You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2020172333


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2020172333

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,933,046 Feb 19, 2040 Mayne Pharma EPSOLAY benzoyl peroxide
10,945,987 Feb 19, 2040 Mayne Pharma EPSOLAY benzoyl peroxide
11,426,378 Aug 18, 2040 Mayne Pharma EPSOLAY benzoyl peroxide
11,541,026 Feb 19, 2040 Mayne Pharma EPSOLAY benzoyl peroxide
11,628,155 Dec 27, 2040 Mayne Pharma EPSOLAY benzoyl peroxide
11,865,100 Feb 19, 2040 Mayne Pharma EPSOLAY benzoyl peroxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2020172333

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2020172333 exemplifies the global innovation in pharmaceutical development. As an international patent application published under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), it aims to secure patent rights across multiple jurisdictions. This analysis delineates the scope and claims of WO2020172333, exploring its strategic position within current patent landscape trends and assessing its potential implications for drug development and market exclusivity.


Overview of WO2020172333

WO2020172333, published in August 2020, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, likely targeting conditions with significant unmet medical needs. While the specific therapeutic area may vary—potentially antimicrobial, anticancer, or metabolic disorders—the application centrally encompasses innovative chemical entities, compositions, or methods.

The patent is structured to protect inventive aspects, such as compound structures, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses. Its broad phrasing indicates a goal of comprehensive protection, conferring rights that extend beyond specific compounds to encompass related analogs and formulations.


Scope of WO2020172333

The scope of a patent application defines its legal boundaries, determining the extent of exclusive rights. For WO2020172333, the scope likely covers:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Covering the specific chemical entities claimed as novel, including derivatives and analogs within a defined chemical class. These claims often specify key functional groups or structural motifs critical to activity.
  • Preparation and Synthesis Methods: Protecting novel synthetic routes that enhance manufacturing efficiency or yield.
  • Therapeutic Uses: Claiming methods of treatment using the compounds, potentially covering multiple indications such as oncology, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.
  • Formulation Claims: Including specific pharmaceutical compositions, delivery systems, or dosage forms designed to optimize efficacy or stability.

The application probably uses a combination of product-by-process and use claims to establish broad protection. Claim language likely emphasizes the novelty, inventive step, and utility, aligning with patentability requisites under various jurisdictions.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims
The core of the patent, independent claims, delineate the essence of the invention. Likely, these encompass:

  • A chemical entity defined by a core structure with specific substituents.
  • Methods of synthesizing the compound.
  • Therapeutic indications for the compound.

2. Dependent Claims
These elaborate on independent claims, adding specificity:

  • Variations of substituents or structural modifications.
  • Alternative pharmaceutical formulations.
  • Dosage optimization or specific treatment protocols.

3. Claim Language Highlights
Given standard patent drafting practices, the claims probably use precise language such as “comprising,” “consisting of,” or “selected from,” offering a balance of breadth and enforceability.

4. Patentability Considerations
The claims' novelty hinges on the uniqueness of the chemical entity or formulation. Inventive step often resides in particular substitutions or synthetic processes not obvious to a person skilled in the art, especially if supported by pharmacological data demonstrating enhanced efficacy or safety.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

1. Priority and Priority Chain
WO2020172333 might be linked to earlier filings, such as provisional applications or regional patents, creating a patent family that fortifies global protection. Disputes or overlaps may arise where similar compounds are patented elsewhere, necessitating close examination of prior art and inventive distinctions.

2. Competitor and Tech Landscape
The pharmacological space targeted could be highly competitive, with numerous patents on similar chemical classes. Key competitors may include large pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms with proprietary compounds or licensed drugs.

Patent landscape analyses reveal:

  • Overlapping patents on chemical backbones or synthesis techniques.
  • Expanding patent families covering specific therapeutic uses or delivery mechanisms.
  • A trend towards broad composition claims to hedge against workarounds.

3. Patentability Challenges
Patents in drug space often face obstacles such as:

  • Obviousness issues if similar structures are known.
  • Prior art reference to prior syntheses or uses.
  • Patent thickets complicating freedom-to-operate analyses.

To mitigate these, applicants often emphasize unexpected pharmacological benefits or novel synthetic pathways.

4. Geographical Coverage and Patent Filing Strategy
Patent applications under WIPO facilitate multi-jurisdictional coverage, including major markets (US, EU, China, Japan). Strategic filings may prioritize jurisdictions with high drug approval activity or significant commercial value.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

The scope and claims of WO2020172333 effectively shape its enforceability and market exclusivity. Broad claims covering key chemical structures and uses can delay generic entry, incentivizing continued investment in development. Conversely, narrow claims may limit enforcement, leading to challenges from competitors with similar compounds.

From an innovation standpoint, the patent landscape reveals ongoing efforts to carve out proprietary niches within overlapping chemical and therapeutic classes. This landscape impacts licensing negotiations, patent litigation risk, and overall R&D strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Scope: WO2020172333 likely combines compound, process, and use claims to establish comprehensive patent coverage, balancing breadth with patentability requirements.
  • Claims Drafting: Precise dependent claims defend against workarounds, while broad independent claims aim to maximize exclusivity.
  • Landscape Positioning: The patent occupies a competitive space that necessitates continuous innovation and strategic filings across jurisdictions to maintain edge.
  • Challenges: Obviousness, prior art overlaps, and patent thickets complicate enforcement; detailed prior art analyses are essential.
  • Future Portfolio: The patent's robustness can be augmented through extensions, divisional applications, and alliances, safeguarding market position.

FAQs

Q1: What therapeutic areas are typically covered by patents similar to WO2020172333?
Answer: They commonly target oncology, infectious diseases, metabolic disorders, or neurodegenerative conditions. The specific area depends on the compound's pharmacological profile.

Q2: How does the scope of claims influence patent enforceability?
Answer: Broader claims can offer extensive protection but risk invalidation if found obvious or anticipated. Narrow claims provide stronger defensibility but may be easier to circumvent.

Q3: What strategies do patent applicants use to navigate crowded patent landscapes?
Answer: Applicants focus on novel structural features, specific uses, synthesis methods, or formulations to establish patentability and carve out proprietary niches.

Q4: Can WO2020172333 be challenged or invalidated after issuance?
Answer: Yes, through post-grant oppositions or invalidation proceedings based on prior art references, lack of novelty, or obviousness.

Q5: How does the PCT process impact global drug patent protection?
Answer: It simplifies initial filings and expedites international patent applications, enabling applicants to secure provisional rights across multiple jurisdictions efficiently.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. WO2020172333 Patent Publication. Available at [WIPO Patent Database].
  2. Patent landscape reports and analyses relevant to pharmaceutical chemical entities.
  3. WIPO PCT Guidelines on Drafting and Filing Patent Applications.
  4. Industry analyses on pharmaceutical patent strategies and landscape management.

(Note: As the specific details of WO2020172333 are not publicly available in this context, the analysis above reflects a strategic, generic interpretation based on typical WIPO patent filings in the pharmaceutical sector.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.