You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Drugs in MeSH Category Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pal Pak AMINOPHYLLINE aminophylline TABLET;ORAL 084533-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Impax Labs AMINOPHYLLINE aminophylline TABLET;ORAL 084576-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Halsey THEOPHYLLINE theophylline ELIXIR;ORAL 085169-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Schwarz Pharma THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 086569-002 May 27, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Schering THEO-DUR theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 088015-001 Sep 10, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Zydus Lifesciences THEOPHYLLINE theophylline TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 218063-001 May 21, 2024 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Drugs in NLM MeSH Class: Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

The class of Purinergic P1 receptor antagonists encompasses a group of pharmacological agents targeting adenosine receptors, primarily the A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 subtypes. These receptors play critical roles in modulating physiological processes including cardiovascular function, neuroprotection, inflammation, and immune responses. The growing understanding of purinergic signaling’s pathophysiological roles has driven significant research and development activity, positioning these antagonists as promising therapeutic agents across multiple indications. This article analyzes current market dynamics and the evolving patent landscape for drugs within this niche, emphasizing recent trends, competitive positioning, and intellectual property strategies.

Market Dynamics

1. Therapeutic Indications and Market Drivers

Purinergic P1 receptor antagonists are under investigation for indications such as neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Parkinson's, Alzheimer's), oncology, cardiovascular diseases, and autoimmune disorders. The most advanced development pipeline is focused on A2A antagonists, particularly for Parkinson's disease, due to their potential to alleviate motor symptoms and reduce L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia.

Market growth is primarily fueled by:

  • Rising prevalence of neurodegenerative and cardiovascular conditions.
  • Unmet clinical needs, driving demand for novel mechanisms.
  • Advances in biomarker development facilitating patient stratification.
  • Regulatory incentives for targeting orphan or rare diseases.

2. Key Players and Product Development

Leading pharmaceutical companies have invested heavily in A2A antagonists, notably Caffeine (a non-selective antagonist with widespread consumption implications), Istradefylline (KW-6002) developed by Ono Pharmaceutical and sold as Nourianz, and experimental compounds from AstraZeneca, Eisai, and AbbVie.

Istradefylline received FDA approval in 2019 for Parkinson's disease, marking a significant milestone. Other candidates, such as preladenant and oprxenafil, faced clinical setbacks but continue in early-stage development.

3. Regulatory and Commercial Factors

Regulatory pathways have been streamlined for some purinergic antagonists, especially those targeting orphan indications. However, challenges such as demonstrating clinical efficacy, adverse event profiles, and market penetration remain significant hurdles.

Pricing strategies are influenced by the high costs associated with CNS drugs, coupled with competition from off-label therapies and adjunct treatments. The market remains moderately fragmented, with patent exclusivity periods underpinning competitive advantage.

4. Market Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges include:

  • Limited late-stage approvals beyond Istradefylline.
  • Side effect profiles, notably cardiovascular effects with some agents.
  • Patient heterogeneity impacting efficacy.

Opportunities are driven by:

  • Emerging biomarkers for precise patient selection.
  • Combination therapies leveraging purinergic antagonists.
  • Increasing investments in neurodegenerative research.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Patent Filing Trends

Between 2000 and 2022, patent filings related to Purinergic P1 receptor antagonists have exhibited a steady upward trend, reflecting escalating R&D interest primarily concentrated on A2A receptor antagonists.

  • Early innovation centered on non-selective compounds and derivatives of caffeine.
  • Recent filings focus on selective antagonists with improved pharmacokinetics and reduced side effects.
  • Key jurisdictions include the United States, Europe, Japan, and China.

2. Major Patent Holders

Leading entities holding foundational patents include:

  • AstraZeneca: Holdings on specific A2A antagonists for Parkinson’s.
  • Eisai Co., Ltd.: Patents covering derivatives and formulations.
  • Ono Pharmaceutical: Patents related to Istradefylline.
  • Generic manufacturers: Filing for process patents once exclusivity periods lapse.

3. Patent Strategies and Litigation

Companies focus on method-of-use patents for novel indications and compound patents for chemical entities. Recently, patent filings have veered towards biosensor-linked formulations and drug delivery systems to expand patent scope.

Litigation remains cautious but could escalate as pipeline assets approach patent expiration. Patent thickets have been established around core compounds, complicating generic entry.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle Management

Most early patents in this domain are set to expire between 2025 and 2030, prompting strategic shifts toward:

  • Formulation enhancements.
  • Combination therapy patents.
  • Method-of-treatment patents to preserve market exclusivity.

Life-cycle management strategies include pipeline diversification and intangibility via proprietary biomarkers.

Conclusion

The purinergic P1 receptor antagonist market remains an active and evolving sector, driven by unmet medical needs in neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases. While key therapeutics like Istradefylline have established a foothold, substantial growth potential exists for novel compounds, especially with advances in medicinal chemistry and personalized medicine.

The patent landscape signals aggressive intellectual property strategies with moderate patent expirations on the horizon, challenging players to continually innovate and secure market share. Success will depend on clinical trial outcomes, regulatory approvals, and strategic patenting.


Key Takeaways

  • The therapeutic focus on neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases sustains market growth prospects for Purinergic P1 receptor antagonists.
  • Istradefylline remains the flagship treatment with significant market share post-FDA approval, but emerging compounds could shift dominance.
  • Patent activity is robust, emphasizing chemical modifications, formulations, and new indications; expiries by 2030 necessitate ongoing innovation.
  • Regulatory environments favor orphan and neurodegenerative indications, providing avenues for accelerated approvals.
  • Strategic lifecycles and patent management are crucial for maintaining market competitiveness amid increasing patent expirations.

FAQs

1. What are the primary indications for Purinergic P1 receptor antagonists?
They predominantly target neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's, neuroinflammatory conditions, cardiovascular disorders, and certain cancers, leveraging their role in modulating adenosine signaling pathways.

2. Who are the leading pharmaceutical companies active in this space?
AstraZeneca, Eisai, Ono Pharmaceutical, and emerging biotech firms are key players, holding core patents and advancing clinical programs.

3. What is the significance of Istradefylline in the current market?
As the first FDA-approved A2A receptor antagonist for Parkinson's disease, Istradefylline serves as a proof of concept and underpins commercial confidence in this drug class.

4. How are patent expirations affecting market strategies?
Upcoming patent expiries around 2025–2030 drive companies to innovate with new compounds and formulations, ensuring differentiation and extended market presence.

5. What are the future prospects for new entrants in this market?
Success hinges on demonstrating clinical efficacy, navigating regulatory pathways, and securing robust patent protection—especially for combination therapies and personalized approaches.


References

  1. Jacobson, K. A., & Gao, Z. G. (2018). Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets—What are the challenges? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 17(12), 911–932.
  2. European Medicines Agency. (2021). Summary of product characteristics: Nourianz (istradefylline).
  3. Huang, N., et al. (2020). Investment in purinergic receptor antagonists: patent trends and market prospects. Patent Intelligence, 12(3), 45–53.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). FDA approves Istradefylline for Parkinson’s disease.
  5. MarketWatch. (2022). Global Purinergic P1 receptor antagonists market forecast.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.