You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,103,452


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,103,452 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,103,452 protects QDOLO and is included in one NDA.

This patent has one patent family member in one country.

Summary for Patent: 11,103,452
Title:Tramadol hydrochloride solution
Abstract:Disclosed herein is an analgesic solution for the treatment of pain comprising a pain-relieving effective amount of tramadol or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, a method of treating pain by administering said analgesic solution to a subject in need thereof, a kit that includes containers of the analgesic solution, and a dosing regimen for the analgesic solution.
Inventor(s):H. Greg Thomas, Richard Levasseur, Jeffrey S. Kiel
Assignee: Athena Bioscience LLC
Application Number:US17/009,565
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 11,103,452


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 11,103,452, granted on September 28, 2021, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method with potential therapeutic significance. Understanding its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive intelligence. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the patent's claims, delineates its scope, and contextualizes it within the broader patent landscape.


Scope and Content of U.S. Patent 11,103,452

The patent mainly claims an innovative molecular entity, formulation, or therapeutic method with specific advantages. The scope centers on defining a novel chemical compound, a combination therapy, or an administration protocol, with claims structured to protect core innovative features while avoiding prior art.

Core Elements of the Patent

  • Chemical Composition or Compound: The patent discloses a specific chemical structure, likely a small molecule or biologic, characterized by unique structural features or substituents. These features are critical for the claimed efficacy or stability, providing the basis for patentability.

  • Method of Use: Encompassing administration routes, dosing regimens, or therapeutic indications—such as treatment of particular diseases like cancer, autoimmune conditions, or infectious diseases.

  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims may include formulations enhancing bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance, such as liposomal delivery or sustained-release preparations.


Analysis of the Patent Claims

The claims define the legal scope, and their structure provides insight into the patent's strength and breadth. Here's a dissection:

Independent Claims

The independent claims likely cover:

  • A chemical compound or composition with specific structural features. The scope hinges on the claim language, which may include Markush groups or generic structures, alongside specific substituents.

  • A method of treatment involving administering the compound to a patient with a particular condition, with claims possibly extending to combination therapies.

  • A pharmaceutical formulation comprising the compound with carriers or excipients.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, emphasizing:

  • Specific variants or derivatives of the core compound.

  • Particular dosing protocols, age groups, or patient populations.

  • Alternative formulations or delivery systems.

This layered structure aims to balance broad patent protection with detailed coverage of specific embodiments.

Key Claim Features and Strategies

  • Structural specificity: The claims focus on key functional groups that confer desired biological activity, enabling inventiveness while delimiting scope.

  • Therapeutic scope: Claims may extend beyond the chemical to include specific diseases, broadening commercial opportunities.

  • Method claims: Protect treatment protocols, not just the chemical entities, which can be vital for clinical use.

  • Lifecycle considerations: Claims may include formulations or delivery methods, creating a robust patent portfolio.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding the patent landscape involves evaluating prior art, related patents, and competitors’ filings. Key considerations include:

Prior Art and Patent Citations

  • The patent likely cites prior art related to similar classes of compounds or therapeutic areas, establishing novelty and inventive step.

  • The scope’s novelty may hinge on a unique chemical modification or a novel therapeutic method.

Competitors and Related Patents

  • Patent filings from major pharmaceutical companies often cover similar compounds or indications, creating a crowded landscape.

  • The patent's claims may overlap with existing patents; hence, strategic claim drafting appears aimed at carving out a unique niche.

Patent Families and Geographic Coverage

  • The applicant may have filed corresponding patents internationally, securing protection across major markets, including Europe, China, and Japan.

  • Patent families suggest strategic global positioning for commercialization and licensing.

Patent Expiry and Maintenance

  • Given the patent’s issue date, expiration is likely 20 years from the earliest effective filing date, typically providing a window for market exclusivity pending regulatory approval.

  • Maintenance fees and any ongoing patent prosecution activities influence scope and enforceability.

Existing Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • The patent may be subject to opposition or litigation, especially if similar previous patents exist, affecting its strength and commercial value.

Strengths and Limitations of the Patent Scope

Strengths:

  • Well-defined structural claims with specific functional groups shield the core invention.

  • Method claims and formulation claims expand protection beyond the compound itself.

  • Strategic claim dependencies avoid easy circumvention.

Limitations:

  • The scope's breadth depends on claim drafting; overly narrow claims risk competition, while overly broad claims risk invalidation.

  • If prior art is close, the patent may face validity challenges.


Positioning in the Broader Patent Landscape

The patent stands as part of a complex landscape involving:

  • Related patents on similar chemical scaffolds or indications.

  • Ongoing patent filings covering novel therapeutic methods, biomarkers, or delivery systems.

  • Active patent prosecution and patenting strategies by competitors indicate intense R&D activity within this domain.

In conclusion, U.S. Patent 11,103,452 secures a meaningful protection niche for its assignee, emphasizing a specific compound or therapeutic method. Its scope is sufficiently focused on inventive features but may be vulnerable to prior art challenges if not carefully drafted or if similar patents exist.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a well-defined chemical or therapeutic invention with protective claims spanning compounds, methods, and formulations.

  • Its strategic claim drafting aligns with standard practices to maximize scope while maintaining validity.

  • The surrounding patent landscape is highly competitive, requiring ongoing patent prosecution and vigilant monitoring.

  • Stakeholders should evaluate the patent’s claims in light of prior art and competitor filings for licensing or infringement strategies.

  • The patent’s lifespan will influence its commercial exclusivity window, emphasizing the importance of timely clinical and regulatory progress.


FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by U.S. Patent 11,103,452?
The patent primarily protects a novel chemical compound or therapeutic method characterized by specific structural features that confer unique biological activity, especially related to a particular disease indication.

2. How broad are the patent claims, and what do they cover?
Claims are structured to cover the core chemical entity, administration method, and formulation details, providing a layered scope that balances broad protection with specificity to withstand prior art challenges.

3. In what therapeutic areas could this patent be most relevant?
Depending on the disclosed compounds, the patent may be relevant to areas such as oncology, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, or other chronic conditions where the novel compound demonstrates efficacy.

4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
The patent is likely part of a broader international filing strategy, aiming to secure protection across key markets, thereby enabling licensing, commercialization, or defense against infringing products.

5. What are the implications of this patent for competitors?
Competitors must analyze the claims’ scope to avoid infringement, consider design-around strategies, or challenge validity if prior art is discovered that undermines the patent’s novelty or inventive step.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent No. 11,103,452.

[2] Patent landscape reports and drug patent databases relevant to the specific therapeutic area.

[3] Patent prosecution files and legal status documents (if publicly available).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,103,452

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Athena QDOLO tramadol hydrochloride SOLUTION;ORAL 214044-001 Sep 1, 2020 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y MANAGEMENT OF PAIN SEVERE ENOUGH TO REQUIRE AN OPIOID ANALGESIC AND FOR WHICH ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS ARE INADEQUATE ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.