Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2018212764


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2018212764

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial May 16, 2037 Bayer Hlthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
⤷  Start Trial May 16, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
⤷  Start Trial May 16, 2037 Bayer Hlthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
⤷  Start Trial May 16, 2037 Bayer Healthcare VITRAKVI larotrectinib sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2018212764

Last updated: September 9, 2025


Introduction

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent WO2018212764, lodged under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), pertains to novel innovations in the pharmaceutical domain. Generally, WIPO patents serve as international applications providing insight into emerging drug technologies and strategic patent positioning. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the scope, claims, and the patent landscape surrounding WO2018212764, facilitating informed decision-making for stakeholders in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and litigation.


Overview of Patent WO2018212764

Publication Details:

  • Publication Number: WO2018212764
  • Filing Date: (Assumed to be prior to publication in 2018; precise filing date not specified there)
  • Application Type: International Patent Application (PCT)
  • Applicant/Assignee: The applicant's identity is typically disclosed in the application, often associated with a pharmaceutical or biotech company.

Abstract Summary:
While the full text specifics are not accessible here, the abstract generally discloses a novel chemical entity or a combination thereof, designed for therapeutic use, potentially targeting a specific disease pathway, such as oncology, immunology, or infectious diseases.


Scope of the Patent

1. Technical Field & Purpose:
The patent’s scope primarily resides in the pharmaceutical compounds and their uses, with emphasis on therapeutic applications. It likely claims the chemical structures, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment utilizing the disclosed compounds.

2. Core Innovation:
The innovation could be structured around a novel class of molecules, such as a new kinase inhibitor, immune modulator, or antiviral agent, characterized by distinctive chemical modifications that confer improved efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetic profiles.

3. Geographical Coverage and Strategic Positioning:
As a WO publication, the patent application provides an international filing covering multiple jurisdictions. The applicant may pursue national phase entries in key markets such as the U.S., Europe, China, and emerging economies depending on strategic priorities.


Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims:

  • Compound claims: Usually claim specific chemical structures with defined substituents, stereochemistry, or core scaffolds. These claims establish the essence of the invention.
  • Use claims: Cover methods of using the compounds for the treatment of particular conditions, such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Composition claims: Protect pharmaceutical formulations comprising the novel compounds, including excipients and delivery methods.

2. Claim Dependence & Breadth:
The scope's breadth hinges on the nature of the claims. Broad structural claims aim to monopolize a large chemical space, while narrower claims focus on specific substitutions or compounds. The independence of fundamental claims determines enforceability and potential patent litigation hurdles.

3. Novelty & Inventive Step:
The claims are likely grounded in a novel structural motif not previously disclosed in prior art, such as patent databases or scientific literature. The inventive step may lie in altered chemical scaffolds yielding superior pharmacological profiles.

4. Potential Limitations & Vulnerabilities:
Patent claims may face challenges if prior art suggests similar compounds or uses, especially if structural similarities are identified. Strategic narrowing or interpretation of claims can mitigate such issues.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Context

1. Similar Patents & Artifacts:

  • Chemical Class Congeners: The patent landscape probably includes prior patents on related chemical classes, such as kinase inhibitors, protease blockers, or cytokine modulators.
  • Competitors & Collaborators: Major pharmaceutical companies continually file patents covering analogous compounds, creating a dense patent thicket. Notable players may include entities like Merck, Pfizer, or biotech startups.

2. Patent Family & Family Members:
WO2018212764 may be part of a broader patent family entailing filings in jurisdictions like the US (via US patent applications), Europe (EP filings), and China (CN applications). These counterparts bolster enforceability and market exclusivity.

3. Freedom-To-Operate (FTO) Considerations:
Given the extensive patenting in therapeutic areas like oncology, patent owners must assess potential infringement risks when developing or commercializing products based on these compounds.

4. Innovator Strategies:
Applicants might complement claims with method-of-use patents, delivery system patents, or biomarkers associated with the therapeutic efficacy of the compounds, broadening their IP position.


Implications for Patent Holders and Stakeholders

1. Industry Impact:
The patent signals ongoing innovation in the targeted therapeutic space, potentially indicating a novel mechanism of action or improved pharmacological profile. This could influence licensing negotiations, collaborations, or stock valuations.

2. Competitive Positioning:
If the patent’s claims are broad and enforceable, it may confer a near-monopoly or strategic advantage within the designated therapeutic class, dissuading competitors from entering the space without risk of infringement.

3. Patent Challenges & Litigation:
Existing art pathways are critical to assessing the robustness of the patent. Competitors may challenge the validity based on prior art disclosures, or the patent owner might seek to broaden or defend claims through legal proceedings.


Conclusion

WIPO patent WO2018212764 exemplifies strategic international patent protection for a novel pharmaceutical compound or use, with claims likely focused on specific chemical structures and their therapeutic applications. Its scope and robustness depend on claim breadth, prior art landscape, and jurisdictional enforceability. As the patent landscape continues to evolve, stakeholders must monitor closely for patent family developments, litigations, and freedom-to-operate risks to optimize R&D and commercialization strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of WO2018212764 revolves around innovative chemical entities or uses in a defined therapeutic area, with claims tailored to maximize protection while navigating competitive art.
  • The patent landscape is dense in pharmaceutical innovation, requiring detailed prior art searches and strategic claim drafting to secure enforceability.
  • International filings under WIPO facilitate broad geographic protection, but local patent office review determines patent validity.
  • Strategic patent claims can create barriers to entry and provide leverage in licensing or litigation scenarios.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent family extensions and competitor filings is essential for maintaining a competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What type of compounds does WO2018212764 likely cover?
It probably claims a novel chemical structure or class of molecules tailored for therapeutic use, possibly targeting specific diseases such as cancer or viral infections.

2. How broad are the claims typically in such WIPO patents?
Claims can range from narrow molecules with specific substituents to broad genus claims covering a large chemical class, depending on the applicant’s strategy.

3. What are the main challenges in prosecuting such pharmaceutical patents?
Prior art obstacles, patentability of the claimed invention, and ensuring enforceability across multiple jurisdictions can be challenging, especially with complex chemical patents.

4. How does this patent impact the drug development landscape?
It signals ongoing innovation, potentially leading to new therapies, and influences licensing, partnerships, and competitive positioning within the therapeutic area.

5. What should companies do to navigate the patent landscape around WO2018212764?
Conduct thorough patent landscape analyses, monitor family members, and assess freedom-to-operate before proceeding with R&D or commercialization plans.


References

  1. WIPO Patent WO2018212764. (Publication).
  2. Patent strategy literature and legal standards for pharmaceutical patents.
  3. Industry patent databases and prior art repositories.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.