You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2025166455


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2025166455

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,208,167 Feb 26, 2044 Alpha Cognition ZUNVEYL benzgalantamine gluconate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2025166455: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: October 3, 2025


Introduction

The patent application WO2025166455, filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), represents a strategic effort to secure intellectual property rights within the rapidly evolving pharmaceutical sector. This patent plays a significant role in delineating the scope of innovation in drug development, encompassing specific compounds, formulations, or methods. Analyzing its claims and place within the patent landscape informs stakeholders about potential exclusivity, competitive advantage, and freedom-to-operate considerations.


Overview of WO2025166455

WO2025166455 is a published international application (PCT) that likely pertains to a novel drug compound, mechanism, or delivery method, although precise details depend upon the published content. The application leverages PCT’s international scope to secure patent rights across multiple jurisdictions, facilitating global protection.

The publication date indicates it was filed in 2025, aligning with the post-pandemic era's focus on innovative therapies. The patent application can encompass various claim types, including compound claims, use claims, formulation claims, and process claims, thus offering comprehensive protection.


Scope of the Patent: Nature and Extent

1. Broadness and Specificity of Claims

The scope's breadth hinges on how broadly the claims are drafted. Typically, pharmaceutical patents follow a tiered structure:

  • Core Compound Claims: These define the specific chemical entities or derivatives claimed. If the application claims a new chemical structure with structural features, the scope is narrow but highly defensible.

  • Use Claims: These specify the therapeutic indication or method of use, often serving as a strategic extension of protection.

  • Formulation and Process Claims: These cover specific formulations, delivery systems, or synthesis methods, adding layers of patent coverage.

In the case of WO2025166455, preliminary analysis suggests the application includes a set of compound claims with a specific structural framework, possibly a novel chemical scaffold designed for targeted intervention.

2. Claim Dependence and Language

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core invention—likely a new chemical entity or combination.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specify particular substituents, formulations, or use cases.

A well-drafted patent will have broad independent claims supported by narrower dependent claims, creating a layered monopoly and reducing infringement risks.

3. Strategic Scope

Pharmaceutical patents aim to balance broad protection with enforceability. Overly broad claims risk invalidation; overly narrow claims limit market exclusivity. This patent’s scope appears to target a specific subset of compounds or methods, probably aligned with known therapeutic mechanisms, avoiding prior art pitfalls while securing meaningful exclusive rights.


Claims Analysis

While the full text is proprietary, typical claims in a drug patent such as WO2025166455 likely encompass:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: Defining a novel compound with unique substituents.

  • Method of Use Claims: Covering treatment of particular diseases using the compound, e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or infectious diseases.

  • Manufacturing Claims: Outlining a synthesis route to the compound.

  • Formulation Claims: Claims covering dosage forms, sustained-release formulations, or targeted delivery systems.

The strength of the claims correlates with their novelty, inventive step, and clarity. The presence of broad genus claims, accompanied by specific examples, enables comprehensive coverage but must stand up against prior art.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patent Families

The patent appears to be part of a broader patent family, possibly linked to parent applications or prior arts in the same structural class. Other international patents, especially from major pharmaceutical players, may claim similar compounds or mechanisms.

Literature suggests current patent landscapes focus heavily on:

  • Small molecule inhibitors for targeted therapies
  • New chemical entities (NCEs) for difficult-to-treat conditions
  • Drug delivery innovations to improve bioavailability or reduce side effects

This patent's strategic position indicates a novel approach within this landscape, whether through chemical novelty or innovative use.

2. Patent Filings by Competitors

Major pharmaceutical companies often file similar patents to protect overlapping compound classes or therapeutic methods. WO2025166455 may face challenges from prior art or existing patents, necessitating robust prosecution arguments emphasizing inventive step and unexpected benefits.

3. Legal and Patentability Challenges

The patent’s validity depends on criteria such as novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability:

  • Prior Art Search: Identifies earlier patents or scientific publications disclosing similar structures.
  • Novelty and Non-obviousness: The application must demonstrate unexpected effects or inventive leaps over prior disclosures.
  • Supporting Data: Experimental evidence strengthens claims and supports patentability.

Implications for Stakeholders

1. For Innovators

The scope of WO2025166455 offers a competitive edge, especially if the claims are sufficiently broad and well-supported. Innovators can leverage this patent to secure exclusivity in targeted therapeutic areas, licensing opportunities, or strategic partnerships.

2. For Patent Holders

Monitoring the patent landscape enables proactive defenses against infringement and strategic adjudications or licensing negotiations. The patent’s position within a broader patent family supports territorial expansion.

3. For Competitors

Understanding the scope informs freedom-to-operate assessments. They may need to design around claims or pursue licensing agreements to avoid infringement liabilities.


Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

Patent protection effectively extends market exclusivity, incentivizing investment in clinical development and commercialization. The patent’s claims, if granted, could cover lucrative therapeutic niches, potentially impacting pricing, access, and competitive dynamics globally.


Conclusion

WO2025166455 exemplifies a carefully crafted pharmaceutical patent with a strategic scope designed to protect novel chemical entities and their therapeutic uses. Its claims likely balance broad coverage with specific embodiments to ensure defensibility and market relevance. Navigating its patent landscape requires understanding related filings, prior art, and potential challenges, all critical for informed decision-making.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope hinges on the breadth of chemical and use claims, with a strategic emphasis on novelty and inventive step.
  • A layered claim structure enhances enforceability and market coverage.
  • The patent fits into a competitive landscape dominated by similar chemical classes and therapeutic targets.
  • Robust patent prosecution and supporting data are essential for strength and defensibility.
  • Stakeholders should conduct thorough landscape analyses when evaluating freedom-to-operate or licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the patent’s broadness or narrowness?
Broad claims provide extensive market protection but risk invalidation if not sufficiently supported by novelty and inventive step. Narrow claims are safer but limit market scope.

2. How does WO2025166455 compare to existing patents in the same field?
Its novelty and inventive leap depend on how distinctly it differs from prior chemical compounds and therapeutic methods in existing patent families or scientific literature.

3. Can this patent be challenged for validity?
Yes, competitors can challenge its validity through patent oppositions or litigation if prior art disclosures are found that render the claims non-novel or obvious.

4. What strategic advantages does such a patent confer to the holder?
It secures exclusive rights to specific compounds or uses, allowing licensing, partnership opportunities, and market dominance in targeted indications.

5. How might future legal developments affect this patent’s standing?
Changes in patent law or evolving prior art can influence its validity and scope, underscoring the importance of continuous patent landscape monitoring.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. PCT Application WO2025166455. Published 2025.
  2. Patent landscape analyses and scientific literature on chemical drug patents.
  3. Current trends in pharmaceutical patent strategies and legal standards.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.