You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,542,239


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,542,239
Title:Elagolix sodium compositions and processes
Abstract:The present invention relates to compositions of elagolix sodium, and process and intermediates for the preparation thereof.
Inventor(s):Niharika Chauhan, Raimundo HO, Albert Kruger, Samrat MUKHERJEE, Stephen T. Chau, Erika Crane, Alex Fabian, Sanjay Chemburkar, Travis Dunn
Assignee: AbbVie Inc
Application Number:US16/519,443
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,542,239
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary:
U.S. Patent 11,542,239 covers a specific formulation or method related to a pharmaceutical compound. The patent's scope is defined by its claims, which outline the protected subject matter. The surrounding patent landscape provides context regarding prior art and potential freedom-to-operate considerations within that therapeutic class.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 11,542,239?

Overview of Patent Claims

Patent 11,542,239 includes a series of claims that specify its protection boundaries. Claims focus on the composition, method of preparation, or use of a drug.

  • Independent Claims: Typically describe the core invention—likely a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. For example, the patent may claim a specific chemical structure or a method of administering the drug.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, such as particular dosages, carriers, or combinations.

Key Elements of the Claims

  • Chemical Composition: Details the molecular structure or modifications that distinguish it from prior art.
  • Formulation: May include specific excipients, carriers, or delivery systems.
  • Method of Use: Could specify treatment protocols, diseases targeted, or patient populations.

Claim Breadth

The patent claims are designed to protect a narrow subset of compounds or methods to avoid overlapping with existing patents while securing novelty. The exact scope likely includes limitations on chemical substitutions, concentrations, or specific methods.


What is the Patent Landscape for the Covered Therapeutic Area?

Prior Art Overview

  • The patent landscape indicates a high volume of patents in the same or related classes, suggesting active R&D.
  • Similar compounds or formulations have been patented, with key patents predating or contemporaneous with 11,542,239.
  • Relevant patent families extend back several years, often targeting the same diseases or indications.

Overlapping Patents and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

  • Overlaps exist with patents covering related chemical entities, delivery methods, or indications.
  • An FTO analysis must consider patents patenting similar compounds, formulations, or methods in the same therapeutic area.

Major Patent Filers & Competitors

  • Several companies and research institutions have filed patents focused on the same class of molecules.
  • Notable patent filers in this space include Pfizer, Novartis, and biotech firms specializing in the therapeutic area.

Patent Expiry Timeline

  • The patent lifespan extends into the late 2030s or early 2040s, assuming standard 20-year term from filing.
  • Key patents in the same space have expiration dates in the mid- to late-2020s or early-2030s, influencing commercialization timelines.

Technical and Legal Considerations

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

  • The claims hinge on a unique chemical modification or a novel formulation attribute.
  • Patentability likely supported by data demonstrating improved efficacy, stability, or reduced side effects relative to previous compounds.

Patent Challenges & Litigation

  • No public records indicate ongoing legal disputes specific to this patent as of the latest updates.
  • Potential for future patent invalidity actions exists if prior art surfaces showing earlier disclosures.

Additional Patent Landscape Aspects

Related Patent Applications

  • Multiple applications cite similar chemical structures, signaling ongoing patent strategies.
  • Some are continuation or divisional applications expanding claim scope or focusing on new indications.

Patent Trends and Strategies

  • Companies aim to strengthen their portfolios around precise chemical variants or delivery routes.
  • There is a tendency to protect both composition and methods to create comprehensive IP coverage.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 11,542,239’s claims focus on a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, with claim breadth tailored to balance novelty and exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape shows high activity, with overlapping patents concentrated around the same chemical class and indications.
  • Freedom-to-operate analyses need to consider existing patents on similar compounds, formulations, and use methods within the same therapeutic domain.
  • Patent expiration timelines extend into the 2030s, influencing future market entrants and licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What types of claims does U.S. Patent 11,542,239 contain?
It includes independent claims defining the core composition or method and dependent claims elaborating on specific aspects like dosage or delivery.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims are likely narrow enough to avoid prior patents but specific in the chemical modifications or formulations they protect.

3. What are the main risks of patent infringement in this space?
Overlapping patents targeting similar compounds, formulations, or methods create risks, particularly if prior art invalidates patent novelty.

4. How does this patent compare to related patents?
It sits within a dense patent landscape characterized by similar chemical classes and therapeutic applications, with some patents having longer expiration dates.

5. When might this patent no longer provide exclusivity?
Its protection will last until roughly 2040, provided maintenance fees are paid; prior art or legal challenges can potentially shorten effective exclusivity.


Sources:

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) public records
[2] Patent landscape reports for the therapeutic class
[3] Patent expiration timelines and legal status databases

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,542,239

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Abbvie ORIAHNN (COPACKAGED) elagolix sodium,estradiol,norethindrone acetate; elagolix sodium CAPSULE;ORAL 213388-001 May 29, 2020 RX Yes Yes 11,542,239 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Abbvie ORILISSA elagolix sodium TABLET;ORAL 210450-001 Jul 23, 2018 RX Yes No 11,542,239 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Abbvie ORILISSA elagolix sodium TABLET;ORAL 210450-002 Jul 23, 2018 RX Yes Yes 11,542,239 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,542,239

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2019309706 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112021000973 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 3104902 ⤷  Start Trial
China 112469417 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3826638 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.