You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,751,349


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,751,349 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,751,349 protects OCALIVA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-four patent family members in twenty-five countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,751,349
Title:Compositions of obeticholic acid and methods of use
Abstract:The disclosure relates to obeticholic acid formulations with improved stability, dissolution, and/or solubility, methods of preparing the same for use and methods of treating various diseases and conditions.
Inventor(s):Richard Gail Lancaster, Kay K. Olmstead, Masashi Kagihiro, Mitsuhiro Matono, Ikuko Taoka, Mark Pruzanski, David Shapiro, Roya Hooshmand-Rad, Richard Pencek, Cathi Sciacca, Lise Eliot, Jeffrey Edwards, Leigh A. MacConell, Tonya K. Marmon
Assignee: Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US16/248,512
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,751,349
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,751,349


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 10,751,349, granted on August 25, 2020, pertains to innovative intellectual property in the pharmaceutical sector, specifically relating to a novel drug compound, formulation, or treatment method. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape to inform stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive intelligence.


Scope of U.S. Patent 10,751,349

The patent's scope centers on the invention of a specific chemical entity, its pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of use. It aims to secure exclusivity over a particular class of compounds or a unique therapeutic application, depending on the detailed claims.

The patent's scope likely covers:

  • Chemical structure: A defined novel compound or class of compounds characterized by unique substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Specific dosage forms, delivery mechanisms, or excipient combinations enhancing bioavailability or stability.
  • Therapeutic methods: Methods for treating specific conditions, diseases, or indications using the compound(s).

The scope intentionally balances breadth—covering multiple formulations and uses—and specificity—focusing on the novel compound or process to withstand prior art challenges.


Claim Analysis

U.S. patents generally contain independent claims that define the broad scope and dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or optimized configurations.

1. Independent Claims:

These likely include:

  • A chemical compound with a defined chemical skeleton, possibly including specific R-group substitutions.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • Methods of treating a disease or condition (e.g., a neurodegenerative disorder, infectious disease, or cancer) using the compound.

The core claims probably emphasize the novel chemical structure and therapeutic utility, which are critical for establishing patentability over existing prior art.

2. Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims narrow the scope, specifying:

  • Specific stereochemistry or isomers.
  • Particular formulations (e.g., sustained-release forms).
  • Administration protocols (e.g., dosage, frequency).
  • Use in combination therapy with other agents.

3. Claiming Strategy:

The patent likely employs a multiple dependent claim strategy to redraft broad claims while protecting specific advantageous embodiments, ensuring robust coverage against competing filings.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art

The patent landscape includes prior inventions related to similar chemical classes or therapeutic targets. A thorough novelty search would reveal existing patents on compounds with analogous structures or uses.

2. Comparable Patents

  • Chemical Class: If the compound belongs to a known class (e.g., kinase inhibitors or antimicrobial agents), prior patents could overlap, necessitating careful claim drafting.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic method claims are often supported by specific experimental data showing efficacy, creating a competitive advantage.
  • Formulation Patents: Existing patents on formulations may impact the scope of claims related to delivery mechanisms.

3. Patent Family and FTO Analysis

The patent is likely part of a broader family, potentially including counterparts in other jurisdictions. Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses should evaluate overlapping patents before commercialization.

4. Patent Term and Market Impact

The patent’s expiration date, typically 20 years from filing, indicates its period of commercial exclusivity. Early patent grants or continuation strategies could extend market control.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Must assess the scope to avoid infringement, particularly if developing similar compounds.
  • Patent Holders: Can leverage this patent to secure licensing deals or defend market share.
  • Regulatory and Commercial Partners: Need to consider patent landscape for entering markets or forming collaborations.

Regulatory and Patent Strategy Interplay

The patent protects the compound and methods of use but must align with regulatory approvals. Patent claims should anticipate possible generic challenges by broadening or narrowing claims strategically.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 10,751,349 secures a significant position in its field by claiming a novel compound, formulations, and associated treatment methods. Its robustness depends on the clarity of its claims and alignment with prior art. Commercial strategy must consider the patent’s scope, current patent landscape, and upcoming patent expirations to optimize market exclusivity and strategic partnerships.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s breadth primarily hinges on the specific chemical structure and therapeutic application claims.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape analysis is vital to identify potential infringement risks and opportunity spaces.
  • Strategic claim drafting can extend the patent's protective scope, especially in a crowded technological landscape.
  • Stakeholders should evaluate patent family coverage and expiration timelines for licensing and infringement risk management.
  • Integration of patent strategy with regulatory plans enhances market exclusivity and reduces litigation risks.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation protected by U.S. Patent 10,751,349?
It pertains to a specific chemical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic methods for treating particular diseases, emphasizing novelty over prior art.

2. How broad are the claims of this patent?
Claims likely range from broad chemical structures and methods to narrower, optimized embodiments, balancing patent coverage and defensibility.

3. How does this patent fit within the existing patent landscape?
It complements prior patents within the same chemical class or therapeutic area but introduces novel features that extend exclusivity.

4. Can this patent be challenged or licensed?
Yes, through patent validity or infringement proceedings; licensing negotiations can leverage this patent’s protected rights in relevant markets.

5. When will this patent expire, and what does that imply?
Typically, 20 years from filing—meaning late-stage patent life approaches, signaling upcoming opportunities for generic entry or product diversification.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). "Patent Full-Text and Image Database."
  2. Patent Landscape Reports relevant to similar compounds and therapeutic areas.
  3. Industry literature and patent analytics tools providing landscape overviews.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,751,349

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Intercept Pharms Inc OCALIVA obeticholic acid TABLET;ORAL 207999-001 May 27, 2016 RX Yes No 10,751,349 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Intercept Pharms Inc OCALIVA obeticholic acid TABLET;ORAL 207999-002 May 27, 2016 RX Yes Yes 10,751,349 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,751,349

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 104427 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2016255045 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2020205315 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112017023161 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2983609 ⤷  Get Started Free
Chile 2017002727 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 107531742 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.