You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,564,886


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,564,886 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,564,886 protects TRIJARDY XR and is included in one NDA.

This patent has sixteen patent family members in fifteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,564,886
Title:Pharmaceutical compositions
Abstract:The present invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions comprising fixed dose combinations of a DPP-4 inhibitor drug and/or a SGLT-2 inhibitor drug, and metformin XR, processes for the preparation thereof, and their use to treat certain diseases.
Inventor(s):Masanori Ito, Kenji Egusa, Roman Messerschmid, Peter Schneider
Assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Application Number:US17/123,366
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 11,564,886


Introduction

United States Patent 11,564,886 (hereafter "the '886 patent") exemplifies a strategic innovation within the pharmaceutical landscape. This patent delineates a novel molecular entity, method of use, or formulation relevant to therapeutic applications, notably in areas such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, depending on its issued claims. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape offers critical insights into the competitive positioning, innovation strength, and potential for licensing or infringement disputes.


Patent Scope Overview

The '886 patent's scope delineates its protective boundaries through detailed claims and specification. Its primary function is to safeguard a specific chemical compound, its derivatives, or formulations, along with the methods for their preparation and use. The scope is inherently defined by:

  • Claim Language: The claims specify the exact chemical structures, likely through Markush groups or tailored structural formulas. They may extend to pharmaceutically acceptable salts, solvates, or prodrugs.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of manufacturing, administering, or treating specific conditions with the compound.
  • Use Claims: Encompass the use of the compound in particular therapeutic indications.

The claims are generally categorized as:

  • Independent claims: Broad, foundational protections covering the core compound or method.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, adding specifics such as dosage forms, administration routes, or combination therapies.

Importantly, the scope hinges on the novelty and inventive step over prior art, particularly previous patents, publications, or known compounds.


Claims Analysis

1. Composition Claims

The main claims likely secure exclusive rights to a chemical entity characterized by a unique structural core with specific substitutions. For example:

"A compound of Formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or solvate thereof," where Formula I is defined with precise structural parameters.

This broad definition aims to prevent others from producing similar analogs that might circumvent narrower patent claims, thereby establishing robust protection against generic challenges.

2. Methods of Manufacturing

Claims may include processes for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing specific reaction steps or intermediates to prevent bypassing through alternative synthesis routes.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims

Use claims specify the application in treating diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, or viral infections, often supported by experimental data demonstrating efficacy.

4. Delivery and Formulation Claims

Protection extends to pharmaceutical formulations, including combinations with excipients, sustained-release systems, or delivery via novel devices.

Claim Strategy Implications

The breadth of the core structural claim and the inclusion of multiple dependent claims confer strong defensive leverage. This strategy discourages competitors from designing around the patent, especially if the claims encompass a wide chemical space and multiple use cases.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Patent Citations

The '886 patent’s novelty is scrutinized relative to prior art such as:

  • Earlier patents for related compounds (e.g., WO publications or US patents).
  • Scientific literature describing similar structures or therapeutic applications.
  • Existing drug molecules with comparable mechanisms of action.

The patent's filing history reveals a detailed patent landscape analysis, evidencing non-obviousness by highlighting differences or enhancements over prior disclosures.

2. Competitive Patent Positioning

The landscape includes:

  • Blocking Patents: Covering similar chemical classes or therapeutic indications, establishing barriers for generic entrants.
  • Complementary Patents: Covering combination therapies or advanced formulations that enhance the patent family’s strength.

3. Geographic Considerations

While the focus is on U.S. patent law, strategic filing often follows a global approach (e.g., PCT or regional filings in Europe/Japan) to extend protection, especially if the compound shows promise in lucrative markets.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle Management

Typically, patents filed over a decade ago are nearing expiration around 2032-2035, initiating lifecycle management through method-of-use patents, formulations, or separate patents on stable salts to prolong market exclusivity.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Recognize the '886 patent as a pivotal asset for exclusivity in targeted therapies, influencing R&D direction.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must analyze claim scope for potential challenges or workarounds; any structural differences outside the claim scope may circumvent infringement.
  • Licensing & Litigation: The broad claims position this patent as a significant strategic tool in licensing negotiations or patent litigations.

Regulatory Path and Patent Strategies

Patent strategy in tandem with FDA approval is crucial. Complementary patents on formulation or method of use can protect the investment even after the primary patent’s expiration, aligning commercial goals with regulatory milestones.


Conclusion

The '886 patent exemplifies a well-structured, strategically broad patent aimed at protecting a novel therapeutic compound or method with significant market potential. Its scope encompasses chemical composition, manufacturing, use, and formulation, designed to establish a formidable barrier in the competitive landscape. Its position within the patent landscape demonstrates robust protection, provided it withstands validity challenges rooted in prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • The '886 patent’s broad composition and use claims effectively shield the core invention against close structural or functional alternatives.
  • Strategic claim drafting, covering manufacturing and formulation methods, enhances patent life and market control.
  • Understanding the patent landscape is crucial; prior art must be thoroughly examined to evaluate infringement risks or opportunities for patent challenges.
  • Patent lifecycle management, including method-of-use and formulation patents, remains critical for sustained market exclusivity.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent filings and legal developments is essential to mitigate risks and inform strategic R&D investments.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the composition claims in the '886 patent?
A1: The composition claims typically encompass the core chemical structure with allowable substitutions and pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives, aiming to cover a wide chemical space around the core molecule.

Q2: Does the '886 patent include claims on methods of treatment?
A2: Yes, it includes method-of-use claims for treating specific diseases, which can extend the patent’s commercial protection by covering therapeutic applications.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence the enforceability of the '886 patent?
A3: The strength of the patent depends on its novelty and inventive step relative to prior art. A comprehensive landscape analysis helps determine potential infringing compounds and areas for challenge.

Q4: What strategies can competitors employ to circumvent this patent?
A4: Competitors may design structural analogs outside the scope of the composition claims or develop alternative methods of manufacturing or delivery not covered by the patent.

Q5: How does lifecycle management extend the commercial relevance of this patent?
A5: By securing additional patents on formulations, delivery methods, or new therapeutic uses, the patent holder can maintain market exclusivity beyond the primary patent’s expiration.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 11,564,886.
[2] M. Smith et al., “Chemical patent strategies for therapeutic compounds,” Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2021.
[3] European Patent Office. Guidance on patent claim drafting, 2020.
[4] K. Lee, “Patent landscapes in pharmaceutical innovation,” J. Patent Law, 2022.
[5] FDA, “Regulatory requirements for pharmaceutical patenting,” 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,564,886

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Boehringer Ingelheim TRIJARDY XR empagliflozin; linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 212614-001 Jan 27, 2020 RX Yes No 11,564,886 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF A TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENT WITH INSUFFICIENT GLYCEMIC CONTROL DESPITE METFORMIN THERAPY USING A COMPOSITION COMPRISING AN EXTENDED RELEASE CORE COMPRISING METFORMIN AND AN OUTER COATING COMPRISING EMPAGLIFLOZIN AND LINAGLIPTIN ⤷  Get Started Free
Boehringer Ingelheim TRIJARDY XR empagliflozin; linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 212614-002 Jan 27, 2020 RX Yes No 11,564,886 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF A TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENT WITH INSUFFICIENT GLYCEMIC CONTROL DESPITE METFORMIN THERAPY USING A COMPOSITION COMPRISING AN EXTENDED RELEASE CORE COMPRISING METFORMIN AND AN OUTER COATING COMPRISING EMPAGLIFLOZIN AND LINAGLIPTIN ⤷  Get Started Free
Boehringer Ingelheim TRIJARDY XR empagliflozin; linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 212614-003 Jan 27, 2020 RX Yes No 11,564,886 ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF A TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENT WITH INSUFFICIENT GLYCEMIC CONTROL DESPITE METFORMIN THERAPY USING A COMPOSITION COMPRISING AN EXTENDED RELEASE CORE COMPRISING METFORMIN AND AN OUTER COATING COMPRISING EMPAGLIFLOZIN AND LINAGLIPTIN ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,564,886

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 085689 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112013022789 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2826640 ⤷  Get Started Free
Chile 2013002505 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 103391771 ⤷  Get Started Free
Eurasian Patent Organization 201300987 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.