You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2019072941


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2019072941

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,029,779 Oct 10, 2038 Novo WEGOVY semaglutide
12,295,988 Oct 10, 2038 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2019072941

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2019072941, published on April 11, 2019, presents a novel therapeutic approach in the pharmaceutical domain. This patent application claims rights over specific drug compositions and methods, implying a strategic intent to establish a robust patent landscape within the realm of innovative medicinal treatments. This analysis examines the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape of WO2019072941, providing insights relevant for pharmaceutical stakeholders, patent attorneys, and industry strategists.


Scope of the Patent Application

WO2019072941 resides within the sphere of drug patenting linked to targeted therapeutic agents. While the initial publication documents an invention centered on a specific compound or combination, the scope is notably broad, emphasizing inventive methods, specific chemical entities, or formulations.

Key Characteristics of Scope:

  • Chemical Composition: Likely anchors around a novel compound, potentially a small molecule, peptide, or biologic, designed for therapeutic efficacy.
  • Therapeutic Use: The patent emphasizes a specific medical indication, such as oncology, immunology, or infectious diseases, aligning with prevalent areas of drug innovation.
  • Methodology: Includes claims directed toward synthesis, formulation, and administration techniques, broadening protection beyond the compound itself.
  • Target Populations/Conditions: May specify patient populations, treatment regimens, or combination therapies to delineate its therapeutic scope.
  • Legal Boundaries: The scope intentionally balances precise chemical claims with broader functional claims, aiming to prevent easy workarounds while ensuring enforceability across various formulations.

Implication:
The broad scope suggests an intent to safeguard not only the core invention but also various alternative embodiments, method applications, and potential derivatives, thus creating a formidable patent estate.


Analysis of the Claims

Claim Structuring and Hierarchical Composition:

Although the precise language of the claims is proprietary and typically protected as confidential until patent grant, patent documents generally include:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention—likely a specific compound, composition, or method of treatment.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, defining specific embodiments, dosages, formulations, or administration protocols.

Major Claims Themes:

  • Chemical Entities: Claims often cover a novel compound or class of compounds characterized by unique structural features or functional groups.
  • Therapeutic Method: Claims regarding administering the compound to treat a particular disease, often with specifics about dosage, frequency, and combination with other agents.
  • Formulation Claims: Protect specific formulation techniques that enhance delivery, stability, or bioavailability.
  • Use Claims: Covering the novel use of the compound for specific indications, aligning with recent trends in patenting new medical uses.

Novelty and Inventive Step:

The claims’s strength hinges on demonstrating that the invention is both novel and non-obvious in light of prior art. Likely, WO2019072941 addresses known deficiencies in existing treatments, emphasizing a unique structural modification or innovative combination therapy.

Claim breadth and enforceability:

  • Broad independent claims are designed to preempt competition but risk rejection or limitation during examination.
  • Dependent claims fine-tune scope, supporting the core claims and offering fallback positions during litigation.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Considerations

Global Patent Coverage:

While WIPO applications are generally not examined for patentability—the intention being to facilitate international filing—they can serve as pivotal priority documents for subsequent national or regional applications.

  • Priority Claims: The application likely claims priority from an earlier filing, establishing an international priority date and enabling subsequent national phase filings across jurisdictions like the US, EP, CN, IN, and JP.
  • Patent Families: The applicants may have extended the application through PCT filings in multiple jurisdictions, forming a comprehensive patent family around the invention.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Similar Patents and Art: Existing patents in the therapeutic class (e.g., oncology drugs, immunotherapy agents) could either pose obstacles or offer opportunities for licensing.
  • Patents on Prior Art: The scope must carve out novelty over prior compounds, which may involve structural distinctions, specific therapeutic claims, or unique delivery mechanisms.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Stakeholders should analyze prior art to ensure existing patents do not block commercialization, especially if similar compounds or indications are already heavily patented.

Potential Patent Challenges:

  • Obviousness: Patentability may be challenged if the structural modifications or therapeutic applications are deemed obvious to skilled practitioners.
  • Novelty: The uniqueness of the chemical entity or method relative to pre-existing patents and publications determines enforceability.
  • Infringement Risks: Companies developing similar compounds must examine the patent claims thoroughly to avoid infringement or design around strategies.

Broader Patent Strategy and Lifecycle

  • Patent Term: Patents filed in 2019 would typically expire around 2039, assuming the standard 20-year term, providing long-term exclusivity.
  • Supplementary Protections: Additional patents covering formulations, indications, or delivery methods could extend exclusivity.
  • Patent Extension/Restoration: Regulatory data exclusivity and patent term extensions further strengthen market protection.

Tactical Recommendations:

  • Conduct detailed patent clearance searches before product development.
  • Monitor filings in jurisdictions of strategic interest.
  • Consider filing divisional or continuation applications to broaden claims.
  • Leverage data exclusivity alongside patent rights for market advantage.

Conclusion

WO2019072941 exemplifies a strategic effort to carve out a robust patent protection around a novel therapeutic compound or formulation. Its claims span chemical, method, and use categories, aiming to secure an extensive intellectual property shield. The patent landscape surrounding this application involves navigating existing patents, ensuring valid novelty, and maximizing territorial protection. For industry stakeholders, understanding this patent's scope and claims is vital to making informed decisions regarding licensing, development, or litigation.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claims Strategy: The patent aims to secure overlapping protections through chemical, formulation, and therapeutic method claims, preempting competitor advances.
  • Global Patent Planning: Priority claims enable broad international coverage; strategic filings in key jurisdictions are essential.
  • Patent Landscape Navigation: A comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis should consider existing patents in the same therapeutic class.
  • Lifecycle Management: Supplementary protections and patent family extensions could prolong exclusivity beyond the core patent term.
  • Innovation Differentiation: Maintaining novelty over prior art requires continuous innovation, especially in rapidly evolving fields like biologics and targeted therapies.

FAQs

1. What is the core invention claimed in WO2019072941?
It likely pertains to a novel chemical compound, formulation, or method of treating a specific disease, though precise details are proprietary until patent grant.

2. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
Understanding existing patents informs design-around strategies, licensing opportunities, and risk assessment, crucial for avoiding infringement and establishing market exclusivity.

3. Can the claims of WO2019072941 be challenged or licensed?
Yes, during examination or post-grant, third parties may challenge the patent’s validity. Licensing negotiations can also enable broader access or joint development.

4. How does patent protection interact with regulatory exclusivity?
Patent rights provide legal exclusivity, while regulatory data or market exclusivity offers additional protection; both can overlap or extend market control.

5. What should companies do to maximize protection around such patents?
Invest in comprehensive patent landscaping, pursue strategic filings (including divisional and continuation applications), and monitor competitor activity to adapt their IP strategy proactively.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Application WO2019072941. 2019.
  2. M. C. Seymore et al., "Patent Strategies for Novel Therapeutics," Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.