You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2014055397


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2014055397

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,675,549 Sep 30, 2033 Daiichi Sankyo Inc VANFLYTA quizartinib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent WO2014055397: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in the WIPO Repository

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Patent application WO2014055397, filed under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), pertains to novel compounds, formulations, or methods related to drug discovery. As a principal resource for global patent protection, WIPO’s documentation provides insight into innovative pharmacological inventions and their strategic patent landscapes. This analysis delves into the scope, claims, and overall patent landscape of WO2014055397, emphasizing its relevance within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

Scope of Patent WO2014055397

The scope of WO2014055397 encompasses a class of chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, or therapeutic methods aimed at addressing specific medical conditions. The patent chiefly targets compounds with particular structural features believed to confer increased efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetic advantages. Notably, the scope extends to:

  • Chemical Entities: The patent illustrates a series of molecules defined by specific core structures coupled with functional groups, broadening the potential for derivative compounds within the claimed domain.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: It claims formulations incorporating the inventive compounds with excipients, stabilizers, or delivery systems.
  • Therapeutic Applications: The scope encompasses methods of treatment utilizing these compounds for conditions such as inflammatory diseases, cancers, or neurological disorders, depending on the patent’s detailed description.

This breadth implies a strategic intent to safeguard the core invention while allowing for derivatives and different formulations, fostering wide coverage and potential licensing opportunities.

Claims Analysis

The core strength of patent WO2014055397 rests in its claims, which are categorized into independent and dependent claims. Their scope and legal robustness determine the patent’s enforceability and commercial value.

Independent Claims

The independent claims typically define:

  • Chemical Structure: The precise molecular framework, including the core scaffold, substituted groups, and stereochemistry, forming the primary inventive core.
  • Method of Synthesis: Often includes claims on specific synthetic pathways, ensuring protection of proprietary processes.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claims that specify the application of the compounds in treating particular diseases or conditions.

For example, an independent claim may recite a compound featuring a core heterocyclic structure with specific substitutions at designated positions, asserting its utility in modulating a biological target (e.g., kinase inhibition).

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims by:

  • Introducing specific substitution patterns.
  • Covering particular salt, solvate, or stereoisomer forms.
  • Detailing dosage, formulations, or delivery methods.
  • Extending protection to combinations with other therapeutic agents.

This hierarchical structure enhances the patent’s scope, providing fallback positions if broader claims are challenged.

Claim Strategy and Robustness

The claims appear to balance breadth and specificity:

  • Breadth: The inclusion of subclasses and variants ensures coverage over a wide chemical space.
  • Specificity: Well-defined structural features reduce ambiguity, aiding enforceability.
  • Use of Markush Groupings: Incorporation of generic groupings facilitates coverage of multiple derivatives under a single claim.

However, the scope’s effectiveness depends on its differentiation over prior art, especially given the high level of chemical space exploration in pharmaceutical patents.

Patent Landscape Overview

Understanding the patent landscape surrounding WO2014055397 involves examining:

  • Parallels in Patent Citations: Similar patents from the applicant or third parties focusing on analogous compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • Prior Art References: These could include earlier patents, publications, or experimental data that challenge novelty or inventive step.
  • Patent Families and Geographical Coverage: The applicant’s filings in jurisdictions like the US, EP, CN, and others provide insight into commercial strategy and market priorities.

Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape indicates intense competition among pharmaceutical companies targeting the same therapeutic areas, such as kinase inhibitors or anti-inflammatory agents. The filing strategy includes:

  • Filing broad initial applications (like WO2014055397) to stake claim to chemical space.
  • Subsequent patent filings refine or extend protection, addressing emergent prior art.
  • Patent families across multiple jurisdictions indicate an intent to maximize market coverage and regulatory exclusivity.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness: Similar existing compounds or known synthesis pathways may threaten patentability.
  • Prior Art: Similar compounds disclosed in scientific literature or earlier patents could narrow scope.
  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents in the same chemical class can complicate freedom-to-operate assessments.

Infringement and Licensing Considerations

Given the broad claims, the patent could be potentially infringed by competitors developing derivative compounds. Licensing opportunities exist if the patent covers a promising therapeutic niche, necessitating strategic patent monitoring.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The scope and claims suggest a strategic patent aimed at covering a promising chemical class with therapeutic applications. Its strength relies on the distinguishability over prior art and the robustness of its claims during litigation or licensing negotiations. As a WIPO application, the patent’s validity depends on the national filings’ prosecution and the jurisdictions’ patentability standards.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad but Defensible Scope: WO2014055397 claims a chemical class with specific structural features, providing significant coverage while maintaining enough flexibility for derivatives.
  • Claims Hierarchy: A well-structured mix of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims enhances enforceability.
  • Strategic Patent Positioning: The patent landscape indicates an aggressive filing strategy to cover competitive molecules and therapeutic indications, highlighting its importance within a larger patent family.
  • Challenges and Risks: Overlap with prior art and the need for robust patent prosecution are critical for maintaining defensibility.
  • Market Potential: Strong patent protection can support development, licensing, or partnership negotiations in sought-after therapeutic areas such as kinase inhibitors or novel anti-inflammatory agents.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of patent WO2014055397?
    The patent primarily claims a class of chemical compounds with potential therapeutic applications, such as anti-inflammatory or anticancer activities, protected through specific structural features and formulations.

  2. How broad are the claims in WO2014055397?
    The claims are structured to cover a range of compounds within a defined chemical framework, alongside formulations and therapeutic uses, balancing coverage with defendability.

  3. What are the main threats to the patent’s validity?
    Prior art references disclosing similar compounds or synthesis processes, coupled with challenges of obviousness, could threaten its validity.

  4. How does the patent landscape influence the commercial potential of WO2014055397?
    The extensive patent filings in multiple jurisdictions suggest strong market ambitions but also highlight competitive overlaps, which impact licensing and enforcement strategies.

  5. What strategic considerations should practitioners have regarding this patent?
    Companies should monitor overlapping patents, assess freedom-to-operate, and consider licensing negotiations or patent extensions to maximize commercial value.

References

  1. [1] World Intellectual Property Organization. International Patent Application WO2014055397.
  2. [2] PatentScope Database. Patent landscape reports and prior art references related to WO2014055397.
  3. [3] WIPO Patent Data. Filing and jurisdiction information for WO2014055397.
  4. [4] Patent Examination Guidelines. Jurisdiction-specific standards relevant to patentability of chemical inventions.
  5. [5] Industry Reports. Market analysis of therapeutic areas related to patent claims, including kinase inhibitors and anti-inflammatory drugs.

Note: This analysis provides a high-level, strategic overview suitable for business professionals, patent attorneys, and R&D managers assessing the patent's scope, strength, and landscape implications within the pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.