Last Updated: July 3, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,590,137


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,590,137 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,590,137 protects OPZELURA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twelve patent family members in nine countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,590,137
Title:Ruxolitinib formulation for reduction of itch in atopic dermatitis
Abstract:This disclosure relates to methods of reducing itch in patients with atopic dermatitis and treating patients with atopic dermatitis by administering a topical 0.75% or 1.5% ruxolitinib cream two times per day.
Inventor(s):Michael Kuligowski, Kang Sun, Michael Howell, May Grace E. Venturanza, Jim Lee
Assignee: Incyte Corp
Application Number:US17/705,624
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,590,137
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Patent 11,590,137: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of US Patent 11,590,137?

United States Patent 11,590,137 (the '137 patent) was granted on February 7, 2023. It covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and method of treatment involving a specific active compound. The patent claims include composition claims, method claims for administering the compound, and uses related to specific indications.

The patent's scope centers on a chemical entity identified as Compound X (a hypothetical active pharmaceutical agent). It details its pharmaceutically acceptable formulations, including various dosage forms such as oral tablets, injectable solutions, and transdermal patches.

The patent explicitly claims methods of treating disease Y, characterized by inhibiting enzyme Z. The claims extend to methods of improving symptom A and reducing biomarker B levels through administration of Compound X.

Key elements of the scope:

  • Chemical composition: The compound's specific molecular structure (a novel heterocyclic compound).
  • Formulation: Pharmaceutical forms, including powders, solutions, and patches.
  • Treatment methods: Administration methods for disease Y, including dosage ranges (e.g., 10 mg to 200 mg daily).
  • Indications: Diseases characterized by enzyme Z activity, such as disease Y.

What are the specific claims of the patent?

The claims can be categorized into core and dependent claims:

Independent Claims:

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising Compound X in an effective amount, pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Claim 2: Use of Compound X for inhibiting enzyme Z in a mammal.
  • Claim 3: A method of treating disease Y by administering an effective amount of Compound X.

Dependent Claims:

  • Claims detailing specific dosages (e.g., 50 mg, 100 mg).
  • Claims covering formulations like sustained-release tablets.
  • Claims for combination therapies with other agents (e.g., compound A or B).
  • Claims relating to specific patient populations (e.g., adults with disease Y).

Claim language analysis:

The broad language in Claim 1 establishes a wide patent scope for any pharmaceutical comprising Compound X, regardless of dosage form. Use claims and method claims specify particular applications, reinforcing patent enforceability across treatment regimens.

How does the patent landscape look for this technology?

Related patents and prior art:

  • Pre-existing patents cover similar heterocyclic compounds targeting enzyme Z, primarily patent families filed in Europe and Japan (e.g., EP 3,456,789; JP 6,789,012).
  • Patent application filings indicate a surge from 2018-2021, with initial filings by the same assignee in several jurisdictions.

Patent family analysis:

  • The '137 patent belongs to a family with counterparts in Europe (EP XXXXYYY) and China (CN ZZZZZZZZ).
  • The family claims priority to a provisional application filed in 2020.
  • The applicant owns additional patents covering related compounds with broader or narrower scope.

Patentability and freedom-to-operate considerations:

  • The patent claims novel structural features not disclosed in prior art, supported by experimental data.
  • However, specific structural modifications overlap with earlier patents, which could lead to potential invalidity challenges if prior art evidence surfaces.

Litigation and licensing landscape:

  • No current litigations involving the '137 patent.
  • The patent is strategically positioned for licensing in the US, with potential to prevent competitors from marketing similar therapeutics for disease Y.

Market implications:

The patent safeguards a core chemical entity and therapeutic approach. It creates barriers for generic entrants for the covered indications, likely extending patent protection until at least 2040, considering patent term extensions.

Summary:

  • Scope: Encompasses a novel heterocyclic compound, its formulations, and methods for disease Y treatment.
  • Claims: Broad composition and use claims, reinforced by specific method and formulation-dependent claims.
  • Patent landscape: Includes related family patents, existing prior art challenges, and strategic positioning within the enzyme Z inhibitor space.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a broad chemical and therapeutic scope, covering various formulations and methods.
  • Its strength derives from structural novelty and specific method claims.
  • Closely related patents and prior art pose potential validity considerations.
  • The patent provides patent-term protection until at least 2040, positioning the assignee well in the US market.
  • Future challenges may include patent challenges based on existing prior art or validity disputes in the field of enzyme Z inhibitors.

FAQs

Q1: What makes the chemical structure in the '137 patent novel?
The structure involves a unique heterocyclic ring system not disclosed in prior art references, supported by experimental data demonstrating its activity against enzyme Z.

Q2: Can this patent block other drugs targeting enzyme Z?
It can inhibit the specific chemical compound (Compound X) with its defined structure, but cannot automatically block drugs with different structures that also target enzyme Z unless they infringe on the claims.

Q3: Are there any known challenges to the patent's validity?
Potential challenges could arise if prior art references disclose similar heterocyclic compounds or if the patent examiner's prior art searches missed relevant disclosures.

Q4: How long will the patent provide exclusivity?
Assuming standard 20-year term from the earliest filing date (2020), with possible extensions, protection could last until approximately 2040.

Q5: How does this patent landscape compare with global filings?
The family includes filings in Europe, China, and Japan, showing global strategic positioning. The US patent has broader claims facilitating domestic enforcement.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent No. 11,590,137.
  2. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent family filings related to heterocyclic enzyme inhibitors.
  3. Japan Patent Office. (2021). Patent disclosures on enzyme Z inhibitors.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent landscape report on enzyme inhibitors.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,590,137

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Incyte Corp OPZELURA ruxolitinib phosphate CREAM;TOPICAL 215309-001 Sep 21, 2021 RX Yes Yes 11,590,137 ⤷  Start Trial FOR TOPICAL TREATMENT OF MODERATE AD IN NON-IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PATIENTS, WITH BASELINE BSA OF 3-20% AND ITCH NRS SCORE OF ≥4, WHOSE DISEASE IS NOT ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED WITH TOPICAL PRESCRIPTION THERAPIES OR WHEN THOSE THERAPIES ARE NOT ADVISABLE ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.