent landscape influence R&D decisions?
Understanding related patents helps assess patent thickets, freedom to operate, and opportunities for licensing or licensing-around strategies, shaping R&D pipelines.

5. Can this patent be extended or broadened in future filings?
Yes. Through continuations, divisional applications, or patent term extensions, patent owners can expand claims, add new embodiments, or prolong market exclusivity.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent 11,649,217.
  2. Patent Landscape Reports (e.g., IP specialists' analyses relevant to the specific therapeutic class).
  3. Scientific literature and prior patents cited within the patent prosecution history.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,649,217

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat TABLET;ORAL 216951-001 Feb 1, 2023 DISCN Yes No 11,649,217 ⤷  Get Started Free Y A METHOD OF TREATING ANEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat TABLET;ORAL 216951-002 Feb 1, 2023 DISCN Yes No 11,649,217 ⤷  Get Started Free Y A METHOD OF TREATING ANEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat TABLET;ORAL 216951-003 Feb 1, 2023 DISCN Yes No 11,649,217 ⤷  Get Started Free Y A METHOD OF TREATING ANEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat TABLET;ORAL 216951-004 Feb 1, 2023 DISCN Yes No 11,649,217 ⤷  Get Started Free Y A METHOD OF TREATING ANEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat TABLET;ORAL 216951-005 Feb 1, 2023 DISCN Yes No 11,649,217 ⤷  Get Started Free Y A METHOD OF TREATING ANEMIA ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,649,217

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2018330994 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3112277 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 111093668 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 3682884 ⤷  Get Started Free
Spain 2980121 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.