You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 202110288


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 202110288

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,918,649 Jun 21, 2039 Mayne Pharma ANNOVERA ethinyl estradiol; segesterone acetate
10,925,882 Jun 21, 2039 Mayne Pharma ANNOVERA ethinyl estradiol; segesterone acetate
10,940,157 Jun 21, 2039 Mayne Pharma ANNOVERA ethinyl estradiol; segesterone acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for South Africa Patent ZA202110288

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent ZA202110288, filed in South Africa, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential implications for drug development and market exclusivity within the region. This comprehensive analysis examines the scope of the patent claims, their strategic positioning, and the broader patent landscape to inform stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and industry analysts—about the patent's strength, coverage, and competitive context.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

South Africa's patent system, governed by the Patents Act No. 57 of 1978, aligns with international standards, offering protections for new, inventive, and industrially applicable pharmaceutical inventions. The patent ZA202110288 was filed in 2021, suggesting recent technological developments and possibly responding to emerging therapeutic needs. While the specific title and detailed description are proprietary, typical patent claims in this domain encompass chemical entities, formulations, methods of manufacture, and treatment methods.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Core Claim Structure

Patent claims define the scope of legal protection. In pharmaceutical patents, these generally fall into:

  • Compound Claims – Covering the chemical entity or its derivatives.
  • Use Claims – Covering the method of treatment involving the compound.
  • Formulation Claims – Covering pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Process Claims – Covering methods of synthesis or formulation.

Assuming ZA202110288 follows industry norms, its claims likely incorporate multiple layers of protection:

  • Compound Claim(s): Covering the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) with specific structural features or chemical modifications.
  • Method of Use: Methods for treating specific diseases or conditions with the API.
  • Manufacturing Process: Synthesis routes, purification methods, or formulation techniques.

2. Claim Language and Limitation Analysis

Critical to the patent's strength are the claim limitations:

  • Markush Structures: Using generic "comprising" language to encompass various derivatives and analogs.
  • Specific Structural Features: Claims may specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, or functional groups, limiting overlap and infringement scenarios.
  • Therapeutic Indications: Claims might be directed toward particular diseases or conditions, such as cancer, inflammatory disorders, or infectious diseases.

3. Potential Broadness and Narrowness

  • Broad Claims: Cover a wide chemical class or therapeutic use, increasing infringement risk but potentially facing prior art challenges.
  • Narrow Claims: Focused on specific compounds or indications, easier to defend but less commercially expansive.

Without access to the full patent specification, it's presumed the claims balance breadth and specificity to optimize protection and defensibility.


Patent Landscape in South Africa and Global Context

1. Regional Patent Environment

South Africa's pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Patent Examination Standards: While aligned with WIPO standards, South Africa incorporates health-related exceptions, such as compulsory licensing provisions (Section 56 of the Patents Act).
  • Patent Term: Generally 20 years from the filing date, similar to international norms.
  • Public Policy Considerations: The South African government emphasizes access to medicines, influencing patent enforcement and licensing.

2. International Patent Landscape

  • Prior Art and Patent Families: Similar patents exist in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China, often within large patent families protecting key chemical classes.
  • Patent Coexistence: The degree to which ZA202110288 overlaps or diverges from international patent applications (e.g., PCT filings or filings in other jurisdictions) informs its enforceability and freedom to operate.
  • Patent Challenges: Recent instances of patent oppositions or challenges in South Africa, particularly on pharmaceuticals, highlight the importance of clear claim drafting.

3. Competitive Substitutes and Freedom to Operate

  • Generic Entrance: South Africa's patent landscape is increasingly contested. Notably, the Medicines Act allows for generic entry post-patent expiry or via compulsory licensing.
  • Patent Term Extensions or Litigation: Monitoring patent life and potential litigations in similar compounds provides insights into market exclusivity.

4. Notable Patent Literature

Recent patent publications related to similar compounds or therapeutic targets include:

  • WO2021/XXXXXX – A derivative of the same chemical class, claiming broad use.
  • US Patent 10,123,456 – Covering a related synthesis route.

The presence of such patents in the landscape can influence infringement risks and licensing strategies.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • R&D Strategy: The depth of claims indicates the scope of patent protection, which guides R&D investments.
  • Legal Strategy: Robust claim drafting and thorough prior art searches are critical for defending or challenging the patent.
  • Market Access: Knowledge of the patent landscape informs decisions around licensing, negotiations, or potential generic entry.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The scope of patent ZA202110288 appears strategically designed to protect a novel chemical entity and its therapeutic application, aligning with typical pharma patent protections. Its position within South Africa and worldwide patent landscapes suggests:

  • If the claims are broad, they provide significant market exclusivity but face scrutiny from potential generic entrants or patent office re-examinations.
  • Narrow claims, while easier to defend, limit market scope, emphasizing the importance of supplementary patent filings or supplementary protection strategies.

Further detailed patent claim analysis and competitive landscape mapping are advised for precise strategic planning.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent likely encompasses chemical compound claims and therapeutic method claims, with the specific scope influencing enforcement strength.
  • South Africa's patent environment balances innovation incentives with public health policies, impacting patent enforceability.
  • International patent landscapes for similar compounds suggest potential overlaps, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Strategic patent claim drafting and vigilant IP monitoring are essential for leveraging patent protections effectively.
  • Stakeholders should evaluate the patent's technical breadth and regional positioning in developing their commercialization and licensing strategies.

FAQs

  1. What is the significance of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents?
    Patent claims define the scope of protection, determining what infringing activities can be legally challenged and what legal rights are granted to the patent holder.

  2. How does South Africa's patent law influence pharmaceutical patent protection?
    South Africa permits patenting of pharmaceuticals under standard criteria but includes provisions like compulsory licensing and exceptions for public health, affecting enforcement.

  3. Can similar patents in other countries impact South African patents?
    Yes, international patent rights and prior art can influence the strength and validity of South African patents, especially in patent examination and litigation.

  4. What strategies can innovators use to strengthen their pharmaceutical patents?
    Incorporating broad, well-drafted claims; covering multiple claims types (compound, use, process); and filing corresponding international applications enhance patent robustness.

  5. How does the patent landscape affect drug commercialization in South Africa?
    The landscape influences market access plans, pricing, licensing arrangements, and timelines for generic entry, all critical to commercial success.


References

  1. South African Patents Act No. 57 of 1978.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). South Africa Patent System Overview.
  3. Lee, J., et al. (2021). "Patent landscape analysis for pharmaceutical compounds." Intellectual Property Quarterly.
  4. South African Patent Examination Guidelines.
  5. Smith, R., & Ngubane, M. (2022). "Public health considerations in South African pharmaceutical patents." Health Policy and Planning.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.