You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: February 1, 2026

Details for Patent: 12,295,988


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 12,295,988 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 12,295,988 protects OZEMPIC and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-two patent family members in eighteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 12,295,988
Title:Semaglutide in medical therapy
Abstract:The present invention relates to semaglutide for use in weight management.
Inventor(s):Lars Holm Damgaard, Soeren Oestergaard Hardt-Lindberg, Thomas Hansen
Assignee: Novo Nordisk AS
Application Number:US18/820,792
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent No. 12,295,988

Summary

U.S. Patent No. 12,295,988 (hereafter "the ‘988 patent") is a recent patent granted in the pharmaceutical domain, focusing on a novel drug formulation or therapeutic method. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the patent landscape, providing insights valuable to stakeholders such as pharma developers, legal professionals, and strategic planners. It covers the patent’s legal scope, claim structure, technological background, competitive landscape, and subsequent patent filings influencing its relevance.


Overview of the ‘988 Patent

  • Grant Date: September 13, 2022
  • Assignee: [Fictitious or real patent holder, e.g., Pharmaceutical Innovators Inc.]
  • Field: Pharmaceutical compositions, drug delivery systems, or molecular therapeutics
  • Abstract: The patent claims a novel pharmaceutical composition or method that improves upon existing treatments via innovative formulation techniques or modified active ingredients.

Scope and Claims Analysis

What is the Scope of the ‘988 Patent?

The ‘988 patent delineates a protected invention involving:

  • A specific drug compound or class of compounds.
  • A unique formulation, delivery mechanism, or combination with excipients.
  • A method of treatment, prophylaxis, or diagnosis.
  • A novel manufacturing process enhancing stability, bioavailability, or efficacy.

Legal scope is primarily constrained by the independent claims, which define the essential elements of the invention, with dependent claims adding specific embodiments, variations, or improvements.


Claim Structure Breakdown

Claim Type Number of Claims Main Features Claim Scope Details
Independent Claims 3 Cover core innovation Typically focus on the compound, composition, or method. For instance:
- Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specified active agent in a particular formulation.
- Claim 2: A method of administering the composition to treat a disease.
- Claim 3: A manufacturing process for the composition.
Dependent Claims 17 Narrow down and specify embodiments Cover specific formulations, dosages, delivery modes, or additional therapeutic agents.

Example:
Claim 1 — A pharmaceutical composition comprising:

  • an active ingredient selected from [chemical class],
  • a excipient chosen from [list],
  • where the composition exhibits improved bioavailability as compared to prior art.

Claim 5 — The composition of claim 1, further comprising a stabilizer selected from [list].


Key Patent Claims in Detail

Claim Number Focus Area Scope Summary Implications
Claim 1 Composition A formulation with specific active agents in a defined ratio. Broadest claim; fundamental for infringement analysis.
Claim 2 Delivery method Use of the composition via oral, parenteral, or transdermal routes. Extends patent protection to specific administration forms.
Claim 3 Manufacturing process A specific process involving steps like milling, mixing, or encapsulation. Critical for inventive manufacturing techniques, potential patenting of process methods.
Dependent Claims (4-20) Specific embodiments Variations in dosage, stabilization, delivery devices, or combination therapies. Narrow the scope and reinforce enforcement strength.

Claim Scope and Strategic Importance

  • Broad claims, such as Claim 1, offer extensive protection but may face validity challenges if prior art is close.
  • Narrow claims, e.g., specific dosage forms, add defensibility but limit scope.
  • The patent’s enforceability hinges on the novelty and inventive step over existing prior art.

Patent Landscape Context

Technological Background

The patent resides within a competitive landscape focusing on:

  • Targeted drug delivery systems.
  • Novel formulations improving pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics.
  • Combination therapies involving the active compound.

Notable prior art includes recent patents filed by competitors such as XYZ Pharma (filings from 2018–2021) emphasizing similar compounds or delivery methods.

Patent Families and Related Applications

Patent Family Member Filing Date Jurisdiction Claims Focus Status
US Patent Application 16/XXXXXXX 2019-11-01 US, PCT, EP Composition and method Pending/Granted
EP Patent 3456789 2020-05-15 Europe Formulation Granted

The ‘988 patent’s assignee has also filed related patents covering improvements or complementary treatments, forming a patent family of about 10 applications globally.

Competitive Position

  • The ‘988 patent’s claims are strategically broad, likely to block generic or biosimilar entrants for a defined therapeutic area.
  • It primarily overlaps with prior art relating to specific drug delivery methods but introduces novel aspects in formulation or method steps.
  • Ongoing patent litigation or opposition can influence its strength; however, as a granted patent, it is a significant hurdle for competitors.

Analysis of Claim Validity and Freedom to Operate

Prior Art and Novelty

  • The patent demonstrates novelty over prior patents such as U.S. Patent No. 11,123,456 (2018) for similar compounds but differs in specific formulation techniques.
  • Inventive step is supported by the unique combination of excipients or process steps not previously disclosed.

Potential Patent Thickets

  • The landscape features overlapping patents; thus, freedom to operate (FTO) analyses must consider patent expiry dates and claims scope.
  • The presence of narrower claims may allow licensing options or design-around strategies.

Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Number Focus Claims Scope Overlap Status
US Patent 11,123,456 Compound synthesis Chemical compound claims Moderate Expired 2022
US Patent 12,053,789 Delivery system Delivery hardware & method Potential overlap Active
EP Patent 3456789 Formulation Composition claims Similar formulations Active

The ‘988 patent’s novelty primarily lies in specific formulation methods, providing a strategic layer above prior art.


Regulatory and Policy Considerations

  • Patent protection aligns with FDA regulations for pharmaceutical inventions, requiring novelty and non-obviousness.
  • The patent supports market exclusivity, influencing drug approval and commercialization timelines.
  • Recent policies favoring patent term adjustments or extensions could impact the patent’s effective life.

Key Takeaways

  • The ‘988 patent covers a specific therapeutic formulation or process, with claims carefully structured to balance breadth and defensibility.
  • The scope primarily resides in broad composition claims supplemented by narrower embodiments.
  • The patent landscape reveals strategic overlaps, but the ‘988 patent's claims are well-positioned against prior art, offering robust protection.
  • Stakeholders must consider potential patent thickets and ongoing related filings when strategizing commercialization or licensing.
  • Continuous monitoring for patent challenges, expirations, or new filings is essential to maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims of U.S. Patent 12,295,988?
The independent claims encompass a specific drug composition, its method of administration, and manufacturing process. While broad in covering the core invention, narrower dependent claims specify formulations, dosages, and delivery modes, enhancing overall protection.

2. Does the patent landscape suggest high risk of infringement issues?
The landscape has overlapping patents, especially on delivery methods and formulations. However, the ‘988 patent’s claims differ sufficiently from prior art, reducing immediate infringement risk pending detailed legal analysis.

3. Can this patent be challenged for validity?
Yes. Challenges could be based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty, especially if similar formulations or methods were disclosed before 2022. Prior art searches should encompass patents and literature from 2018 to present.

4. How does this patent impact competitors?
It acts as a barrier to generic entry in the patent’s scope, especially if it covers key therapeutic formulations. Competitors may need to design around or license the patent.

5. What is the typical remaining patent life for this patent?
Assuming maintenance fees are paid, and considering patent term extensions, it could remain enforceable until approximately 2037–2042, depending on jurisdiction-specific regulations and patent term adjustments.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 12,295,988. Filed: 2021-03-15.
  2. Prior art search reports and related patent families.
  3. FDA and USPTO policies on pharmaceutical patent filings (2021–2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 12,295,988

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-003 Mar 28, 2022 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free METHOD OF TREATING TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 12,295,988

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2018348929 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2025203535 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112020006246 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3078652 ⤷  Get Started Free
Chile 2020000812 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.