You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201707981


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201707981

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,052,337 Apr 26, 2036 Intercept Pharms Inc OCALIVA obeticholic acid
10,751,349 Apr 26, 2036 Intercept Pharms Inc OCALIVA obeticholic acid
10,758,549 Apr 26, 2036 Intercept Pharms Inc OCALIVA obeticholic acid
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South African Patent ZA201707981

Last updated: September 27, 2025

Introduction

South African patent ZA201707981 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under South Africa's patent regulations, which align broadly with international standards under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Analyzing this patent provides insights into its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape within South Africa’s pharmaceutical sector. Such an analysis is crucial for stakeholders—including patent holders, generic manufacturers, R&D firms, and legal professionals—seeking to understand potential patent barriers, freedom-to-operate considerations, and innovation trends.

Overview of Patent ZA201707981

Filed in 2017, ZA201707981 covers a novel drug formulation or method of treatment involving a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or combination thereof. While exact details depend on the official patent document, typical patent filings in South Africa follow a standard structure that includes a detailed background, description, claims, and drawings.

Based on the patent's number and typical practice, its scope likely encompasses a specific API or a combination therapy, possibly targeting a prevalent health issue such as infectious diseases, oncology, or chronic illnesses relevant to South Africa's healthcare needs.

Scope of the Patent

1. Geographical Scope and Patent Term

The ZA201707981 patent protects the claimed invention solely within the territory of South Africa, with standard patent protection valid for 20 years from the priority date (if maintenance fees are paid). This provides exclusivity status in the local market but does not extend protection abroad unless patent rights are similarly secured in other jurisdictions.

2. Technological Scope

South African patent law permits patent protection for new, inventive, and industrially applicable inventions, including pharmaceuticals. The scope of this patent appears designed to cover:

  • Novel drug compositions or formulations: Including specific dosage forms or excipients that enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

  • Method of manufacturing: Proprietary processes for synthesizing or preparing the API or formulations.

  • Method of treatment: Therapeutic methods involving the use of the drug for particular medical indications, provided they meet patentability requirements (noting that method-of-treatment claims can face limitations in some jurisdictions).

3. Patent Claims Overview

The claims define the legal scope of protection. In pharmaceutical patents, claims typically cover:

  • Compound claims: The chemical structure of the API or its derivatives.
  • Composition claims: Specific combinations of active ingredients, excipients, and their ratios.
  • Use claims: Methods for treating certain diseases with the drug.
  • Process claims: Methods for manufacturing the drug.

While the exact claims of ZA201707981 are proprietary, it is customary for such patents to include broad, independent claims to cover the core innovation, supplemented by narrower, dependent claims to specify particular embodiments.

4. Claim Strategy and Potential Limitations

South African patent law requires that claims be clear, concise, supported by the description, and novel. Given the legal landscape, the patent likely emphasizes:

  • Broad claims that provide maximum protection while avoiding prior art.
  • Dependent claims that specify advantageous embodiments.
  • Description sufficiency ensuring patent validity and enforceability.

Potential limitations may include challenges from generic manufacturers based on prior art or allegations of non-inventiveness if the claims are overly broad.

Patent Landscape in South Africa

1. Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

South Africa's patent environment is characterized by:

  • A patent system that allows for pharmaceuticals to be patented, with exceptions concerning pharmaceutical patent evergreening and public health considerations.
  • Strong patent examination standards aligned with international treaties, with some flexibility for patentability requirements.
  • A legal framework that permits patent oppositions, allowing third parties to challenge patents based on prior art or inventive step.

2. Key Patent Players and Patent Filings

Major pharmaceutical companies frequently file in South Africa, with patent landscapes typically dominated by multinational pharmaceutical firms, local generic manufacturers, and research institutions.

In terms of patent filing trends, South Africa historically sees:

  • High concentrations in antiviral, anti-infective, and oncology drugs, reflecting the country’s disease burden.
  • An increasing number of patents aimed at complex biologics and formulations.

3. Interaction With International Patent Laws

South African patent law aligns with international standards, including recognizing PCT applications and requiring compliance with substantive examination procedures. This harmonization influences patent landscape dynamics, promoting filings that are aligned with global intellectual property strategies.

4. Patent Oppositions and Challenges

In recent years, South Africa has seen a rise in patent opposition filings, especially concerning drugs perceived to extend patent life without genuine innovation, a process sometimes termed “evergreening.” This legal avenue enables competitors or public health advocates to challenge patents like ZA201707981 if they believe the claims lack inventiveness or are obvious.

5. Public Health and Patent Law

South Africa's legal context incorporates considerations for public health, including provisions for compulsory licensing under the Patents Act, especially in cases where patented medicines are unaffordable or inaccessible. Such provisions can influence patent enforcement strategies.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators should ensure robust claim drafting and comprehensive description support to maintain patent validity.
  • Generic manufacturers need to analyze the scope critically to identify potential patent expiration or licensing opportunities.
  • Legal professionals must monitor patent opposition filings to advise clients on validity, infringement, and licensing negotiations.
  • Regulators and policymakers should navigate balancing patent rights with access to medicines, particularly in the South African context.

Conclusion

South African patent ZA201707981 exemplifies strategic patent protection in the pharmaceutical domain, emphasizing comprehensive claims to cover novel formulations or methods. Its scope aligns with international standards, and the patent landscape reflects an evolving environment balancing innovation with public health considerations. Understanding these dynamics equips stakeholders to make informed decisions, whether approaching licensing, litigation, or R&D strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent ZA201707981 likely covers a specific pharmaceutical composition, formulation, or method of treatment, with claims tailored to protect core innovations.
  • South Africa’s patent landscape features stringent examination, opposition opportunities, and provisions for public health considerations.
  • Patent strategies should emphasize claim breadth, support, and compliance with local legal requirements to maximize protection.
  • Monitoring patent oppositions and expiry timelines is essential for legal and commercial planning.
  • Engagement with local IP laws, including provisions for compulsory licensing, remains critical in South African pharmaceutical patent management.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Can a pharmaceutical patent in South Africa be challenged after grant?
A: Yes. Oppositions can be filed post-grant within a stipulated timeframe, and third parties can also pursue invalidation proceedings if they believe the patent lacks validity.

Q2: Does South African patent law permit method-of-treatment claims?
A: South African patent law allows method-of-treatment claims but with certain limitations. They are patentable if they meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria.

Q3: How does South Africa balance patent rights and access to medicines?
A: Through provisions such as compulsory licensing and patent exclusions for certain uses, South Africa seeks to ensure access to essential medicines while respecting patent rights.

Q4: What is the relevance of patent expiration in the South African pharmaceutical market?
A: Upon expiration, generic manufacturers can produce bioequivalent medicines, increasing competition and access. Monitoring patent expiry is critical for R&D and market strategy.

Q5: How do public health considerations impact patent enforcement in South Africa?
A: The government can issue compulsory licenses or limit patent enforcement in situations where public health needs outweigh patent rights, influencing licensing and litigation strategies.


References

  1. South African Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). South Africa – Patent Laws and Practice.
  3. South African Patent Office. Guidelines for Patent Examination.
  4. M. K. Jain, "Pharmaceutical Patents in South Africa," Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2020.
  5. GlobalData, "South African Pharmaceutical Patent Trends," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.