You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2014204933


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2014204933

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 4, 2034 Supernus Pharms GOCOVRI amantadine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 17, 2034 Supernus Pharms GOCOVRI amantadine hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 17, 2034 Supernus Pharms GOCOVRI amantadine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2014204933 in the Context of Global Drug Patent Strategy

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Patent WO2014204933, published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), represents a significant element within the global pharmaceutical patent landscape. As an international patent application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), it aims to secure broad protection for innovative pharmaceutical compounds or methods, potentially influencing market exclusivity and competitive positioning. This analysis explores the scope and claims of WO2014204933, examines its strategic patent landscape implications, and offers insights into its role in the broader context of intellectual property rights (IPR) management within the pharmaceutical sector.


Scope of WO2014204933

International Patent Application Context
WO2014204933 was published on December 4, 2014, under the PCT system, which facilitates the filing of a single application to seek patent protection across multiple jurisdictions. The application’s scope serves as a foundation for national phase filings, contingent upon national patent offices’ examinations.

Scope Overview
The scope of WO2014204933 hinges on the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of its inventive subject matter—primarily specific pharmaceutical compounds, compositions, or methods of treatment. While the exact chemical structures or methods are not detailed here, typical WIPO applications in this domain encompass:

  • Novel chemical entities with therapeutic indications (e.g., kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies).
  • Novel methods of synthesis creating more efficient manufacturing processes.
  • New formulations enhancing drug stability or bioavailability.
  • Innovative treatment methods targeting unmet medical needs.

Claims Broadness and Strategic Positioning
WIPO applications often include broad claims designed to extend patent coverage into multiple jurisdictions, followed by narrower claims during national phase prosecution. Broad claims can cover:

  • Compound claims: Covering a family of chemical structures with potential variations.
  • Use claims: Asserting the compound's utility for a particular indication or disease.
  • Method claims: Outlining specific processes of synthesis or administration.

The scope aims to prevent competitors from producing similar analogs or alternative methods of use, thereby extending market exclusivity.


Analysis of Patent Claims

Claim Types
The claims within WO2014204933 likely mirror standard pharmaceutical patent strategies:

  • Composition claims: Covering the specific active ingredient(s) and their combinations within a formulation.
  • Use claims: Securing rights for specific therapeutic applications, often phrased as: “Use of compound X for treating disease Y.”
  • Process claims: Protecting unique manufacturing processes, which can be critical in establishing manufacturing monopolies.
  • Formulation claims: Detailing excipients, delivery systems, or delivery mechanisms that optimize therapeutic efficacy.

Claim Soundness and Patentability Considerations
Patent validity often depends on the claims’ clarity, robustness, and novelty:

  • Novelty: Claims must introduce a new chemical entity or method; any prior art references, such as earlier patents or publications, could challenge claim validity.
  • Inventive step: Claims should demonstrate an inventive advancement over existing solutions, e.g., improved efficacy or safety.
  • Industrial applicability: Claims must be applicable in a manufacturing or therapeutic context.

Potential for Patent Thickets
The strategic inclusion of multiple dependent claims, covering various chemical analogs, dosage forms, and therapeutic uses, can lead to “patent thickets”—a dense web of patents that complicate competitors’ freedom to operate.


Patent Landscape for the WO2014204933 Family

Global Patent Filing Strategy
Applicants typically pursue a multi-layered patent landscape comprising:

  • International Phase: Filing through WIPO’s PCT system to secure an initial, broad international filing.
  • National Phase Entries: Proceeding with national filings in key markets such as the US, EU, China, Japan, India, and emerging markets.
  • Follow-up Filings: Filing divisional and continuation applications to extend protection and cover new uses or modifications.

Jurisdictional Variations
Patent laws differ across jurisdictions, affecting scope:

  • In the US, claims are examined for obviousness per the KSR standard; broad claims may face ease of examination.
  • In Europe, the European Patent Convention emphasizes inventive step and sufficient disclosure, potentially impacting claim scope.
  • Emerging markets like China and India may have stricter examinations on inventive step but offer strategic access points for market entry.

Patent Extensions and Conditional Protections
In some jurisdictions, patent protections can be extended via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), prolonging exclusivity beyond the initial patent term, especially critical for high-cost pharmaceuticals.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) and Patent Litigation Landscape
Parties should analyze existing patents within the same therapeutic area to avoid infringement risks, considering potential patent expiration, licensing opportunities, or patent opposition strategies.


Implications for Stakeholders

Innovator Strategy
Patent WO2014204933 exemplifies a proactive approach to securing broad protection early in the product development lifecycle. The scope likely encompasses fundamental chemical structures, methods of use, and manufacturing processes—laying a foundation for downstream patent applications and licensing.

Generic and Biosimilar Competition
The broad claims, particularly if they cover core compounds and methods, can pose significant barriers to generic manufacturers, delaying market entry and generic competition. Patent challenges or invalidity trials could ensue if claims are overly broad or lack inventive step.

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations
Patent protection facilitates exclusivity that supports high R&D investments. When aligned with regulatory data exclusivity periods, patents like WO2014204933 become cornerstones of commercial strategy, influencing pricing, marketing, and partnership opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: WO2014204933’s scope likely encompasses chemical compounds, therapeutic uses, and manufacturing processes, designed to establish a comprehensive patent estate.
  • Global Patent Landscape: Successful prosecution in key jurisdictions depends on tailoring claims to local patent laws, with a strategic focus on extending protection via national phase applications.
  • Patent Validity and Challenges: Ensuring claims are novel, inventive, and non-obvious is crucial; competitors may challenge broad claims or pursue invalidation proceedings.
  • Market Exclusivity: The patent landscape influences market dynamics by delaying generic entry, particularly if the patent claims cover core active ingredients.
  • Strategic IP Management: Effective patenting, combined with vigilant landscape and infringement analysis, provides a competitive edge for innovators.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of WIPO patent applications like WO2014204933 for pharmaceutical innovation?
They serve as a foundational step in protecting novel compounds, formulations, and methods internationally, enabling applicants to secure rights across multiple jurisdictions and establish a competitive market position.

2. How do broad patent claims impact generic drug market entry?
Broad claims can extend patent life-span and scope, creating barriers for generic competitors. Competitors may challenge such claims through legal proceedings or work around them via alternative compounds or formulations.

3. What are common challenges faced during prosecution of WIPO applications?
Applicants must align claims with local patent laws, particularly regarding novelty and inventive step. Overly broad claims may face rejection or require narrowing during national phase filings.

4. How does the patent landscape influence global drug commercialization?
It determines the timing of market entry, potential licensing opportunities, and litigation risks, influencing strategic decisions on investment, R&D, and partnerships.

5. What role do patent extensions play after the initial patent grant?
Extensions like SPCs can prolong exclusivity for pharmaceuticals, ensuring market protection beyond the standard patent term, especially vital for high-cost, high-investment drugs.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent WO2014204933. Published December 4, 2014.
  2. EPO Guidelines for Examination, 2023.
  3. USPTO Manual of Patent Examining Procedure.
  4. European Patent Convention (EPC) Regulations.
  5. KSR v. Teleflex, 550 U.S. 398 (2007).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.