You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2019178484


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2019178484

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 27, 2039 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 15, 2039 Intra-cellular CAPLYTA lumateperone tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2019178484: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 14, 2025


Introduction

Patent WO2019178484, filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), pertains to an innovative drug molecule or pharmaceutical regimen. As global health challenges escalate, understanding patent landscapes and claim scopes associated with promising drug molecules is pivotal for pharmaceutical investors, competitors, and legal strategists. This analysis dissects the patent's scope and claims, providing a comprehensive overview of its positioning within the current patent landscape.


Overview of WO2019178484

WO2019178484 is a patent application published in 2019. Its focus is likely on a novel pharmacologically active compound, a unique formulation, or a therapeutic method. The exact nature of the invention can typically be inferred from its claims and description, which detail composition, efficacy, and innovative aspects.


Scope of the Patent

1. General Scope and Purpose

The patent's scope encompasses specific chemical entities, their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, solvates, and their methods of synthesis and use in particular therapeutic indications. The broad language is common in pharmaceutical patents to secure coverage over various embodiments, including different formulations and delivery mechanisms.

2. Chemical Composition and Structure

The patent claims likely define a core heterocyclic or aromatic scaffold with substitution patterns conferring pharmacological activity aimed at a particular target, such as kinases, G-protein coupled receptors, or enzymes involved in disease pathways. The scope extends to derivatives, analogs, and derivatives with similar core structures that retain activity.

3. Therapeutic Use and Treatment Claims

The claims probably include method claims for treating specific diseases, possibly cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, or infectious conditions, based on the pharmacological profile disclosed. These claims shape the legal boundaries of the invention’s therapeutic applications.

4. Formulation and Delivery

Specific formulations — such as sustained-release, combination therapies, or targeted delivery systems — may also be encompassed within the patent's scope. Such claims broaden protection and are vital to prevent competitors from circumventing the patent via alternative formulations.


Claim Structure and Analysis

Patent claims usually fall into several categories:

1. Composition Claims

  • Cover the chemical compound(s), their salts, esters, or solvates.
  • Include derivatives, enantiomers, and stereoisomers with demonstrated activity.
  • Protect the compound irrespective of manufacturing process, provided the chemical entity remains within scope.

2. Method of Use Claims

  • Describe methods for treating specific diseases using the compound(s).
  • May specify dosages, treatment regimens, or combination therapies.
  • These are crucial for pharmaceutical companies to defend against generic manufacturers.

3. Process Claims

  • Cover synthesis methods, purification processes, or formulation procedures.
  • While narrower, they establish additional layers of intellectual property protection.

4. Device or Delivery System Claims

  • If applicable, claims may extend to delivery mechanisms such as implantable devices, nanoparticles, or targeted delivery systems.

Claim Interpretation

Given the typical formulation of WIPO patents, the claims tend to be broad initially, narrowing down through dependent claims. The broadest independent claims establish the core inventive concept, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments and variants, which are valuable during infringement and invalidity analyses.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

1. Patent Family and Territorial Coverage

WO2019178484 likely belongs to a broader patent family, with filings in major jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, China, and Japan. This global coverage indicates a strategic push to secure market exclusivity and prevent patent challenges within key territories.

2. Unique Innovation and Patent Strength

The patent's novelty hinges on:

  • A novel chemical scaffold with unexpectedly high efficacy or selectivity.
  • An innovative method of treatment offering clinical advantages over existing therapies.
  • A unique formulation or delivery modality that enhances bioavailability or patient compliance.

Strong patent claims supported by comprehensive data and robust inventive step assessments bolster the patent’s strength.

3. Overlap with Prior Art

The landscape is scrutinized for prior art references that disclose similar chemical structures or therapeutic methods. The application's claims should be non-obvious over the existing prior art, primarily assessed through inventive step and novelty criteria.

4. Follow-up Patents and Patent Coexistence

Potential follow-up patents may build on WO2019178484, covering derivatives or improved formulations, extending exclusivity and market growth. Coexistence with existing patents might influence licensing negotiations, generic entry timing, and competitive positioning.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Understanding the scope of WO2019178484 helps organizations assess FTO risks related to developing or marketing similar compounds. Broad claims could pose barriers, particularly if overlapping with third-party patents.

2. Patent Validity Risks

Claims must be sufficiently supported by data and inventive over the prior art to withstand validity challenges. Patent examiners scrutinize antiobviousness, novelty, and enablement, especially for pharmaceuticals with well-developed prior art.

3. Enforcement and Licensing Opportunities

Given the strategic claims and territorial filings, patent holders could engage in licensing or enforcement actions against infringing entities in targeted markets.


Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

  • For Innovators: Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses to identify potential infringement risks. Focus on invalidity grounds based on prior art to challenge broad claims.
  • For Patent Holders: Maintain robust patent prosecution strategies, including timely filings, extensive claim scopes, and international coverage.
  • For Investors: Evaluate the strength and breadth of patent claims as indicators of market exclusivity potential and competitive advantage.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: WO2019178484 likely covers specific chemical compounds, their methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications for particular diseases, with claim strategies designed to maximize broad protection.

  • Patent Landscape: The patent forms part of a strategic portfolio targeting global markets, with family members likely extending protection into critical jurisdictions, underpinning commercialization plans.

  • Legal Consideration: The breadth of claims necessitates continuous monitoring for prior art, potential invalidation challenges, and infringement risks to ensure market exclusivity.

  • Commercial Impact: Well-crafted claims, supported by strong clinical data, enable the patent holder to secure licensing deals, defend against generics, and establish market leadership.


FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative aspect of WO2019178484?
The patent likely claims a novel chemical scaffold or therapeutic method that offers advantages such as increased efficacy, selectivity, or reduced side effects over existing treatments.

2. How broad are the claims in WO2019178484?
The claims probably range from broad composition claims covering core chemical classes to narrower method-specific claims, providing layered protection.

3. How does WO2019178484 compare to other patents in the same therapeutic area?
It likely fills a gap by claiming unique chemical variants or methods not disclosed in prior art, thus potentially offering a competitive edge.

4. Can this patent be challenged for validity?
Yes. Its validity can be challenged via prior art searches, arguments of lack of novelty or inventive step, particularly if similar compounds or methods existed before the filing date.

5. What strategies should a competitor consider regarding this patent?
Competitors should audit their development pipelines for overlapping claims, consider designing around the patent, or challenge its validity through thorough prior art analysis.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent WO2019178484. Available from WIPO Publications.
  2. Patent landscape reports, industry analyses, and scientific publications related to the specific chemical class or therapeutic target.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.